432 shows harmony of Sun, Moon, Earth Design

[Foster Zygote]

try again Wollery, I must have missed seeing that post, too many insincere ones inbetween and too many non studying types just posting off the tops of their heads because they refuse to concentrate a few minutes much less a few hours. They think they know it all, and so rightly is fulfilled he has sent the full away empty, but those that seek find and those that knock it shall be opened, for we are to commanded to use all our heart, soul, MIGHT, body and MIND, in discovering the Lord's truths, but some are lazy and close minded. Do repost your thoughts if they are sincere... Woll.

Wollery's post is only a little way up this page. He's an astrophysicist, I'd really like to know what you have to say about his post.

 

[CapelDodger]

Hey, Dave, 'ol buddy, one of your kids has played a prank on you and switched your semi-colon ( and apostrophe (') keys. I'm sure if you would swap them back your posts would make a helluva lot more sense.

How sure ?

Yeah, I know, irony, just messin; with ya, bro;

 

[Paulhoff]

And it is now been proven that the speed of light is not an absolute, and so can be slowed down and even superceeded, for we shall travel at the speed of though not the slow speed of light.

Talk about a little knowledge being dangerous, "The speed of thought", the man is nuts.

Paul



The speed of light is constant in a vacuum.

 

[Foster Zygote]

At a forum full of atheists, do you really think anyone's going to take your word for this? Can you show us this proof?

As I mentioned to Edge earlier, Einstein used the word "God" as a metaphor for the laws governing the universe. He stated quite clearly however that he did not believe in any sort of supernatural intelligence that had consciously designed or intervened in the workings of the universe. For all intent and purpose Einstein was an atheist.

 

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Mutant pussy cat!

 

[Ladewig]

People here have patiently tried to explain that you are making many mistakes in your calculations. You have ignored their posts and insist that you are providing divinely inspired calculations.

Am I mistaken or does claiming that Einstein supported one's theories earn a few points on the Crakpot Index?

No, Einstein was actually a brilliant philospher and had quite the heart and soul for people, if you study his later life.

Actually, yes. The Crackpot Index

I think DJJ is easily on the high side of 70.

 

[Paulhoff]

I think DJJ is easily on the high side of 70.

That goes for the IQ too.

Paul



Well maybe the low side.

 

[Davidjayjordan]

As I mentioned to Edge earlier, Einstein used the word "God" as a metaphor for the laws governing the universe. He stated quite clearly however that he did not believe in any sort of supernatural intelligence that had consciously designed or intervened in the workings of the universe. For all intent and purpose Einstein was an atheist.

Nice try at a cop out and trying to reason away Einstein's reasoning. For reason and logic shows cause and effect, which is why Christian and Jewish scientists have such an advantage. They know laws exist if they can just find them and discover them. They look for reason whereas the masses hardly ever ask WHY. And the goyum sciience types hardly ever find anything, unless it is for funding and more research grants under false testing and assumptions.

SEE Famous Christian scientists

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/FamousChristianScientists.html

Sure the dam petrified controlling devoid church system always fights them, but the truth always eventually comes out... SEE Conspiracy Board

But NO< Einstein definitely found FAITH, and became a great philospher and humanitarian, even though as mentioned a little naive. He needed more experience in the real world sometimes rather than his idealized theoritical one, but his equations showed their had to be a parallel universe.

You should study his real life from some of the older books about Him, rather than assume he didn;t know the Lord. You are hardly an expert on His soul especially if you haven't ever read his words. Amazing man....

 

[Terry]

Why are you using the wrong number for the distance to the moon?

 

[Davidjayjordan]

Got to go athiests, actually I didn't know you were all atheists HERE, I figured it was an open minded discussion board.

But I guess even you,that believe in nothing and have nothing, have a right and a chance to hear about something or learn something before you go into your nothingness. Yet maybe I shall be back if there is even a glimmer of hope in that one of you breaks out of your bounds and actually starts thinking honestly, I may spend a little more time. Maybe just start a Golden Section as I don;t think even one of you knows its principles, I mean that you can NOT deny and negate. I take that back, you try follishly to negate everything into nothingness, as you aren't using your God given brains to figure out any mysteries. You are worse than a bunch of church people and more foolish than a bunch of adolescent teenagers. But while there is life there is hope, and I can't be accused of not trying.

But you have educated me how immature most of you are. I don't know if it is because you don't know rules or have common respect or if your atheism gave you these lack of principles. Whatever your choice in life and your responsibility.

Study a little tonight if you can or dare or have the courage... and if not, stay as dumb as you are and think you know it all, and have it all, even though you believe in nothing.

Sincerely david

 

[bruto]

try again Wollery, I must have missed seeing that post,...

DJJ: PAY ATTENTION! The post from Wollery to which the above quoted response is addresssed CONTAINED A LINK to the one you missed seeing. You missed it again. So just in case you missed Wollery's subsequent response that again contained the link, here it is again: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2326353&postcount=86

It's a polite and very specific response to a specific assertion of yours, exactly the thing that you stated at the beginning of this thread that you wanted.

I don't make a habit of quibbling over spelling and grammar in the hasty back-and-forth world of forum posting, but I'm having the same problem with this stuff that I have with "Light created Life" and his theories. You will undoubtedly think me a pedant for this, but here you are attempting to promote an idea that depends for its acceptance on convincing us that you have taken care, put in real work and critical thought. It seems that you've just out-thought the world, and come up with wisdom that has eluded the greatest minds in history, but you can't be bothered to check the math, get the basic science right, or even to run a spell checker on your writing. All we know of you is what we see here and on your web pages, and what we see there is carelessly done.

 

[Paul]

But NO< Einstein definitely found FAITH

“It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.”

 

[SimonD]

Bro, you can argue with Plato, and Pythagorus and the Egyptians masters and teachers, and all the ancients even though you and your low technology can;t do what they did eons ago, but do realise that I didn;t make up these values, but they knew them straight from Creation..

Your creation myth? or theirs? None of these people believed in your Christ God

I didn;t invent these numbers or manipulate numbers, these are just the BASIC SIMPLE values of sacred geometry that has been with us from the BEGINNING...

Not only did you create them, but you can't seem to use them correctly

So if you can't handle them, and don;t want to take the time to study and learn and get integrative but prefer disintegration and chaos, not my fault. I have been trying to teach you.

And do check out the new posting by Grunion, as you guys have to get up to light speed, and consider how matter can be created before you will ever catch these numbers.

You are the one that has to revisit your maths text books. Most kids can do maths correctly, which you cannot

 

[Davidjayjordan]

Why are you using the wrong number for the distance to the moon?

Terry I answered that previously, as the numbers are not mine, but the very basic foundation and cornerstone of sacred geometry. Actually to put it simply this knowledge came from spiritual entities, just like the mere Eghyptians had absolutely no way of knowing the diameter of the earth, and yet it is indented into the sides of the Great Pyramid. the ancients were taught by angels who knew the heavenly secrets which is why they were able to do sucvh astounding feats.

I'm just taking a few of them back for the Lord and His people. Simple straight forward. For any honest researcher can tell you what the ancients did are not reproduceable by modern man. Their wisdon covered the harmony of the earth. Moon and Sun, and it is for this reason that they could leviatate rocks etc... at certain frequencies etc....

So modern atheists mocking doesn't change the facts, that modern atheists can be blinded by their pride and limited by their pride.

The umber for the MOON was rounded off to 216, in this case 2160 miles,
and that perfcetly correlates with the SUN which is why an eclipse makes the Moons circle exactly the same size as the Sun's. I mean exact ratio is right there in an eclipse, but people don't want to understand WHY, this is so exact. For they love chance and chaos theory because it means they can stay superficial and foolish. Oh well. their problem their choice.

So again read a previous post or maybe its HERE...

http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/SquaredCircle.html

Good enough as you will see the Moons diamter there as well.... or at least half of it, because the phi pyrasmid is based on its radius to the center when it unites with the Earth.

got to fly. might catch you tommorrow if there is a glimmer of hope and honesty HERE. All the best

 

[Soapy Sam]

"Oh, look!", cried Tigger, "What a pretty windbag!"

"You mean an airship?" asked Pooh.

"No. An airship is a dirigible lighter-than-air craft. A windbag is an essentially useless gas-filled balloon. I know a windbag when I see one", said Tigger, chambering a tracer round in the GPMG.

 

[Davidjayjordan]

DJJ: PAY ATTENTION! The post from Wollery to which the above quoted response is addresssed CONTAINED A LINK to the one you missed seeing. You missed it again. So just in case you missed Wollery's subsequent response that again contained the link, here it is again: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2326353&postcount=86

It's a polite and very specific response to a specific assertion of yours, exactly the thing that you stated at the beginning of this thread that you wanted.

I don't make a habit of quibbling over spelling and grammar in the hasty back-and-forth world of forum posting, but I'm having the same problem with this stuff that I have with "Light created Life" and his theories. You will undoubtedly think me a pedant for this, but here you are attempting to promote an idea that depends for its acceptance on convincing us that you have taken care, put in real work and critical thought. It seems that you've just out-thought the world, and come up with wisdom that has eluded the greatest minds in history, but you can't be bothered to check the math, get the basic science right, or even to run a spell checker on your writing. All we know of you is what we see here and on your web pages, and what we see there is carelessly done.

Heart sometimes superceeds mind bruto, because the Lord has hidden truths from the so called wise and shown them to mere babes and the believeing. So Yes, maybe He has shown me these things cause I am in the process of taking them back for the Lord and His people. I have been a missionary all my life, so maybe he has connected up a few of the dots for me despite the fact that it should have been connected up by greater minds. Heck, I spent almost all my life on the mission field after university.

And I have a terrible memory as my wife can attest to, but I do figure out things because of a small still voice. You can mock if you like, not a problem, but shear brain power hardly ever works it takes openness and even inspiration and divine insight to solve some mysteries.

the Lord said seek and we shall find and he means just that. And he also says His secret things shall be revealed.

Ha, there be that verse. Surely the Lord God will do nothing except he revealeth his secrets unto his servants the prophets. Everyhting will be revealed so we might as understand them now before hand so we can act accordingly.

SEE http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/Prophecymysteries.html

But now I really got to go...

 

[Terry]

Terry I answered that previously, as the numbers are not mine, but the very basic foundation and cornerstone of sacred geometry. Actually to put it simply this knowledge came from spiritual entities

But they aren't consistent with objective reality. How does that work?

 

[SezMe]

How sure ?

Good question. I just measured my surety and it is 432 kilosquats per Sacred Furlong per Golden Shower Section.

 

[Loss Leader]

Their wisdon covered the harmony of the earth. Moon and Sun, and it is for this reason that they could leviatate rocks

I am dumbstruck. I have been struck by dumb.

The umber for the MOON was rounded off to 216, in this case 2160 miles, and that perfcetly correlates with the SUN which is why an eclipse makes the Moons circle exactly the same size as the Sun's. I mean exact ratio is right there in an eclipse, but people don't want to understand WHY, this is so exact.

You know the moon doesn't completely cover the sun during an eclipse, right? Just look up [wp]solar eclipse[/wp], it's all right there. They explain:

Conversely, an eclipse when the Moon is near its farthest distance from the Earth (i.e., near its apogee) can only be an annular eclipse because the Moon will appear to be slightly smaller than the Sun; the magnitude of an annular eclipse is less than 1. Slightly more solar eclipses are annular than total because, on average, the Moon lies too far from Earth to cover the Sun completely.

Also, you do know that the moon has been steadily moving away from the earth. Here's a fine source. The fact that the moon and the sun appear to be the same size is transitory. The moon will appear to shrink in relation to the sun if watched for long enough.

It's just all so ... stupid.

 

[wollery]

For reason and logic shows cause and effect, which is why Christian and Jewish scientists have such an advantage. They know laws exist if they can just find them and discover them. They look for reason whereas the masses hardly ever ask WHY. And the goyum sciience types hardly ever find anything, unless it is for funding and more research grants under false testing and assumptions.

Not just a strawman, but a giant piece of straw art!