Blasphemy - still illegal in the US!

"Reading it on snopes"? You "read" snopes like a book? Page to page?

Do you have so much trouble discerning reality that snopes has to do it for you?

Is that, like, religious?

Interesting well poisoning. No, I happen to find many of snopes' articles amusing, and are part of the RSS feed to send me updates.



Then it would appear that if the professor was talking to God, then he believed God existed, and he should have expected a whuppin, cause "thems were fightin' words."



After the professor openly demanded that God had 15 minutes to knock him from the podium, and after 14 minutes of "cursing or contumeliously reproaching" God.

Yes. It is simple, isn't it?

Unless you can show me where the Marine was God, then your point is moot.



Oh, the "tough guy" thing was a "ribbing joke"?

That's why I asked.

Do you have an answer, or does the game continue?

This is only a game to you.
 
Okay, chickenman. Does the professor get prosecuted for "cursing or contumeliously reproaching" God? Or is it just that "tough guy" Marine who has to see the jury?

The rest of your post is insulting and a strawman. When you calm down, let me know I'd be happy to continue the conversation.

I'm quite calm, except for the guffaws and laughter.

Got caught, birdman? Lost track?

Can you keep on track here, or will the games continue?

Game's over. Answer the question:

Does the professor get prosecuted for "cursing or contumeliously reproaching" God? Or is it just that "tough guy" Marine who has to see the jury?

Display your superior moral position for all to see.
 
I'm quite calm, except for the guffaws and laughter.

Got caught, birdman? Lost track?



Game's over. Answer the question:



Display your superior moral position for all to see.

The professor, as previously pointed out, has various things to answer for. I am not condoning the fictitional actions attributed to him. However if he is tenured, there's not much recourse. So what? Physically assaulting someone for what they say is far different than simply saying it.

Still on with the insults? You really should find a better way to express yourself.
 
The professor, as previously pointed out, has various things to answer for.

"Various things to answer for."

Like the Marine?

In other words, you really like laws prohibiting assault (even if the person assaulted literally demands it), but the Massachusetts law prohibiting blasphemy must be simply "answered to", even by a tenured professor?

Why do I have difficulty understanding your position here?

Can you "find a better way to express yourself"?

I am not condoning the fictitional actions attributed to him. However if he is tenured, there's not much recourse.

Tenured professors are exempt from the law?

Why are Marines subject to the law?

So what? Physically assaulting someone for what they say is far different than simply saying it.

Yes. Physical attacks; bad.

Verbal attacks; good (except when it's the Huntster doing the "attacking". Then; bad).

Still on with the insults? You really should find a better way to express yourself.

Are they "insults" or "ribbing"?
 
"Various things to answer for."

Like the Marine?

In other words, you really like laws prohibiting assault (even if the person assaulted literally demands it), but the Massachusetts law prohibiting blasphemy must be simply "answered to", even by a tenured professor?

Why do I have difficulty understanding your position here?

Can you "find a better way to express yourself"?



Tenured professors are exempt from the law?

Why are Marines subject to the law?



Yes. Physical attacks; bad.

Verbal attacks; good (except when it's the Huntster doing the "attacking". Then; bad).



Are they "insults" or "ribbing"?



Ah more sophistry.

Are professors exempt from the law? Nice strawman, but I didn't claim that.

The rest is pretty much the same.
 
And more BS from you. What else should I expect?



That's why it was in question form. Again. And again.

Please try to answer the question.



As are your responses.


Do you have anything of substance to add?
 
Personally I think that the professor should get up and thank the marine for demonstrating quite beautifully that actions attributed to god are usually the actions of humans claiming to represent god.
 
Personally I think that the professor should get up and thank the marine for demonstrating quite beautifully that actions attributed to god are usually the actions of humans claiming to represent god.

Nicely done, sir.
 
Didn't have to. We've been laughing about that one for a while. And I certainly don't expect one from the likes of you.

Any time, or over any humor (which you probably wouldn't understand, anyway.......................obviously......................).

You can't see the problem with the marine acting on a request that was made to another entity?
I sure hope that there is a gay Marine around the next time you ask your wife for sexual favours, because, given your logic in supporting the "moral" of the "joke", you would have no problem with the marine filling in for your wife.
 
(Not perfect quote - but story from WWII almost certainly apocryphal:)

A German sub has been sunk by a British destroyer and the survivors rescued and aboard same. The Captain has reminded his men that they are to treat the prisoners with respect and must not belittle or assault them. Everything seems to be going well until the Captain steps off the bridge a couple of days after the sinking and sees a creman punching the sub Captain on the nose. The Captain of the destroyer runs up and (containing his rage carefully) asks what happened.
The crew man responds " Well sir, I was going about my business when this officer sneers at me and says "Your king is a sissy-boy!" I was angry that he had such cheek, but I remembered what you said and did nothing. Then he looked down his nose and said "Your ship stinks worse than a cesspool!" I was really angry then, but I remembered what you said and held off. But then,sir, he turned to the rail and he spat into OUR ocean................."
 
I'm sure it's one of those obscure laws that the government doesn't bother with enforcing... that is, until election time when some politician or prosecutor wants to look "moral" for the mob.

Or until you get exactly the wrong person elected to office.
 
Not in my opinion. Tomorrow, I'll ask a couple of Marines what they think of it. My bet is that they'll laugh their asses off.



Yup.

What does that have to do with knocking the hell out of somebody who asks for it?



Yup.

The professor asked to get his ass knocked off the podium, then it happened.

Hey; God works in strange and wondrous ways.............

My wife's grandfather was a U.S. Marine. He was very highly regarded in his local VFW not only because he'd fought on Iwo Jima where most of his unit was wiped out and spent over a year in the hospital after that with two shattered legs, but also because he was a fair, level headed and very nice guy. After he died one of his vet friends told us a story about a night at the VFW hall. One of the younger members was spouting off about some group he disagreed with and suggested that if he encountered one of these people he'd beat his ass. My wife's grandfather told him that that would make him little different from the fascists that his fellow Americans had fought in the war.
 
Last edited:
Is it?

Did someone here in the United States ask God to fly a couple of hijacked airplanes into the World Trade Center?

Explain your clarity, please..............

Your hypothetical Marine heard God's voice in his head and punished the infidel. The terrorists of Sept. 11 heard God's voice in their heads and punished the infidels.
 
Yup.

The professor asked to get his ass knocked off the podium, then it happened.

Hey; God works in strange and wondrous ways.............

Are you saying that Klan abuse of civil rights advocates was justified?
 
If they're tenured there's not a whole lot to do about it,

About professional misconduct rising to the level of incompetence?

I wish I knew where you had tenure, where "incompetence" was not grounds for removal....
 
Or until you get exactly the wrong person elected to office.

Actually, it's one of those laws that you want around for those cases.

It's so obviously unconstitutional that you can probably get the person removed from office for abuse of process and malicious prosecution if he tries using it. Think of it like a bright shiny button labelled "If you press this, you will lose your job."
 

Back
Top Bottom