Mike Walter (USA Today) Responds to Conspiracists Misquoting Him

You say I am wrong I say you are wrong.

Goodnight.

Why are you being stubborn? I would very much like to see your response to this:

Funny math of the day!, for flight 77 to make the turns at a gentle bank and the turn Lyte says 77 did. The speed has to be 87 KIAS! Flight 77 can not fly at 87 KIAS, that is below stall speed and everyone said it was going FAST! LYTE, hello?

As Beachnut stated, 87 KIAS is a little less than 100 mph
 
Mike Walter saw an American Airlines Jet HIT THE PENTAGON. He just said it, on that video...so the simple question, and it is a SIMPLE QUESTION, Lyte, is...

Do you think he is lying? I dont want explanations, or conditions, or "buts" simply answer...do you think he is lying about what he saw that day, as described in the video for this threads OP.

TAM:)
 
Lyte:

He says...

"What I saw was the JET GOING IN, and The WINGS GOING LIKE THIS.." I don't see him stating that he only saw the fireball...he says he saw the JET GOING IN....

TAM:)
 
I can't see how any rational person would believe in such a ludicrously complex flyover theory, considering that a single tourist with a video camera would have the ability to expose the entire operation.

If 'they' wanted to make it look a plane had flown into the building, why not just...say...fly a plane into the building?
 
If 'they' wanted to make it look a plane had flown into the building, why not just...say...fly a plane into the building?

Maybe they weren't sure how much damage it would cause, so they wanted a more controllable version.

Only 'truthers' are able to guess exactly how much damage a plane would, or wouldn't, cause to a structure. Aint that right, lyte?
 
Notice there are two do not enter signs. I have a hunch that Lyte is deceitful and zooms into the the one on the left, which support his pet theory. In reality, it's likely that the witness was referring to the one on the right which is 100% consistent with the "official" flight path, with the downed lightpoles, with what Lloyd England and other witnesses saw.

Kudos.

:dollarsig
 
Originally Posted by Debunk911Myths
Notice there are two do not enter signs. I have a hunch that Lyte is deceitful and zooms into the the one on the left, which support his pet theory. In reality, it's likely that the witness was referring to the one on the right which is 100% consistent with the "official" flight path, with the downed lightpoles, with what Lloyd England and other witnesses saw.

Guaranteed! Look at the trussing around Lytetrip's, no othersign to the right!
The real one, has signs to the right! Another catch, nice one!
 
He saw a "bank" and the plane pick up speed.

He would not have seen a bank at all, graceful or not, if the official story were true.

False. Many people described the plane banking as it neared the Pentagon.

Gary Bauer "I turned and looked and the plane came from behind us and banked to the right and went into the Pentagon."

Penny Elgas: "I saw the plane coming in slow motion toward my car and then it banked in the slightest turn in front of me, toward the heliport."

Bruce Elliott: "It was banking and garnering speed. I felt it was headed for the Pentagon."

Aydan Kizildrgli, while driving by the Pentagon,"saw the jetliner bank slightly"

Steve Anderson: "I watched in horror as the plane flew at treetop level, banked slightly to the left, drug it's wing along the ground and slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon exploding into a giant orange fireball."

Robert Leonard: "The aircraft, so close to the ground, was banked skillfully to the right, leveled off perpendicular to the Pentagon's southwest side, then went full throttle directly toward the building.

Steve Snaman (paraphrased by news article): the jetliner came in low at full throttle, banked left and smashed into the wall of the Pentagon.

Steve McCoy: Their conversation about the World Trade Center attack earlier that morning was interrupted by the sight and sound of a commercial airliner in steep descent, banking sharply to its right before disappearing beyond the horizon.
 
At 23 minutes into pentacon (which i started watching), the witness mentions a "do not enter" sign and the camera zooms into it.

[qimg]http://www.debunk911myths.org/topics/images/4/4a/Pentacon-donotenter.jpg[/qimg]

Here's a view of the Pentagon from the Air Force Memorial:

[qimg]http://www.debunk911myths.org/topics/images/thumb/9/97/Pentagon_from_airforcememorial2.jpg/800px-Pentagon_from_airforcememorial2.jpg[/qimg]

Same image, zoomed in with the "do not exit" signs highlighted:

[qimg]http://www.debunk911myths.org/topics/images/thumb/a/a2/Pentagon_from_airforcememorial2-zoomhighlight.jpg/800px-Pentagon_from_airforcememorial2-zoomhighlight.jpg[/qimg]

High resolution images can be seen here:
http://www.debunk911myths.org/topics/index.php?title=Gallery4

Notice there are two do not enter signs. I have a hunch that Lyte is deceitful and zooms into the the one on the left, which support his pet theory. In reality, it's likely that the witness was referring to the one on the right which is 100% consistent with the "official" flight path, with the downed lightpoles, with what Lloyd England and other witnesses saw.


Lyte I am highly interested in your response to this.
 
At 23 minutes into pentacon (which i started watching), the witness mentions a "do not enter" sign and the camera zooms into it.

http://www.debunk911myths.org/topics/images/4/4a/Pentacon-donotenter.jpg

Here's a view of the Pentagon from the Air Force Memorial:

http://www.debunk911myths.org/topic...jpg/800px-Pentagon_from_airforcememorial2.jpg

Same image, zoomed in with the "do not exit" signs highlighted:

http://www.debunk911myths.org/topic...agon_from_airforcememorial2-zoomhighlight.jpg

High resolution images can be seen here:
http://www.debunk911myths.org/topics/index.php?title=Gallery4

Notice there are two do not enter signs. I have a hunch that Lyte is deceitful and zooms into the the one on the left, which support his pet theory. In reality, it's likely that the witness was referring to the one on the right which is 100% consistent with the "official" flight path, with the downed lightpoles, with what Lloyd England and other witnesses saw.

Lyte,
Will you re-interview your witnesses now that it appears there are 2 signs and they could have been confused?
 
Strangely, Lyte has been absent this thread for about fifteen hours. Couldn't be anything to do with being caught out about his video'ed signs, could it? Hmmmmm?
 
Has anyone ever met a CT who could answer that?

Have anyone ever even seen one try?


I have never seen one try and would love to hear why a secret cabal would spend trillions to fake it all for some other vague outcome.

but also *bump* for Lyte, I want to know if your prepared to concede your theory could be wrong based on the stop signs position?

Cheers
 
Strangely, Lyte has been absent this thread for about fifteen hours. Couldn't be anything to do with being caught out about his video'ed signs, could it? Hmmmmm?

yes, and given I have just seen him post in another thread, it is not as if he is busy on another forum, or away from his comp...

TAM:)
 
This is nonsense.

And here is why:


robertflightpath.jpg

robertflightpath2.jpg



Robert definitively places the plane on the north side of the station and the bridge.

There is no refuting this from his account and I was not being deceptive by focusing in on the wrong sign.
 
False. Many people described the plane banking as it neared the Pentagon.

EXACTLY!

All of those accounts support the witness flight path and contradict the official flight path.

They would not be about to see the 360 degree turn from route 27.

Plus it is clear they are ALL claiming it banked just before allegedly slamming into the building.
 
Last edited:
Gotta go for now. I'm not avoiding anything.

If you watch Robert's interview again you will see that the other do not enter sign is nowhere near where he is pointing and that he specifically refers to the sign to the north of the bridge.

Peace!
Lyte
 

Back
Top Bottom