10 story hole in WTC 7

Status
Not open for further replies.
In my opinion, it is not a good idea to bring up other hi-rise building fires in comparison to the WTC events UNLESS those previous examples also suffered extensive damage from the impacts of commercial airliners, or if they, themselves were hit by falling debris from one of the tallest buildings in the world. If you have another example of a building fire pre-9/11 that meets these criteria, please share! Tks!
 
Last edited:
JBA and chipmunk:

You get what you deserve! What you deserve is unspeakable :eek: It would behoove you to shut your mouths. Did you ever ask yourself why it's possible for me to have a mature exchange of (radically different) views with some posters here (Ladewig, TAM) but not with you? Do you know what sets you apart? I know ;)
Grow up!
So why do you think I deserve something "unspeakable"? Have I graduated to "Zionist" now? Did I prick your fragile ego? Do you know anything about me, other than I think your views on Jews and Zionists is reprehensible? Tell me, what else do you know? Can you do that without insults? Let's find out!
 
Arus: Look at the video listed below in the "Fire on floor 12" section.
If you want to say that WTC 7 was 'fully involved' go right ahead but most people, after seeing that video, would think you a bit daft.

cloudshiprule: It is OK to compare the collapse of WTC 7 to other buildings that did not have debris damage because the debris damage played no part in the initiating event
that led to the collapse of WTC 7.

NIST Apx. L pg 36:
"If the initiating event was due to damage to the perimeter moment frame, then it would have started along the south or southwest facade."

"Analysis of the global structure indicates that the structure redistributed loads around the severed and damaged areas."

NIST makes no mention of lateral stress in its Summary, or anywhere else for that matter.
The rest of the L.3.2 Collapse Initiation Scenarios talks about fires.

*******************************************************

There were no diesel fuel fires or debris damage in the area of the initiating event* that led to the global collapse of WTC 7.

*NIST Apx. L pg 30 - 33
http://img96.imageshack.us.img96/1337/areaofinitiatingeventli5.png


References:

NIST Appendix L
http://wtc.nist.gov/progress_report_june04/appendixl.pdf
[note: pg 18 is pg 22 on the page counter]

NIST Final 4-5-05
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part%20IIC%20-%20WTC%207%20Collapse%20Final.pdf

FEMA Chapter 5
http:/www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf
[copy and paste in URL bar]


Debris damage:

- Southwest corner damage extended over floors 8 to 18 [NIST Apx. L pg 18]

- Damage starting at roof level....5 to 10 floors....near south west corner [NIST Apx. L pg 18]

- Large debris hole near center of south face around floor 14 [NIST Apx. L pg 18]
[just west of center*]

- South face damage, middle 1/4 - 1/3 width south face, floor 10 to ground [NIST Final 4-5-05 pg 15]

- No heavt debris in lobby area [NIST Apx. L pg 18]

- Damage...of core framing is not known [NIST Apx. L pg 51]

- Only damage to south wall on 9th floor at SW corner [FEMA Ch. 5 pg 20]

- 8th or 9th floor....2 elevator cars ejected into hallway north of elevator shaft, visible portion of south wall was gone....possible damage extended to the west [NIST Apx. L pg 18]


Explosion heard on floor 8
[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6475257160515133665&q=wtc7+new+footage
Start at 6:20 min.
[Warning: audio very loud and distorted, turn down volume before viewing]

* Steve Spak photograph with location of perimeter columns added graphically.
http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/9000/copyofwtc7holeanalysiscyk0.jpg


Looking from the south east corner of the south face:
Fire was seen on the 12th floor on the south face;
the face above the fire was covered with smoke [NIST Apx. L pg 24]
[the face below floor 12 was not covered with smoke]

No debris damage to the east 1/3 of the south face was reported

Debris would have to enter between columns 8 and 11 [Spak#] to damage core columns in the area of the initiating event.

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/3880/sfacegraphic3np6.jpg

********************************************************

Fires:

There were no diesel fuel fed fires in the east half of WTC 7 where the initial event, that led to the collapse, occurred.

FEMA pg 28
[bolding mine]

Fuel oil was distributed through the 5th floor in a double wall pipe.
A portion of the piping was in close proximity to Truss 1
However, there is no physical, photographic or other evidence to substantiate or refute the discharge of fuel oil from the piping system.

The following is, therefore, a hypothesis based on potential rather than demonstrated fact.
Assume that the distribution piping system was severed.....

The east generator room was in the north east corner of WTC 7 on the 5th floor.
The supply pipe for the east generator room was north of the wall that is on the north side of the mechanical room, 90' from the south side of the building. [FEMA pg 14 - 15]

If the generators [and the pump feeding fuel oil to them] were running, the louver vents would be open. [FEMA pg 29]

http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/937/e5pt8.jpg

If there was a fire in this room, smoke would be pouring out thru the vents.

********************************************************

Fire on floor 12

Form 11:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. it burned west to east across the south side

From 2:00 to 3:00 p.m., the fire progresses north along east side
http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/7555/e40rv.jpg

About 3:00 p.m., it reached the north side, east of center, and spread in both directions
http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/6500/n5pq6.jpg
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/5236/n6oj1.jpg

By 4:45 the fire on floor 12 had burned out
http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/2337/copyofwtc716474jw7rf2.jpg
Video of north side after fire on floor 12 had burned out
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=1548030539


Other fires:

11:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.: fire on floor 22 on south side
About 12:15 p.m.: Fire on floor 7 at west wall, toward the south side
2:00 to 2:20 p.m.: fire on floor 11 at SE corner, progressing north
Around 3:00 p.m.: fire on floor 7 near middle of north side
Sometime later, fire on floors 8 and 13
Fire on floor 8 eventually burned to NE corner and moved to east face

[NIST Apx. L pg 22 - 26]

********************************************************

The reports of fire to the east part of WTC 7 are not going to change in the final report.
The reports given are clear, the times are accurate enough to track the progression of the fires.
 
Last edited:
Christopher7, I'm interested to see if you agree with this statement:

Whatever conspirators were involved in 9/11 somehow knew that the debris from the North Tower would cause just enough damage to fool the scientific community into thinking there was nothing suspicious about WTC 7's collapse but not quite enough damage to where explosives would no longer be needed to bring it down.
 
If you want to say that WTC 7 was 'fully involved' go right ahead but most people, after seeing that video, would think you a bit daft.

WE don't say that, Chris. The firefighters do. Are they "a bit daft?"

Since you insist that they're wrong, why don't you ask them what they saw?

Or are you just another internet coward who gets his kicks out of making baseless accusations against the FDNY?

So what's it going to be, Chris? Are you going to talk to the people who were there and tell them what they really saw?

No more stalling. Yes or no?
 
It is the difference between Chris' definition of 'fully involved' and a FF's definition of it.

From what I gather the FF definition involves flames and/or heavy smoke throughout the building.

WTC 7 qualifies in that regard.
 
Christopher7, I'm interested to see if you agree with this statement:

Whatever conspirators were involved in 9/11 somehow knew that the debris from the North Tower would cause just enough damage to fool the scientific community into thinking there was nothing suspicious about WTC 7's collapse but not quite enough damage to where explosives would no longer be needed to bring it down.

I'd say they must have, otherwise it would real embarrassing to have a building undamaged by debris (not creaking and groaning) and perhaps not on fire to just collapse.
 
Listen up, now!

Many years ago, today, Jesus the Christ, the Messiah and Son of God, willingly carried the sins of all humanity, past, present and future, to His Cross at Calvary.

He was sent there and to us by God, His Father. He obeyed His Father out of Love for Him and for us!

God has a message for all humanity. You can find it here:

http://novalight.org

If the message is not for you, please forward it to someone else.

I am just the messenger.

(I will not make any other posts on this thread today. It is a day of Remembrance. "Remember your Creator before the silver cord is loosed". Jesus the Christ said: "No one comes to the Father except by Me".)


GodSend,
If you continue to post these links in this manner, and repeating posts cross-threads, you will receive a warning for spamming.
Additionally, please refrain from religious commentary in sub-fora other than the 'Religion and Philosophy' sub-forum.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Listen up, now!

Many years ago, today, Jesus the Christ, the Messiah and Son of God, willingly carried the sins of all humanity, past, present and future, to His Cross at Calvary.

He was sent there and to us by God, His Father. He obeyed His Father out of Love for Him and for us!

God has a message for all humanity. You can find it here:

http://novalight.org

If the message is not for you, please forward it to someone else.

I am just the messenger.

(I will not make any other posts on this thread today. It is a day of Remembrance. "Remember your Creator before the silver cord is loosed". Jesus the Christ said: "No one comes to the Father except by Me".)
Don't spam your posts, Peter.
 
Since reading my directions was obviously too much bother, I've numbered the windows on each photo so they are in sync with the matching floors.

It should be quite clear that the NIST photo shows significant corner damage on floors that are intact in the comparison photo.

Click on the thumbnail image to get a full view.

http://img45.imageshack.us/my.php?image=wtc7cornerdamage3rnk5.jpg][qimg]http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/9200/wtc7cornerdamage3rnk5.th.jpg[/qimg]

MM

Not quite. You can see the corner of the building is damaged at #8. Four floors below that is where the gash starts. That vertical line below the lowest smoke cloud (#14) is NOT the corner of the building, it is interior structural columns. The majority of the gash is obscured by the squarish feature on the roof of the building nearby (#16).
 
Last edited:
Not quite. You can see the corner of the building is damaged at #8. Four floors below that is where the gash starts. That vertical line below the lowest smoke cloud (#14) is NOT the corner of the building, it is interior structural columns. The majority of the gash is obscured by the squarish feature on the roof of the building nearby (#16).

We've also been debating this on the LC forums and here's a quick image I did to illustrate the absolute minimum of corner damage I can see:

http://xs314.xs.to/xs314/07145/p12663692-line2.jpg

edit: you might be surprised but from my preliminary analysis this image corroborates floors 8-18 being damaged with approximately the same level of damage, it's hard to judge because of the angle of the shot but you can count windows to see the upper extent of the damage.
 
Last edited:
The NIST hypothesis is full of "if" and "may have"

Well of course. Unlike you, they can't make up reality and convince themselves of their own pedantry.

They don't know if it is possible for the office fires to cause the collapse.

No, they know. Office fires DO causes collapses.

On the other hand, the Caracus towers burned out of control for 17 hours and completely gutted most of the top 20 floors.
It did not collapse.

Well, I guess this proves it, then.

No one knows weather or not office fires can cause a modern steel frame building to collapse because it has never happened.

And this proves what ? Oh, wait. What about other steel buildings ? Did you forget those, or did you ignore them voluntarily ?

WTC 7 was not fully involved.

And we know that fire doesn't do smack unless it coveres every inch of a floor.

And you still haven't answered me about the 47-floor hole in 7 WTC.
 
Listen up, now!

Many years ago, today, Jesus the Christ, the Messiah and Son of God, willingly carried the sins of all humanity, past, present and future, to His Cross at Calvary.

Unholy mother of hell!!! We have a new theory about 7 WTC's collapse!

Oh, wait. You were just preaching. Sorry. Carry on.
 
Damn I wish I had my camera.

I'm sorry but I have to mention what i saw today. I was driving down Woodbridge ave in Edison NJ today and what do i see? a guy in a wool cap dragging a life sized varnished wooden cross down the sidewalk over his shoulder. Funniest thing was the pair of wheels on the bottom of the cross that looked like they were salvaged from one of those lawn fertilizer spreaders. Hey you don't want to damage your cross while dragging it in front of a bar do you?
 
WE don't say that, Chris. The firefighters do. Are they "a bit daft?"
I think they were looking at WTC 7 from West and Vesey.

You seem to think that the FDNY thought WTC 7 was 'fully involved'.

Such is not the case.

Chiefs Nigro, Fellini and Hayden did not say it was 'fully involved'.

Lieutenant James McGlynn, Assistant Chief Harry Meyers said that WTC 7 was 'fully involved'

Firefighter Tiernach Cassidy said "I saw it late in the day and like the first seven floors were on fire. It looked like heavy fire on seven floors. It was fully engulfed, that whole building.
[this statement is in conflict with itself]

Deputy Chief Nick Visconti "...the fire was going on virtually every floor"
"I remember standing just where West and Vesey start to rise....."

Lieutenant Robert LaRocca "...fire on nearly all floors"

So, we have 3 firefighters saying that WTC 7 was 'fully involved'
and 2 saying fire on nearly all, or virtually every floor.

These frames are from a video taken late in the afternoon.

wtc79ks1.jpg


copyofwtc7n448bv4.jpg


You can call this 'fully involved' if you want.
 
I'm sorry but I have to mention what i saw today. I was driving down Woodbridge ave in Edison NJ today and what do i see? a guy in a wool cap dragging a life sized varnished wooden cross down the sidewalk over his shoulder. Funniest thing was the pair of wheels on the bottom of the cross that looked like they were salvaged from one of those lawn fertilizer spreaders. Hey you don't want to damage your cross while dragging it in front of a bar do you?

Well that certainly added a lot to the debate.

MM
 
you would be a prime example of that.



This reminds me of a poster on BAUT who adamantly insisted that the Pentagon security camera was crystal clear in showing the the inbound aircraft was an F-4.

You can take the NIST photo and use photoshop to attempt to deskew it all you want it will not further your cause to prove that the NIST photo is faked.

There are details in each photo which will be visible in one but not the other due to sun angle, smoke, camera/wall angle and the bulge/lean in the building above the gash and there is no photoshop magic that you can do to make both pictures show the exact same details. there is enough detail in both pictures though to conclusively state that they show the same damage to the building.

In http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/9466/wtc7cornerdamage2zq4.jpg you can see that the window column on floor 16 is very much askew. This is one illustration of the bulge in the building. We also know that the west wall of the building meets the south wall at an angle that is not 90 degrees. The NIST photo is taken from the NW making the angle between camera and west wall even more oblique than if the west wall was at 90 deg to the south and north walls. With the building also leaning or bulging the damaged SW corner gets even more out of line with the camera. This will all serve to obscure details of the SW corner.

However, when I look at the NIST photo there is at least 3 floors relativly intact below floor 18 and as many as 4. That jives with the other photo that shows damage to the actual corner starting at floor 14 below which the corner is not visible due to smoke and the intervening building.

I used no photoshop treatment other than preserving in .tif format to avoid digital loss.

You see what you wish to see and there is nothing I can do about that.

The truth is inescapable regardless of how much you wish to deny it.

MM
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom