Jesus Freak:
I've added some comments and questions in brackets to the text from your link below. Done off the top of my head, don't assume that just because I didn't comment on something that I agree with it. I edited some out to comply with copyright (it was already an excerpt to start with). When you get a chance:
Instructor: ... One evidence of this is the fact that early man lived in caves. [no one cites this as evidence of evolution]
Student: But prof, ...houses.
Instructor: Another evidence is the fact that man is no longer evolving. This supports our theory that he stopped evolving about 100,000 years ago. [Wrong. Evolution says man is still evolving]
Student: But prof, ...he ever did earlier?
Instructor: There are ...ape-like ancestor.
Student: But prof, our DNA is totally different than an ape's.[No, it's 97% the same] The number ... much larger.
Instructor: Our brain capacity... increased in size.
Student: But prof, what about the Neanderthals? They are supposed to be the ones we most recently evolved from—and they had larger braincases than we have![evolution is a "random walK". It has no direction and merely adapts to what is needed now. No evolutions claims ANY of our features evolved directly.]
Instructor: ... But we know they must have looked like apes [no they looked a lot like us], because they only used primitive tools and weapons.
Student: But prof, people have been found in places such as New Guinea, where they use stone implements—yet they are fully human.[no evolutionist claims that tool use isn't learned] ...Instructor: We also know that ancient people looked like apes because they slouched as they walked. They also had lots of hair on their bodies. All this can be seen in modern paintings of early man.[Noone cites the paintings as evidence, it's the other way around the paintings are based on the evidence]
Student: But prof, artists cannot tell us what ancient man looked like.[no, but paleontlogists can] Bone fragments cannot reveal how much hair was on the body. In addition, we know that our backbones are designed for upright walking. The spines of the apes cause them to hump over and "knuckle walk."
Instructor: Er, uh; back to the Neanderthals. They were a primitive people, because they show evidence of it in their bones.
Student: But prof, even Darwin's defender, Thomas Huxley, said the Neanderthals were humans[Yeah, they are. Everything in the genus Homo is human. But there are different species in the genus Homo] and did not prove evolution[But we have DNA samples today. Huxley would change his mind, assuming this attribution is true. Though it is still debatable whether they are a separate species or a subspecies]. Rudolph Virchow, a leading German anatomist, said their bones were slightly deformed from rickets and arthritis.[and he's been refuted] As for the heavy brow ridges, there are peoples living today who have them.[and that would be why I said earlier they looked a lot like us] What about that Neanderthal found in a medieval suit of chain armor, not fully rusted? [Huh????]
Instructor: Well, we also have the Cro-Magnons. These may be the missing link.[No evolutionist says this. Cro-Magnon is the earliest example of our species. And no evolutionists refers to the missing link anymore. Lots of links have been found since that phrase was invented over a century ago]
Student: But prof, why is it that, each time, only one specimen is found? Why are only little pieces of bone found for each specimen—never a complete skeleton? Careful anatomists declare that, using a few pieces, one can attempt to prove almost anything. Why is it those bones never decayed, though they are supposed to be over a million years old? Such bones are said to have been found in England, Indonesia, and China. Yet all other bones there rot away in a few years. Actually, if bones could last millions of years—then the world would be covered with bones! But that does not happen, because bones rot away. [LOL. Not all bones are going to last the same amount of time. Depends on what they are buried in]
Instructor: We know that these finds must be so, since they were always found by men of the highest integrity, whose word we should accept.[No, the bones are examined by multiple people.] They point to those bones, and declare them to be millions of years old [No, the date them using a variety of mechanisms]
Student: But prof, repeatedly finds of old bones have turned out to be fakes: Java Man, Piltdown Man, Rhodesian Man, Taung African Man, Nebraska Man, Peking Man, and on and on. For example, Nebraska Man, which was the great discovery hailed at the 1925 Scopes trial in Dayton, Tennessee—turned out, a year later, to be nothing more than a pig's tooth. [Many of these weren't even accepted by scientists in the first place and were exposed by scientists. Care to talk about Christian relics?]
Instructor: We could also discuss Piltdown Man, but we had best avoid that topic. Let us now turn our attention to the drawings of ancient man. They show evolution at work. [No one claims this!]
Student: But prof, lots of people today do not draw any better! On the other hand, have you ever found an ape who could draw anything even slightly as well?
Instructor: Another fact, showing the great antiquity of these bones, is that some of them were found several feet under the ground. It must have taken millions of years of erosion and plant decay to bury them there. [This is a complete misrepresentation of how dating is done]
Student: But prof, perhaps other people buried the human bones. As for the ape bones, they have totally different DNA.[No they don't] Such radical changes in DNA just never occur.
Instructor: Just by looking at those bones[wrong again], experts estimate their age at millions of years old.
Student: But prof, why do those experts refuse to let the bones be examined by mass spectrometer technique?[They do] Whenever that has been done, the bones have been shown to be 5,000 years or less in age. [I'd like to see some proof of this]
Instructor: Student, you suggest irrelevant details meant to confuse the ignorant. I have seen some of those bones for myself, and I believe the words of the experts. As for complete skeletons of ancient people, they are just never found.
Student: But prof, Guadeloupe Woman was found in 1812 on a Caribbean island, and is now in the British Museum. It is a fully complete human skeleton, except for the head and feet—and was found in very old, hardened limestone, more than a mile in length! Geologists place its age at 28 million years, yet the skeleton was fully human.[Evidence please?]
Instructor: That is just one example.
Student: More examples could be cited. There is the Calaveras skull, belonging to a modern-type man, yet fully mineralized in 2 million-year-old Pliocene stratum. Dozens of stone implements were found by it. Other examples would be the Castinedolo Skull in Italy, the Moab Skeletons in eastern Utah, and the human footprints in—
Instructor: That is foolishness! I have heard about all those so- called human footprints! [Evidence of any of these please?]
Student: But prof, not only have many oversize footprints been found in various parts of the world, sometimes with dinosaur tracks—but leading paleontologists agree that many of them are genuine. One example would be the Laetoli tracks, which extend 90 feet, and were found by none other than Mary Leakey, in eastern Africa, in 1976-1978.[Never heard of Laeotli including dinosaurs! Evidence please?]
Instructor: The very idea that large human footprints were found adjacent to dinosaur tracks—just does not fit evolutionary theory.
Student: But prof, perhaps the theory is wrong. Large human footprints have been found even on top of dinosaur tracks! [Evidence please?]
Instructor: If that were true, that would mean that humans were alive when the dinosaurs lived!
Student: That would not be difficult, if dinosaurs only went extinct within the past few thousand years. Keep in mind the Antelope Springs tracks. In 1968, William Meister found sandaled human footprints with trilobites! That find would mean humans were alive as far back as life extends—in the Cambrian strata. That is the oldest fossil-bearing strata on the planet. So even the Cambrian is not very old.
Instructor: Evolutionary theory teaches that slow, gradual changes occurred over millions of years, and only produced the most necessary changes.
Student: But prof, what about the vast intelligence of man? Alfred Russel Wallace, Darwin's close friend, declared that human intelligence was too great to have evolved! Then there are the languages of man. They are extremely complicated; yet, as far back as we go, they only become more complicated! [Huh? How do you figure that?]
Instructor: Paleontologists tell us that man originated in Africa.
Student: But prof, research of all kinds reveals that the first men were in the Near East. This is shown by agriculture, mining, tool making, domesticated animals. As far back as we go, man was as intelligent as he is today. [Uh no. Go back 2.5 million years]
