My sentiments exactly, carchy....."farting in his general direction" is a jolly good idea, I must say!
....with no reason supplied as to why that would be a likely explanation.
I ask if you want my personal answers because your questions seem to be already addressed here and here. If you want my answers elaboration isn't necessary but seeking strictly 'yes' or 'no' answers would seem like you're more interested in maneuvering the answers to fit your arguments than an objective examination of the evidence. JMHO, but I'll see what I can do. BTW, you are a paralegal's assistant or a paralegal, right? I don't mean to be offensive but it rather shows in the way you engage the subject. Again, just an opinion.
Many of them, yes, madam council. (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
I can't say with certainty.
Yes. No, wait... is this a 'yes' or 'no' question? Are you really sure either of those two answers is necessary.
Based on the overwhelming evidence in support of dessication ridges and a total lack of reliable evidence supporting bigfoot, no.
Melissa, you seem to fundamentally misunderstand what skepticism is. That's OK, so did I when i first came here. Skepticism is based on the ability to be objective. At first glance it would seem you are genuinely attempting to be objective on the matter but I'm not sure if that's really what's going on.
Yes, actually....it does make the case for the Patterson film stronger.
on his way home from the filming. It's certainly possible. 
Oh yes, you must be long lost twins. Except you don't think along the same lines about bigfoot beyond believing they exist for some reason.
I don't remember saying something that amounted to 'she might be nuts' in giving a fourth option mentioning the possibilty of a manufactured memory. I do remember saying they could only be possibilities with out any evidence of the claimed event. I am starting to wonder about you, though. I'm sure you'll hop and fetch the quote, try not to muck it up.
I guess since we've seen time and again that substance equals semantic flailing for you as opposed to examining and seeking verification of reliable evidence claims it's not hard to understand that belief of yours.
When life hands you lemons or too many cups of weak coffee, why not have some asparagus? Sorry, Sweaty, but that's what your thinking regarding BH and Patty seems like to me.Yes, actually....it does make the case for the Patterson film stronger.
Because if BH was NOT the "guy-in-the-suit"....then who was?? In a thread on the BFF concerning "other possible candidates", there simply weren't any.
Over the years, nobody has ever come forward with a solid, believable story.
Now, reaching into the "Big Bag of Possibilities"....let's see what we get.....OH...it could be that the guy who wore the suit was runned over by a car
Maybe that explains why over 40 years nobody has ever come forward with a believable behind-the-scenes story of the film, and how he was the star of it.
Or...maybe it's because there was no guy-in-a-suit. That explanation suits me just fine.
Don't mince words. Not 'originally, maybe'. Originally, period. My jets are frosty, Lu. We're all (I'm pretty sure) adults here, so you can drop feigning offence. We've also seen plenty of your surmations on who's banned, who's suspended, and who's crossed the line or been reprimanded. It's pretty transparent. I never wanted a continued exchange with Lyndon/carcharodon privately, just not stinking up the thread further. Flame Wars is the place for that. If you are going to pretend not to be interested then not being one of the first people to check it out might have been a good idea. To his credit, even carcharodon lost interest in it. In reference to seeing that exchange I believe your words were something like 'I'd like to see that'. Shall I pull the quote?
You've convinced yourself, isn't that enough? You seem to not be content until until we all are convinced that BF does exist or at least that it's most likely. How come that we think it's not impossible while waiting for some reliable evidence to persuade us is not enough?I don't think I've convinced him there might be sasquatches (or something like them) in the eastern US yet.
You always say that nobody reads your links yet I wonder if you do. I guess if I dust off the old footer hat BF would be one of the recent migrants that have escaped detection?
