Simple Challenge For Bigfoot Supporters

Status
Not open for further replies.
About Kitakaze's list in post #2848:

I live in Michigan, not that far from Ohio, and yet I've never seen a Footsie that I know of. Why so many sightings in two densely-populated and throughly timbered-off states? 190 in Ohio alone!

Well, the answer is simple: The same few Squatches are seen repeatedly! They're flaunting themselves! Teasing! Flashing! Waving yoohoo from the edge of the woods! "Betcha can't catch me, nyah-nyah NYAH nyah!" and they're off into the brush.

Talk about attention whores! And here we're told that they're Wise Ones!

Oh, and Kitakaze? You're just an old spoilsport meanie.
:drinkspit: I love it! Sasquatches are such hams! :mdance: :monkeyr: Wouldn't it be hilarious if the first sasquatch captured just up and said in a Buddy Cole lisp 'so, where's my kiss, lover?' Thank Sweet Zombie Jesus for Michigan. Detroit, birthplace of techno!
 
Publicly denounce bigfoot-tipping by the youth of Iowa?

Ask the public not to feed him corn, due to allergies?

Place bigfoot crossing on all farms to avoid death by corn thrashers? :p

I don't have an answer because I haven't given Iowa much thought (nor do I plan to in the future).
Touche! Seriously, though, why not give much thought to Iowa?
 
Because Bigfoot is a religion, not a real animal. I think some skeptics and believers haven't fully come to terms with this. Bigfootery deserves to be granted the same respect and legitimacy as any other religion. Skeptics and believers should realize that their domains do not overlap any more than science does with religion.

I tend to disagree. Religion makes quite a number of verifiable claims.
 
Here is the thread (dated May, 2002). We didn't talk about his sighting when we first met, but he was impressive none-the-less!
Doh! I've read this! I know this! I read this back when I was a lurker at the BFF. More on this later.
Thank you for the well-wishes, we've been married for almost two wonderful years! Bob doesn't post much anywhere anymore...too much else going on.
2 years? I'm gonna have to work on my stalking skills.:D My ridiculously gorgeous wife and I will be celebrating 3 years in May. We have a little super-model son, a year and four months old.

Well then, back to it!
 
Thank Sweet Zombie Jesus for Michigan. Detroit, birthplace of techno!

Ted Nugent will be the first to take Bigfoot. It will be with a bow from his tree-stand.

"Nuge, this Bigfoot only has one leg."
"What an idiot! You know I hunt for food. Next you will tell me that those atheist scientists need both legs to accept the truth."
 
Doh! I've read this! I know this! I read this back when I was a lurker at the BFF. More on this later.

Well, like I said, Bob can address any comments you have by posting on the BFF. He's more than capable of speaking for himself.

2 years? I'm gonna have to work on my stalking skills.:D My ridiculously gorgeous wife and I will be celebrating 3 years in May. We have a little super-model son, a year and four months old.

Well, then, your stalker status is hereby revoked until you can get the basic skills down. ;)

Congrats on the gorgeous wife (my husband knows how you feel) and the sweet little one. Children have the unique ability to remind us what is really important in this world.
 
Last edited:
If I wasn't a Vulcan, I'd be getting misty right about now.

Glad to see that we've all shifted gears to get more out of this thread.
 
Hey Vulcan, we're getting together later to sing Kum bi ya, wanna join in???

Um, is the Achilles Heel Iowa or the husband/wife report?
 
Last edited:
Ted Nugent will be the first to take Bigfoot. It will be with a bow from his tree-stand.

"Nuge, this Bigfoot only has one leg."
"What an idiot! You know I hunt for food. Next you will tell me that those atheist scientists need both legs to accept the truth."
William, my maudlin friend, if The Nuge can't do it then who ever will? I was hoping it might be Mantracker.
 
I tend to disagree. Religion makes quite a number of verifiable claims.

:D I called Bigfoot a god because it is. Bigfootery has every hallmark of a religion. Bigfoot is not at all "just like any other animal"... it's like a god. It's a classic unfalsifiable. Skeptics say it will never be found, while the Bigfooters say they already did. Saying that it will be confirmed is to talk about the return of Jesus. The sightings, footprint casts and the films are the oil droplets flowing from the Virgin Mary statue.
 
:D I called Bigfoot a god because it is. Bigfootery has every hallmark of a religion. Bigfoot is not at all "just like any other animal"... it's like a god. It's a classic unfalsifiable. Skeptics say it will never be found, while the Bigfooters say they already did. Saying that it will be confirmed is to talk about the return of Jesus. The sightings, footprint casts and the films are the oil droplets flowing from the Virgin Mary statue.
'They', William, 'they'. We're really going to have to discuss this at Mass.:D
 
Since there's no way to keep track of the number of bigfooties roaming NA, anything and everything can be speculated.

Is bigfoot facing extinction? Why, of course, man is aggressively expanding into wilderness areas and competing directly with the big hairy fellow.

Is the bigfoot population exploding? But of course. In California the number of bigfoot encounters reported in ALL the years prior to 1957 was 11. In 2001 alone there were 35, so obviously bigfoot are more plentiful now than they were 50 years ago. Of the 40 California counties reporting bigfoot activities on the BFRO, ALL show recent reports, falling on a timeline somewhere between June 2000, and February 2007.

If bigfoot is so tough to track, difficult to photorgraph, impossible to classify/catalogue, and facing impending extinction, how come they've been spotted in 40 counties in California over the past seven years?

RayG

Two words: Transdimensional shape-shifter
 
kitakaze wrote:
Do you know why no such invitation was extended to you?
I don't care why. Get over yourself, kitakaze.

I will readily admit to having insulted you, been hostile to you, and accused you of various things.
That's a good start. Now...if you can only get some help!

What I would like for you to do is to first provide evidence to support the first statement of the above post or retract it.
I can't help you out, there...I'm sorry. The statement stands as stated.
Feel free to refute it....it's an OPEN forum.

But, second and most importantly, state and provide evidence to support it that you have never engaged in those exact same behaviours you above mention here on this board. Please keep in mind if you try a 'they started it' argument, I have a long memory and no qualms about digging up the posts myself.
Happy digging, kitty!! :)

If you are not willing to do so then I thoroughly suggest that you drop this line of implication as it will most certainly backfire on you.
I've already made my point. Your hostility is a sign of a problem....with you. :D

Finally, in an unrelated matter, you have been suspiciously silent on the matter since submitting the anecdote of the married couple for us to consider as evidence. I confronted you and asked if you were referring to Hairy Man and that if you were not to supply us with a link to the post and board to prove it. I have more than once since brought it up. Why so silent?
I was asked not to say anything more about it, that's all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom