• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

(UK) The Daily Mail joins the circus!

mailman

Critical Thinker
M
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
341
Sorry if this has been covered already...but Im never surprised when so called main stream British newspapers run claptrap as fact!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...tml?in_article_id=435265&in_page_id=1811&ct=5

Given there are only 11 comments on this article Im going to assume this hasnt been covered here yet?

Im all for a full on truth assault...oh wait, that term is already trade marked by the cult of the 9/11! :D

Ill say it again, for a media supposedly owned exclusively by the jooooooooos...they really did get a raw deal! :D

Regards

Mailman
 
Yawm....the movie is produced by a bunch of [insert bad words here] and is short on fact!

Then again, its always good to see how these so called "truth seekers" value free speech. Take a look at the loose change forums and ask yourself, where are all the people gone who dont agree with Dylan Avery and his "free speech radicals"?

Ill tell you where those who dont agree with this so called movie director are...they are all banned! If you dare post anything that disagrees with Mr Avery not only are you banned with lightning speed BUT your posting or thread is deleted in its entirety.

You see, the so called truth movement is all for freedom of speech...just as long as that speech supports their myopic point of view (that GW is responsible, not religious fundy terrorists!).

I could go on and on about the lies, distortion of facts and quote mining but when you are dealing with members of the 9/11 cult, the truth is hardly what they are interested in.

Mailman
JREF
Click to expand...
Just in case my comments get lost in the avalanch of stuff coming their way :)

Mailman
 
Meh, I'm just surprised that it took the Daily Hate-Mail so long to jump on the bandwagon, they've been claiming that MI5/MI6 and TEH MOSSAD where behind Dianna Spenser's death for the past 10 years.
OTOH, supporting the troofers surprises me in one respect, ten daily mail likes to blame almost everything on immigrants and Muslims in particular, I wonder what made hem decade that is thins case, the Muslims are innocent? I wouldn't be surprised if, deep down, someone in the editorial staff at the Hate Mail thinks that there is no way Muslims would be able to pull off something like 9/11 without help from white, Christian, men.
 
The Daily Mail has to be my least favourite paper. At least the other trashy papers in the Uk let you know not to take them seriously, by having naked girls on page 3 and excruciating puns as the title of every article.
 
All the media is run by the government and they're covering up 9/11...Untill something positive is sead about the loser movement.

Of course all the media is doing is making them think like they arn't covering anything up by giving them their little piece.
 
I made a post:

"Conspiracy Theories cannot stand up to the facts. They might like to believe that they can, but they cannot. I hate to use the argument from authority here, but there are NO professional/structural engineers who have been asked about the towers that think it was a controlled demolition. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), released their report on what caused the towers to fall - over 200 scientists worked on this report, so in order to believe the 9/11 conspiracy theorists, you'd have to believe that these 200 scientists were 'in on it'.

9/11 was a terrorist attack. The conspiracy is George Bush's use of 9/11 to promote his agenda."
 
brodski said:
Meh, I'm just surprised that it took the Daily Hate-Mail so long to jump on the bandwagon, they've been claiming that MI5/MI6 and TEH MOSSAD where behind Dianna Spenser's death for the past 10 years.
Click to expand...
I thought that was the Express. Has the Wail been running it as well? Not that it'd surprise me, they're pretty much woo central.
 
"The official version is that the buildings collapsed because their steel columns were melted by the heat from the fuel fires of the two crashed planes."

Wow, the piece is peppered with little gems of stupidity like this.
 
One glaring error which has debunked before - location of fighters

The MAIL mentions McGuire AFB in central NJ (Wrightstown) - problem is that
McGuire is not a fighter base! It supports transport aircraft/ refueling
tankers/naval patrol aircraft - no fighters. Here is link with list of
squadrons based there.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/mcguire.htm
 
I was asked to contribute to a recruitment article in the Mail a while ago, and refused on principle. It's the worst kind of sensationalist BS hate-filled rag, and it should come as NO surprise that they would choose to jump on the 9/11 bandwagon. I just can't face going there at the moment, it's too depressing. Talk about an uphill struggle; MOST of the readership will be P'Doh's at worst and casual LIHOPers at best, and will care not a jot for any truth that might threaten their narrow "little England" world-view.
 
Mojo said:
I thought that was the Express. Has the Wail been running it as well? Not that it'd surprise me, they're pretty much woo central.
Click to expand...
You're right you know, it's the express who jumped on the Diana bandwaggon, the Mail was too busy with the MMR conspiricy theories.
 
I read the article this morning and have let my temper subside.

What a waste of ink. No research, no balance and for the author of the article, no credability.
 
Burrell said:
I read the article this morning and have let my temper subside.
What a waste of ink. No research, no balance and for the author of the article, no credability.
Click to expand...

haven't read the article myself but do kinda welcome this. this mass airing of wooness may spur other more reputable organs (guardian, times etc) to counter the idiocy. the inate one-upmanship amongst the british press may serve scepticism in the end. or am i hoping for too much?

BV
 
Last edited:
I'd suggest that as many people as possible give at least a brief response to the article. It might only take a few seconds, but it's worth doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom