I agree. And my answer is no.But the real question is: Should there be a test, or other qualification, for voters?
I think every voter should be required to prove he is who he says he is.But the real question is: Should there be a test, or other qualification, for voters?
But the real question is: Should there be a test, or other qualification, for voters?
Stupid test, I didn't recognize Pelosi or Roberts and it gave me a C.![]()
Those were poor pictures of both them. I've seen Roberts plenty of times but it didn't look like him. That's a bad picture of Pelosi too.
I didn't know four of the celebrities either, so what. They should actually reduce your score if you know what Christina Aguilera looks like, I've heard the name but I could care less. Madonna sure looks different. I've never seen Paris Hilton without sunglasses on. Why should I care about these people again?
How about a written test explaining how the US government works. That would be a better idea then asking me to pick out pictures.![]()
I agree.I think every voter should be required to prove he is who he says he is.
I agree.BPSCG said:And while there shouldn't be any other requirements beyond the Constitutional ones,
I certainly agree that I wish the electorate would become more educated in the pertinent issues, or just more educated in general. I'm still of the opinion that the pitfalls of any education tests as a prerequisite to voting outweigh the benefits.BPSCG said:I think there are a lot of people who have no business voting.
Excuses, excuses...
I think every voter should be required to prove he is who he says he is.
And while there shouldn't be any other requirements beyond the Constitutional ones, I think there are a lot of people who have no business voting. Washington Post ran an article in their Sunday magazine a month or two before the 2004 presidential election profiling a guy who hadn't voted in years. Neither had several of his friends. At one point, one of his friends, talking about the race, referred to "Bush and... uh... that guy running against him."
At least they know they have no business voting. But Thomas Jefferson would be appalled.
I have often thought that nothing would do more extensive good at small expense than the establishment of a small circulating library in every county, to consist of a few well-chosen books, to be lent to the people of the country, under such regulations as would secure their safe return in due time.
--Thomas Jefferson to John Wyche, 1809.
Suh! I wuz boan in the sovrun commonwealth of dear Kintuck, and I take umbrage, UMBRAGE I SAY!, at yoh insinuation that a man so honruble, so pyure, so upstandin as the rat honruble Senatore MuhKonnil would evah stoop so low as to sully his ivery finguhtips on that libertine instrument of Satan, the pyeannuh.For McConnel I picked pianist. I figured maybe he was one of those geeks who sings political satire songs.
Hell, don't feel too bad (I guess you don't, hence the smilie). How many 'Murricans do you think could name Canada's prime minister?I got a D.
I suppose that isn't bad for a Canuck that doesn't watch the news.
I got all the celebrities.![]()