ThePentaCON releases trailer

jhunter1163 said:
One thing I've never been able to get a good explanation for is, how could you knock down light poles at the height of rush hour on one of the nation's busiest freeways and not have anyone notice?

I doubt I'll find any answers in this video. *sigh*
Click to expand...


Actually, what needs even more explanation is: who thought that wavy credits would be a good idea? Perhaps they hope to make their audience so seasick that no one notices that the film has no merit.
 
jhunter1163 said:
If I wanted to watch trailer trash, I'd put on Springer.
Click to expand...

265445d36ca668343.jpg

This is Trailer Trash

265445d36ca6c9d51.jpg

What you meant is this; a Trashy Trailer
 
I noticed in the CG flyover sequence from the end of the trailer the plane is diving in from what seems like over 100 feet over the CITGO. (That seems the only way the plane could have avoided hitting the light poles on the alleged north path) then climb up to miss the Pentagon.
I have two questions.
1. Can a 757 make the kind of a manuver at the speed depicted in the CG sequence? Those things don't exactly turn on a dime ya know.

2. Could the witness have seen the airplane at all from that angle from under the CITGO canopy. It seem to me that they could not have seen the airplane untill it was well past the canopy.

All the witness testimony say the plane came in low and fast. The CG sequence has the plane coming in at a higher angle then climbing up again.
Like an inverted parabola.
 
uruk said:
I noticed in the CG flyover sequence from the end of the trailer the plane is diving in from what seems like over 100 feet over the CITGO. (That seems the only way the plane could have avoided hitting the light poles on the alleged north path) then climb up to miss the Pentagon.
I have two questions.
1. Can a 757 make the kind of a manuver at the speed depicted in the CG sequence? Those things don't exactly turn on a dime ya know.

2. Could the witness have seen the airplane at all from that angle from under the CITGO canopy. It seem to me that they could not have seen the airplane untill it was well past the canopy.

All the witness testimony say the plane came in low and fast. The CG sequence has the plane coming in at a higher angle then climbing up again.
Like an inverted parabola.
Click to expand...

But...but...it's B[rule8]N'!!!!!!!11!!!1!
 
Actual trailer:

Pretty dumb to have the words shaking and vibrating.

I think they are trying to go for that 'Manhunt' style effect seen in that games menus (is it manhunt?). Real shocking and disturbing, makes you feel weird. It looks dumb the way they make it 'wobble' and its on a black background. It is annoying and it goes hand in hand with the website design these guys have on conspiracy sites. Whats the go with the music, the loop for the repeat is out. Its mega amateur and even guys using flash can produce a much more asthetic piece.


Actual Facts if any:
OK, the first thing I notice is why do they show the flyover part as if its the real thing? we have no idea of the speed of the plane in the animation and its not even close to the same trajectory as 77. How can anyone take it seriously if your going to show? You'll need a pretty convincing model detailing the exact flight path/speed/ascent etc of the official flight before anyone would take the results seriously. Most people already think its silly.
 
I can't wait for the whole video to be released. I bet that even the "Truth Movement" will reject the video.

Isn't this the movie that was supposed to be released by the end of January? In the middle of February all that we have is a little 2 minute video that explains nothing.
 
I really hope their final movie offers something. I have this annoying habbit of feeling embarrassed for people lol. I'm not going to judge the whole movie based on the 2 minute trailer, but if that's the best they've got... I would have to say this is a bit of a disappointment.I look forward to seeing how they explain:Fallen LightpolesPlane DebrisThe DoubleTree VideoNo Eye-Witnesses stating that the plane flew OVER the buildingRemains of victims on Flight 77 inside the PentagonAnd much, much more.
 
The Doc said:
I really hope their final movie offers something. I have this annoying habbit of feeling embarrassed for people lol. I'm not going to judge the whole movie based on the 2 minute trailer, but if that's the best they've got... I would have to say this is a bit of a disappointment.I look forward to seeing how they explain:Fallen LightpolesPlane DebrisThe DoubleTree VideoNo Eye-Witnesses stating that the plane flew OVER the buildingRemains of victims on Flight 77 inside the PentagonAnd much, much more.
Click to expand...

That's the whole point. I'll bet they DON'T attempt to explain those things. It's the same old schtick. We don't have to prove what happened, only that it didn't happen the way the Government said it did.

My guess is they will attempt to show that the light poles were cut and set-up by "whoever" using SKATEBOARDERS, for one thing. Most of their earth shattering proof will be the eyewitnesses that state the plane flew north of the Citgo, thus disproving the official story. Then they will discredit the taxi driver with Lytes brilliant dissertation of how it was impossible, possibly using his infamous, "my see-saw analogy renders any need for calculations moot."

Of course, they will ignore the physical evidence at the Pentagon and the innumerable eyewitnesses that saw the crash. And, of course they have ZERO witnesses that saw a flyover.

Other than that, I'm sure it will be quite convinceing. I don't doubt that it will immediately cause a world wide uproar and result in a full Congressional investigation.
 
The Doc said:
I really hope their final movie offers something. I have this annoying habbit of feeling embarrassed for people lol. I'm not going to judge the whole movie based on the 2 minute trailer, but if that's the best they've got... I would have to say this is a bit of a disappointment.I look forward to seeing how they explain:Fallen LightpolesPlane DebrisThe DoubleTree VideoNo Eye-Witnesses stating that the plane flew OVER the buildingRemains of victims on Flight 77 inside the PentagonAnd much, much more.
Click to expand...

That's all simple to explain.

Fallen Light Poles-Bombs were placed in the bases, then once they fell some random people came and cut them in half. Duh!

Eye-witneses-A hologram struck the Pentagon, and Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon by being covered up by a hologram of the sky.

The remains of the victims were also planted.

Basically, Flight 77 was cloaked so no one could see it, then a hologram flew the real path and a bomb just blew up at the Pentagon to form the shape of an airplane, then all of the debris was planted.
It's so obvious.
 
This trailer doesn't tell us anything we haven't seen already - except for their use of annoying music and wavy credits.

Not even a hint of actual testimony. If this was an actual product I might actually buy, I'd be very not impressed.
 
I believe that I mentioned to LT or Merc or some other like idiot that not only do they have no witnesses from the highway, CITGO or the whole incoming area, that stated that they saw the plane fly over the Pentagon but neither do they have anyone from across the river stating they saw a large , fast and very low flying aircraft come from the direction of the Pentagon. this despite the fact that anyone across the river from the Pentagon would hear the sound of the explosion and naturally turn in that direction and see the friggin big aircraft.
 
PentagonHit.jpg


We should be able to determine how soon after the impact this shot of the Pentagon was taken. It's a frame from this video, and from the rest of the video I've figured out that the video starts filming at this point in space:

PHMap.jpg


Any plane flying over the Pentagon should have been seen by these people. In fact, I believe any plane flying over the Pentagon should have been in this frame, which completely debunks the PentaCon's flyover theory.
 
chippy said:
He says 13 people in the video
Click to expand...

I think we have a bigger mystery now. He says 13 witnesses, then shows the official flight path, then shows the Citgo witness flightpath. That means that we're now missing 12 flight paths. It's not easy to hide a flight path- if we can find the missing 12 then the case will be solved.
 
By the way, regarding the light poles...I pointed out back at my journal that you can clearly see that the material in these light poles was bent at the point of "impact". If an explosion actually caused the steel to bend, it would have to be quite massive. In other words, people sure as hell would have seen such an explosion.

It doesn't make sense to say that they were already bent when they were put up since the material is too deformed to look normal.
 
Now just stop for a moment and consider that Lyte has stated that there will be a 4 HOUR version. Can you imagine the absolute horror of that stretched out that long?

Regardless of the final format, I'm pretty sure that the full movie and the trailer both contain the same amount of "facts". That being said, why don't they just stop now....
 
Their whole attitude towards this is completely repulsive, and very telling of their intentions:


First, they don't bring their "evidence" to the authorities, instead they keep this information for months to themselves.

They never contact any news outlet, any media.

They never contact the families of the victims.

As they "compile" their evidence, they come to a skeptics forum, known to be very good at debunking 9/11 conspiracies, to taunt the non believers about their new found evidence, which they never produce.

They edit their "evidence" (interviews) into a film narrative.

And now they're releasing a "teaser" of their movie... which wil be release on the internet.


Is that really the way real investigators work? Are they really after the truth, or just their own personal gratification?

:eusa_think:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom