Will I get my ban badge?

~enigma~ said:
Can you answer a simple question or are you going to refuse answering so you can look like a defender of the stupidity that you defend? What does WW@ have to do with a thread on LCF about Jones and Screw Loose Change? Answer that...otherwise I really don't want to listen to your stupidity.
Click to expand...

:)
So you accept that Germany invaded France in May 1940?
Then I wont inflict any more of my "stupidity" on you.
 
tacodaemon said:
Truthers sure have an eagerness to believe they have totally "owned" the people they disagree with. For example, remember that ridiculous thread about a month ago in which TonicBlue tried to convince us that there were terrorists driving around on 9/11 in a truck with a picture of the 9/11 attacks painted on the side? Well, one of the LCFers thinks that Gravy was utterly "owned" in that thread.
Click to expand...


Were I (God forbid) a twoofer, just about the last thread I'd ever mention is that one about the terrorists driving around in a van sporting a painting of the twin towers being attacked. Of all the coma-inducing stupidity ever uttered in the name of 9/11 twoofiness, that claim has to rank as the most insane -- and considering the competition, that's really, really saying something.
 
Wow that guy also claims it was Italy that invaded Greece... someone tell the ANZACs! They seem to remember fighting German Panzers. I'm sure they'll be relieved to discover they were mistaken all these years.

(Actually, someone tell the Greeks too, because they friggen hate Germans...)

-Gumboot
 
Those were holographic Panzers, Gumboot. Everyone knows this.
 
gumboot said:
Wow that guy also claims it was Italy that invaded Greece... someone tell the ANZACs! They seem to remember fighting German Panzers. I'm sure they'll be relieved to discover they were mistaken all these years.

(Actually, someone tell the Greeks too, because they friggen hate Germans...)

-Gumboot
Click to expand...
Andrew could you do a cut and paste where TxGuy said Italy and soley Italy attacked Greece. Be careful where you tread because I am TxGuy not an idiot like uncle Fester.
 
Just for the record... JamesB doesn't appear to have misquoted Jason Bermas. In his first comment, where he uses the word "invaded" he is not directly quoting...

Addressing the change from "invade" to "take over". Invasion essentially means to "take over by force". Therefore any country that was "invaded" was also taken over. Thus by interpreting Bermas' quote as meaning "invading" JamesB is actually doing him a favour - because Germany "took over" even more countries than they invaded.

I have to agree that WW2 is off topic for that thread, but I don't see how that's relevant. Since when was being off topic an appropriate banning offense? Yet it's okay for Dylan to tell JamesB he "has a stick up his [rule8]"?

-Gumboot
 
So stop me and correct me where I'm wrong but I see this thread as positive proof that some people here have nothing better to do with their life than attack someone who defended Jason Bermas for being misquoted over a topic as mundane as WW2 trivia when your problem with him is 9/11 research? IOW you are not attacking any of his or their arguments but instead you choose to attack a totally irrelevant point? That is just sad. I think now would be a good time for alot of people here to step back and ask themselves why bother if they can only argue about trivialities. WW2 has nothing to do with 9/11 and I have been asking you guys to explain why you attack it. Funny, no answer but continuing stupidity...that speaks volumes...
 
gumboot said:
Just for the record... JamesB doesn't appear to have misquoted Jason Bermas. In his first comment, where he uses the word "invaded" he is not directly quoting...

Addressing the change from "invade" to "take over". Invasion essentially means to "take over by force". Therefore any country that was "invaded" was also taken over. Thus by interpreting Bermas' quote as meaning "invading" JamesB is actually doing him a favour - because Germany "took over" even more countries than they invaded.

I have to agree that WW2 is off topic for that thread, but I don't see how that's relevant. Since when was being off topic an appropriate banning offense? Yet it's okay for Dylan to tell JamesB he "has a stick up his [rule8]"?

-Gumboot
Click to expand...
Did I defend what Dylan said? I just said that running here starting a thread after JamesB asked to be banned was a really immature and flighty thing. Now are you going to show where I said Italy attacked Greece alone or are we all to assume you realize your error?
 
~enigma~ said:
Andrew could you do a cut and paste where TxGuy said Italy and soley Italy attacked Greece. Be careful where you tread because I am TxGuy not an idiot like uncle Fester.
Click to expand...

Sure...

You at LCF said:
You are also padding your list with countries such as Greece that Hitler attacked with Italy.
Click to expand...

Bearing in mind, the only country Bermas could originally name was Poland, which was jointly invaded by Germany and Russia.

Given that, the context of your above statement is where you are trying to demonstrate nations that Germany did not invade. Thus your statement above reads to me as Hitler got Italy to invade Greece for him.

This is, of course, false. Italy invaded Greece on its own initiative, was beaten, and lost much of southern Albania in the process. Germany then came down and carried out their own successful invasion of Greece.

I have to say I'm a little disappointed if you are TxGuy. Your statements regarding WW2 are full of factual errors.

As far as the problem of Bermas not knowing all of this... Bermas claims to be the researcher for the Loose Change team. Not knowing the precise details of WW2 is not a serious problem. Not knowing the name of every country Germany invaded is not a serious problem. Thinking Germany only invaded TWO countries IS a problem.

Researchers should have well above average knowledge of history. By this admission, Bermas reveals that his historical knowledge is well below average (I honestly do not know a single person who doesn't know Germany invaded most of Europe).

-Gumboot
 
gumboot said:
Sure...



Bearing in mind, the only country Bermas could originally name was Poland, which was jointly invaded by Germany and Russia.

Given that, the context of your above statement is where you are trying to demonstrate nations that Germany did not invade. Thus your statement above reads to me as Hitler got Italy to invade Greece for him.

This is, of course, false. Italy invaded Greece on its own initiative, was beaten, and lost much of southern Albania in the process. Germany then came down and carried out their own successful invasion of Greece.

I have to say I'm a little disappointed if you are TxGuy. Your statements regarding WW2 are full of factual errors.

As far as the problem of Bermas not knowing all of this... Bermas claims to be the researcher for the Loose Change team. Not knowing the precise details of WW2 is not a serious problem. Not knowing the name of every country Germany invaded is not a serious problem. Thinking Germany only invaded TWO countries IS a problem.

Researchers should have well above average knowledge of history. By this admission, Bermas reveals that his historical knowledge is well below average (I honestly do not know a single person who doesn't know Germany invaded most of Europe).

-Gumboot
Click to expand...
So I said he attacked with Italy and your being idiotic enough to claim I said Italy attacked Greece without Germany? Do you know how to read? It is apparent you know how to write cause i read your NORAD report but it seems you are unable to read. Apologize for your lies about what I said...can you understand what I asked?
 
HyJinX said:
Those were holographic Panzers, Gumboot. Everyone knows this.
Click to expand...

Both my great uncles fought in NZ 2nd Division in Greece. Those holographic bullets fired by the holographic Germans seemed to inflict surprisingly real fatal wounds on a lot of their mates.

My Dad's father was in the British army in Northern France in 1940. He seemed sure that the desperate fighting and retreat to the coast, culminating in the epic defence and evacuation from Dunkirk was against invading Germans. Perhaps he got it wrong and it was a bunch of Parisian traffic wardens trying to issue parking tickets for the tanks.
 
Cmon Andrew...I'm waiting for your apology for twisting my words...is it coming or do you only expect woos to apologize for lying?
 
Carnivore said:
Both my great uncles fought in NZ 2nd Division in Greece. Those holographic bullets fired by the holographic Germans seemed to inflict surprisingly real fatal wounds on a lot of their mates.

My Dad's father was in the British army in Northern France in 1940. He seemed sure that the desperate fighting and retreat to the coast, culminating in the epic defence and evacuation from Dunkirk was against invading Germans. Perhaps he got it wrong and it was a bunch of Parisian traffic wardens trying to issue parking tickets for the tanks.
Click to expand...

I certainly meant no disrespect to your great uncles. I was merely trying to make light of a heated debate. I interject inappropriately at times. I meant to offend nobody...especially those that suffered greatly and gave the ultimate sacrifice to destroy tyranny. My humor was miscalculated. My apologies.
 
Geez, I just thought it was funny that Dylan threatened to ban me for quoting Jason. I wasn't intending to start a civil war. :boxedin:
 
JamesB said:
Geez, I just thought it was funny that Dylan threatened to ban me for quoting Jason. I wasn't intending to start a civil war. :boxedin:
Click to expand...
You didn't. The guys here that continued to harp on WW2 being relevant to 9/11 did and now Andrew and his apparent refusal to apologize for twisting my words is. you are not responsible for his actions....
 
tacodaemon said:
Truthers sure have an eagerness to believe they have totally "owned" the people they disagree with. For example, remember that ridiculous thread about a month ago in which TonicBlue tried to convince us that there were terrorists driving around on 9/11 in a truck with a picture of the 9/11 attacks painted on the side? Well, one of the LCFers thinks that Gravy was utterly "owned" in that thread.
Click to expand...


8bitagent said:
I admit, this is a huge story, probably the biggest 9/11 breakthrough since the BBC WTC7 thing.
Click to expand...

:dl:
 
HyJinX said:
I certainly meant no disrespect to your great uncles. I was merely trying to make light of a heated debate. I interject inappropriately at times. I meant to offend nobody...especially those that suffered greatly and gave the ultimate sacrifice to destroy tyranny. My humor was miscalculated. My apologies.
Click to expand...


My humour is often misinterpreted also. Absolutely no offence taken, I know you were mocking a hypothetical " No Panzer" CT and it tickled me.:) My comments werent directed at you, I was merely expressing disbelief that anyone could feel able to rewrite history that was observed and recorded by untold millions within living memory. Sorry if I made you uncomfortable - you go right on interjecting!:D
 
Par for the course on a forum where intended meaning can be truly misunderstood. But my apology still stands because, regardless of the nature of my intended humor, I still made light of a very real tragedy. You have a personal connection to that tragedy...and humor has no place within that truism. Thank you for clarifying...but I do feel bad about making light of something that was very real...too real...for many families.

I too feel contempt for those who try to rewrite history...I also feel a little contempt for myself for making mockery of it.

A good lesson all around. Thanks for understanding and expressing your side.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom