LC:FC in PREproduction for over 1 year?!

~enigma~

Banned
E
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
7,923
Posted by do over at LCF...

theaters.jpg


theaters_b.jpg
 
Hey, it takes a long time to fix all those errors and replace them with new ones. Give him some slack.
 
more irony...see the film just to the bottom and left....lol...its "United93"

TAM
 
haha... you know...Battle Angel Alita showed up in the hollywood reporter as well....and guess how far into production that movie is (put it this way, it was announced in 1993....its only got a "release date" recently of 2009 - and even then, they still dont even have a cast or even a special fx house to do the intended sfx.)

and why blur all of that? anyone can get access to HR. its a public publication.
 
From my experience, a film which have been standing still for a year or more is not likely to get any kind of financial backing. It is seen as a bad investment and will be canned to cut the loss. SOP.
 
I understand Dylan has no respect for the victims of 9/11 or even for most of us here except padawan Roberts but why doesn't he at least respect his followers. Does he really expect everybody in LCF to just think he is god over a preproduction that already lasted 1 year? The man is most certainly in need of a competent psychiatrist.
 
Agreed there. I'm wondering if these conference calls of Avery and Co. are merely begging for finances or actual negotiations? Avery has lost pretty much all backbone and is simply lying to cover up more lies...
 
Oh, man, that really is an albatross around their necks. They've got proof positive that they can't get a DOCUMENTARY off the ground in a year, even with the announced support of Charlie Sheen - a DOCUMENTARY!

I hear Jack in the Box is hiring.
 
appearing in any hollywood rag that tells of any films in production means jack squat. Posting that image doesn't prove anything. All its proven is that they've been sitting on something for more than a year. and are now a risky investment.
 
Arus808 said:
[snip] Posting that image doesn't prove anything. All its proven is that they've been sitting on something for more than a year. and are now a risky investment.
Click to expand...

Exactly. I used to work at a place where they financed the technical production of small independent stuff, both fiction and documentary, either as part or full financial backing of the tech stuff. Sometimes even manpower.
If a project had not moved for a year, it was considered a lost cause and subsequently thrown out.
It would also mean that the next time the same person came with a production application, the botched production were taken into consideration and became a serious part of the entire approval process. IF, and that's a mighty big IF, the new production were approved, the persons backing it were kept on an extremely tight leash by a, and I quote, "Rude, obnoxious, meddling ****/ bitch of a technical producer" whom kept a sharp eye on schedules while breathing down the applicants neck to keep work moving.

The unholy trinity's project wouldn't have stood a chance. The fact that they don't care one iota about other peoples copyright and are doing a piss-poor journalistic job would have them cut off so fast their heads would be spinning.
 
Yes...totally ^_^

100's of productions are listed in HR...on a weekly basis....and the percentage of those making it to the theaters are at most 10% .

Really, Dylan and company shouldn't be "happy" about being listed (and blurring out whatever information is like trying to hide the Hollywood sign with a big tree), that shows they've been working on something for that long...Its should be a badge of embarrassment.
 
Has anyone else seen "An evening with Kevin Smith"?

I'm thinking of his "Superman" story, while reading Avery's little publicity blurb here. Is that wrong of me?
 
Arrowhead from LC is way too funny:

200701211917088fz.png



haha, please those lc guys really dont understand what it takes to get a movie into theaters.
 
Arus808 said:
Yes...totally ^_^

100's of productions are listed in HR...on a weekly basis....and the percentage of those making it to the theaters are at most 10% .

Really, Dylan and company shouldn't be "happy" about being listed (and blurring out whatever information is like trying to hide the Hollywood sign with a big tree), that shows they've been working on something for that long...Its should be a badge of embarrassment.
Click to expand...

You know, I can't help but noticing that part of the blurred out info, is the "Executive Producer" stuff which would normally show whom are backing it financially (in the shape of a person and a compagny referenece). Could it be that Avery is trying to hide one of the following:

1: They DID get cut off from a production company (Which is a bad thing since it would get the project on the black list with other companies, grape wine tactics and all) and are now trying to hide it to prevent people from contacting the executive producer in question and get the truth.

2: They are hiding the fact that they attempt to finance it themselves and are utterly failing

3: They DON'T have ANY kind of financial backing...
 
Arus808 said:
Arrowhead from LC is way too funny:

[qimg]http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/6734/200701211917088fz.png[/qimg]


haha, please those lc guys really dont understand what it takes to get a movie into theaters.
Click to expand...

They wouldn't know even if it stood up and smacked them in the head with a 2x4 inscribed with "THIS IS HOW YOU DO IT, MORON!"......
 
Well the simple solution to finding that out is if anyone has a year or so's copies of Hollywood Reporter just laying around. Surely someone out of this board or the internet at large subscribes and doesn't toss it.
 
The_Fire said:
You know, I can't help but noticing that part of the blurred out info, is the "Executive Producer" stuff which would normally show whom are backing it financially (in the shape of a person and a compagny referenece). Could it be that Avery is trying to hide one of the following:

1: They DID get cut off from a production company (Which is a bad thing since it would get the project on the black list with other companies, grape wine tactics and all) and are now trying to hide it to prevent people from contacting the executive producer in question and get the truth.

2: They are hiding the fact that they attempt to finance it themselves and are utterly failing

3: They DON'T have ANY kind of financial backing...
Click to expand...
Dodohead claims it is his EP's personal information. Then he goes on to say this os all we need to know...trust him. Yeah...how far can I throw him?
 
Hah! Great... So, we have proof that it's in production. I really don't think anyone was seriously questioning that aspect of this nonsense.

But, check it out... Dylan's playing this off as if it's confirmation of a theater release.

I think it's time I sign up over there and get myself banned...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom