432 shows harmony of Sun, Moon, Earth Design

Paul said:
How about the truth, you said "the pyramid still looks brand new". Tell us, what did the pyramids look like when they were new?
Click to expand...

You are referring to a hypothetical pyramid standing next to a modern office building, both brand-new. Perhaps, you missed the fact it wasn't even created by me but by someone, who wished to compare great pyramids to great office-buildings. Just to fill you in on what was said.

Tell us, what did the pyramids look like when they were new?
Click to expand...

New? That's what I'd say, but you would want to argue about that, too.
 
Last edited:
Paul said:
Ooh, pick me, pick me, I know: Are they a figment of your overactive imagination?
Click to expand...

One thing is clear - you consider these line-holders to be a figment of imagination, no matter whose. Add to this the fact that line-holders are in principle everywhere, and we are left facing the truth that the said figment is in your imagination only.
I was not kidding, when I replied to Belz that he himself gave a good example of 'line-holders'. It may not have been what he wanted, as he probably published the picture of his example of a line-holder, thinking it was funny and perfectly ridiculous.
Well, it wasn't. If you go by the rules, it will force some lines. That's the gist of it.
*********************************
Ergo-cargo-escargot:jaw-dropp
 
Jiri said:
One thing is clear - you consider these line-holders to be a figment of imagination, no matter whose. Add to this the fact that line-holders are in principle everywhere, and we are left facing the truth that the said figment is in your imagination only.
I was not kidding, when I replied to Belz that he himself gave a good example of 'line-holders'. It may not have been what he wanted, as he probably published the picture of his example of a line-holder, thinking it was funny and perfectly ridiculous.
Well, it wasn't. If you go by the rules, it will force some lines. That's the gist of it.
*********************************
Ergo-cargo-escargot:jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

are you angry?
 
Jiri said:
One thing is clear - you consider these line-holders to be a figment of imagination, no matter whose. Add to this the fact that line-holders are in principle everywhere, and we are left facing the truth that the said figment is in your imagination only.
I was not kidding, when I replied to Belz that he himself gave a good example of 'line-holders'. It may not have been what he wanted, as he probably published the picture of his example of a line-holder, thinking it was funny and perfectly ridiculous.
Well, it wasn't. If you go by the rules, it will force some lines. That's the gist of it.
*********************************
Ergo-cargo-escargot
Click to expand...


Macoy said:
are you angry?
Click to expand...

Do I sound angry? Should I be angry? Would you be angry if you were me? Are they angry? Am I extra-pleasant, when angry? Do you love it when I am angry? Have you ever seen anyone as angry as me?
 
Jiri said:
Do I sound angry? Should I be angry? Would you be angry if you were me? Are they angry? Am I extra-pleasant, when angry? Do you love it when I am angry? Have you ever seen anyone as angry as me?
Click to expand...

why are you angry, tell me that.
 
Jiri said:
You are referring to a hypothetical pyramid standing next to a modern office building, both brand-new.
Click to expand...
No I'm not, I'm referring to you saying the pyramids look new:
Jiri said:
with just a millenium gone what would scrape skies is looking up at daisies, but the pyramid still looks brand new.
Click to expand...



Perhaps, you missed the fact it wasn't even created by me but by someone, who wished to compare great pyramids to great office-buildings.
Click to expand...
And what they said is correct, "put a skyscraper along side a pyramid and tell me which one is more functional, a pyramid is a great waste of material."


New? That's what I'd say, but you would want to argue about that, too.
Click to expand...
That depends, are you going to make some silly claims about what new pyramids looked like?
 
Jiri said:
One thing is clear - you consider these line-holders to be a figment of imagination, no matter whose.
Click to expand...
Oh no, I definitely consider them to be a figment of your imagination.


Add to this the fact that line-holders are in principle everywhere,
Click to expand...
Only if I accept your ideas.


and we are left facing the truth that the said figment is in your imagination only
Click to expand...
Who's this we, are you talking about the little voices in your head again?


If you go by the rules, it will force some lines. That's the gist of it.
Click to expand...
So the gist is, if you force lines onto an image, that image will have lines on it.
 
Paul said:
No I'm not, I'm referring to you saying the pyramids look new:

And what they said is correct, "put a skyscraper along side a pyramid and tell me which one is more functional, a pyramid is a great waste of material."

That depends, are you going to make some silly claims about what new pyramids looked like?
Click to expand...

Here is what I am going to do, Paul - put you on my Ignore list, which means that you should not expect replies from me to your whatever it is you are practising here.
 
Paulhoff said:
The pyramid failed to do it job anyway, the pharaoh and his gold where still stolen. Even if it is impressive in size, put a skyscraper along side a pyramid and tell me which one is more functional, a pyramid is a great waste of material.

Paul

:) :) :)
Click to expand...
Now that I quoted myself, I am the one who posted about the pyramids and skyscrapers and functional.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Jiri said:
Sorry, but should you not capitalize the word?
As to the instructions, they are there on the first page. However the O.T. is OT to this thread.
Soon, you will claim that I showed you no line-holders, too. So, tell me, do you know what these darned 'line-holders' might be?
Click to expand...
sorry, what word? god? I am not using it as a definate noun. I am using it to say god. That's a singular indefinate noun. Why would I capitalize that. I am not using it in place of YHWH.
You do not actually address my issue of the OT at all or the fact that humans and their ancestors were eating meat long before the OT.


Sure, there are six billion would-be carnivores out there, and I am not going to argue the nature of the human digestive system with them all. The info is in books, etc., whoever wants it can go and get it.
Click to expand...

So, since you refuse to posit any proof at all for your theory, you are telling us you have no proof and made it all up? (it is not on us to prove your unsuported theory, but on you).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom