• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC7: The Twoofer Epiphany.

Gravy said:
Open minded? That phrase may have a different meaning in your country. Here, "open minded" doesn't mean "immune to reason." Allow me to remind you of some of your first posts here.

einsteen being open minded about Twin Towers having demolitons explosives built in.




einsteen being open minded about his claim that a plume of smoke larger than WTC 7 rose in front of that building before the towers collapsed.




After being corrected about the plume for a second time, einsteen remains open minded.



einsteen being open minded about flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, and what the Pentagon may have been made of.

einsteen keeping an open mind about the laws of physics, and about magic.




einsteen keeping an open mind about Larry Silverstein.
Click to expand...

Your point?

You have to wonder about a leader that choses Gravy as his No1 choice of identification!

Melted animal fat that ultimates produces clogged arteries and uses an avatar that suggests masturbation even when it's socially inappropriate.

Mark Roberts...you and the rest of your ass kissers have nothing but smoke and quotes and you acuse anyone who asks for more of being nut cases.

MM


Do not personalize your discussion with insults and incivility. I suggest you re-read your membership agreement concerning civility in these forums toward fellow members.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jmercer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
More "not-niceness". Ok. Since you have repeatedly crossed the line, despite my calling you on it, I feel you are entitled, from here on in, to what ever insults and shaite get thrown at you.

TAM:(
 
Miragememories said:
Mark Roberts...you and the rest of your ass kissers have nothing but smoke and quotes and you acuse anyone who asks for more of being nut cases.
Click to expand...
Oh, and... reported for a blatant ad hominem attack against specific and non-specific members of this forum.

Miragememories said:
Actually my name is a good description of the typical JREF view of 9/11!
Click to expand...
Would you agree that it is your "No1 choice of identification"?
 
alexg said:
No, I had not seen those. Interesting, will study them later.

But Gravy. What is that channel running up the building? It looks too clean to be the 'hole' and too high.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/118354602fd1ce5d19.jpg
Click to expand...

wtc7 wasn't square:
wtc_footprint_2.jpg
 
Last edited:
T.A.M. said:
More "not-niceness". Ok. Since you have repeatedly crossed the line, despite my calling you on it, I feel you are entitled, from here on in, to what ever insults and shaite get thrown at you.

TAM:(
Click to expand...

Any excuse to sink to the lowest levels eh T.A.M.?

I responded to your lack of content.

If you wish to make a point..then make it dammit!

If your just going to join the JREF chorus, expect the kind of response I gave you!

MM
 
ok, fine....

The comments I have been making, are directed at you MM, because you seemed to be in agreement with the thread I created calling for more civility and less name calling, insults, etc...

So I am calling you a hypocrite, because if you agree with the afore mentioned thread, and then start name calling and insulting others as you have here, than you are such.

Is that "stated" enough for you...is that more explicative?

TAM:)
 
Regnad Kcin said:
Fine, Miragememories, but I don't recall you or anyone else providing evidence for your claim.

What's that? You have none?
Click to expand...
Wait, wait, I'm being handed an important bulletin...

It seems that Miragememories still has no proof for his/her claims. Once again, not a scintilla of supporting material.

Stay tuned for no details. And now back to our regular programming.
 
Miragememories said:
Any excuse to sink to the lowest levels eh T.A.M.?

I responded to your lack of content.

If you wish to make a point..then make it dammit!

If your just going to join the JREF chorus, expect the kind of response I gave you!

MM
Click to expand...

I didnt say I would name call, I said if others choose to do so, in reply to you rnumerous insults here, than you deserve it.

One doesnt have to be "textbook" explicative in his posts to make his point. I prefer to let people read between the lines.

If I believe in what others have said, and it seems most JREFers do, what is wrong with that?

TAM:)
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
Oh, and... reported for a blatant ad hominem attack against specific and non-specific members of this forum.


Would you agree that it is your "No1 choice of identification"?
Click to expand...

Do people really talk like that in where you come from?

I'm not attacking anyone.

I'm responding. The response varies with the type of reply. Act like a 'dick' and you'll get the appropriate response. Show some respect and civility and I'll act accordingly.

MM
 
Miragememories said:
Do people really talk like that in where you come from?

I'm not attacking anyone.

I'm responding. The response varies with the type of reply. Act like a 'dick' and you'll get the appropriate response. Show some respect and civility and I'll act accordingly.
Click to expand...
You didn't answer my question. Would you agree that Miragememories is your "No1 choice of identification"?
 
T.A.M. said:
ok, fine....

The comments I have been making, are directed at you MM, because you seemed to be in agreement with the thread I created calling for more civility and less name calling, insults, etc...

So I am calling you a hypocrite, because if you agree with the afore mentioned thread, and then start name calling and insulting others as you have here, than you are such.

Is that "stated" enough for you...is that more explicative?

TAM:)
Click to expand...

The problem T.A.M. is that I get swarmed here and out of sync with my responses.

The post of yours that I responded to was "WTC7 is their Nessie."

That was a 'non-response' and a cheap shot at that!

Are you suggesting that NIST would have a difficult time disputing Nessie?

Come on. Treat me nice and I will behave accordingly. If everyone here is acting like a pig than I'll respond in the language they apparently enjoy.

MM
 
MM:

My comment was a metaphor, so to speak. WTC7 is the piece above all pieces of alleged evidence of an "inside" job that cannot be proven or disproven at this moment in time.

So like The Lockness Monster, which cannot be proven or disproven (although come to think of it, recently they used sonar to make the likelihood of her existence much lower).

TAM:)
 
Miragememories said:
Any excuse to sink to the lowest levels eh T.A.M.?

I responded to your lack of content.

If you wish to make a point..then make it dammit!

If your just going to join the JREF chorus, expect the kind of response I gave you!

MM
Click to expand...
Typical lack of fact attack
 
Last edited:
T.A.M. said:
I didnt say I would name call, I said if others choose to do so, in reply to you rnumerous insults here, than you deserve it.

One doesnt have to be "textbook" explicative in his posts to make his point. I prefer to let people read between the lines.

If I believe in what others have said, and it seems most JREFers do, what is wrong with that?

TAM:)
Click to expand...

I'm just saying your idea of between the lines is my idea of across the ocean.

You are entitled to your beliefs of course. I know I would feel bad if I was labeled as someone who had a predictable opinion. I realize there is comfort in knowing a large group is supporting you.

I'm not asking you to agree with me T.A.M.. I'm just saying the majority isn't always right and that people with opposing views don't deserve the slanderous responses that they receive here.

MM
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom