Sean Manchester - Vampire Hunter

Sean Manchester has been maliciously harassed by someone called Alex Lucard and the evidence is there for all to see. Where is the evidence (apart from someone who is waging a vendetta alleging it to be so) that Sean Manchester has ever harassed Alex Lucard?

Maliciously harassed?
Manchester started stalking his blog because of Lucards name, Lucard never sought out the barmy bishop. Lucard then posted some information about this paranoid, stake happy self proclaimed vampire expert which was not to the liking of the litigious Manchester (who's first recourse to any criticisms is to make pseudo legal threats which only show how little he understands of both the law and reality, a trait which you seem to share with him), who maid a complaint to the blog hosting company. This is all well documented, you protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.
 
If you knew where my field of expertise lay you would better understand why my apparent grasp of the detail seems incredible. But that is privileged information.

Oh, come on, that's the oldest piece of guff in the book.... :lol
 
David Farrant has hunted vampires and, when that failed to gain him the attention he craved, attempted to raise them in occult ceremonies involving naked females splattered with blood cavorting over graves in Highgate Cemetery. Is that distasteful enough for you?

Sean Manchester has been maliciously harassed by someone called Alex Lucard and the evidence is there for all to see. Where is the evidence (apart from someone who is waging a vendetta alleging it to be so) that Sean Manchester has ever harassed Alex Lucard?

Tell us who is waging a vendetta?

The Alex Lucard saga is up on the internet for all to see. You can't talk your way out of that.

What about the family in Virginia? They never posted a word about Manchester, yet he hijacked their family blog, played sock puppets to cause trouble, then threatened the family with a lawsuit. After chasing them from ISP to ISP, the good Bishop got a warning from the family's new ISP. How do you explain all that?
 
Evidence is required - not spurious allegations

Manchester started stalking his blog because of Lucards name, Lucard never sought out the barmy bishop. Lucard then posted some information about this paranoid, stake happy self proclaimed vampire expert... etc etc

This is what Lucard claims. Well, he would wouldn't he?

There has, in fact, been no posting by Sean Manchester on any of Lucard's sites despite the latter's protestations to the contrary. Nobody from the Manchester camp, least of all Manchester himself, has ever had an issue with Lucard's name or its spelling. I, too, have seen these allegations made by Lucard and others. They are spurious and without any evidence to support them.
 
More malicious falsehood

What about the family in Virginia? They never posted a word about Manchester, yet he hijacked their family blog, played sock puppets to cause trouble, then threatened the family with a lawsuit. After chasing them from ISP to ISP, the good Bishop got a warning from the family's new ISP. How do you explain all that?

What new piece of rubbish is this? I am reasonably confident that Sean Manchester has received no warning and has chased nobody's ISP. How many times do we have to read these false allegations? I could level the same accusations about you. I could say absolutely anything if I was of a mind, but that's the difference between me and you. I am not in the business of spreading malicious falsehood.

So where is the so-called "warning" that was issued? Your word will not suffice. Provide some proof for once.
 
Does manchester ever post anywhere himself? All I've seen around is people posting on his behalf. Or at least, people claiming to... ;)
 
Talk about wriggling off the hook!!!! As can be clearly seen Manchester never answers anything about himself,(other than to say he is Mr Wonderful) just throws up a counter accusation about someone else--usually David F . If you defend your own good names against what he says, then you are "waging a vitriolic hate campaign" against him!He refers to me as Catherine in a derogatory sexist way as "females" as if we are soem sort of inferior species.

I pity his wife who he " saved from the clutches of Satanists"--poor woman, I think I'd have stuck with the Satanists--and wrote a sordid book all about it with pictures of her cavorting topless in it!

Also dont forget his naked cavortings in London Cemetary when he went to "Luisa's" grave who had been bitten by the Highgate Vampire and died,according to his Gospel truth haha worst selling book, he stood in the nuddy apart from a skimpy purples cloak all night--good job there were no dog walkers around---then she rose up out of the grave and turned into a Giant spider which he stabbed with his stake and she turned into horrid nasty hissing sizzling goo, while he threw himself onto her sobbing uncontrollaby.

Wonder what her family thought of all that!

Oh and did you hear about his naughty Diana dreams!!


Either he is higher than mortal man or he's talking a load of old codswallop--I know what I think
barbara
 
What new piece of rubbish is this? I am reasonably confident that Sean Manchester has received no warning and has chased nobody's ISP.

How would you know? You say that you are not at all connected to him, and yet you apparently think you should know every little detail of his life. My olfactory bulb detects the scent of Rattus Rattus.
 
This is what Lucard claims. Well, he would wouldn't he?

There has, in fact, been no posting by Sean Manchester on any of Lucard's sites despite the latter's protestations to the contrary. Nobody from the Manchester camp, least of all Manchester himself, has ever had an issue with Lucard's name or its spelling. I, too, have seen these allegations made by Lucard and others. They are spurious and without any evidence to support them.
What nefarious reason would Lucard have for defaming Manchester (unless he is actually Dracula?).
Given that Manchester is prone to unsubstantiated, paranoid, flights of fantasy regarding Vampires, it is not unreasonable to believe that he has harassed Lucard, and possibly for something as silly as his name- in much the same way as he (or those who purport to follow Bishop Buffy) have been harassing "the Vampire" on her blog.
And lest face it, The Right Reprehensible Manchester even contacted the JREF to demand that all discussion of him and his wacky beliefs and activities must cease.
This is clearly a man who fails to understand both the laws of reality and the laws of the United Sates, and the United Kingdom.

Oh, BTW I'm still waiting for your advice on, and analysis of, the Religious Hatred act which you claimed that posts here where in breach of. It should make fascinating reading.
Whatever your professed (privileged! Oh my…) area of expertise is, it clearly isn't law.
 
Purely co-incidence that this quote from
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2256272&postcount=26
:
The magistrate was obliged to acquit Farrant of that charge because it was apparent to all present, not least defending solictor Mr Jeffrey Bayes, that Highgate Cemetery by any stretch of the imagination cannot be described as "an enclosed area." This technicality secured Farrant's release in 1970. However, we should also remind ourselves of what the magistrate, Mr J D Purcell, said when Farrant first appeared before him: "You should be seen by a doctor."

is identical to this quote from the enormously long Wikipedia discussion page on the "Highgate Vampire"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:H...le_according_to_User:Vampire_Research_Society
The magistrate was obliged to acquit Farrant of that charge because it was apparent to all present, not least defending solictor Mr Jeffrey Bayes, that Highgate Cemetery by any stretch of the imagination cannot be described as "an enclosed area." This technicality secured Farrant's release in 1970. However, we should also remind ourselves of what the magistrate, Mr J D Purcell, said when Farrant first appeared before him: "You should be seen by a doctor."

Signed by user: Vampire Research Society.

Go to the Vampire Research Society website
http://www.holygrail-church.fsnet.co.uk/Vampire Research Society.htm

to find that the President and founder of the "Vampire Research Society " is none other than Manchester himself.
Pure coincidence of course....

Normal practice is to provide a link or reference to a direct quotation unless of course these are obviously well worn arguments repeated from a less than impartial source.

The site is a an "enlightening" and hilarious read - but I had to turn off the Hammer Horror soundtrack though. Nothing like serious Vampirological (sic) Research is there? Not like those interfering "amateur vampire hunters" despised on the site with "very little knowledge about how to deal with the suspected undead if they encountered it."
http://www.gothicpress.freeserve.co.uk/Amateur Vampire Hunters.htm

-

-

-
 
Hi Lothian, well the story about the late Princess Di was that at the exact moment of her death she appeared to our man(!) in a skimpy nightie gliding across a lake with a brimming chalice in her hands. Rather Freudian hey what.
tO CONTINUE.....

he awakened sobbing uncontrollably and switched on his wireless to hear the dreadful tidings that at that exact moment of hsi vision the princess had been killed in a car crash.

With all due respect to the late princess and forgive me for being a bit of a doubting thomas, but why on earth should the princess appear to an obscure vampire hunting bishop who she did not know at the exact moment of her death? Surely if she went anywhere it would have been to her sons?

To make matters worse, if that be at all possible, the heartbroken manchester( who previously had called the princess a floozie and a jezebel) went onto compose a "musical tribute" which was the most god-awful racket you ever heard.

We all thought he intended to turn her into a vampire but obvioulsy had second thoughts, and reported no further heavenly visions of nightie-clad royalty when the queen mum and princess margaret passed to the big palace in the sky.

barbara
 
I was investigating the situation long before the thread on this forum and have had email and snail mail communication with various people from both sides, but not the main protagonists.

If you knew where my field of expertise lay you would better understand why my apparent grasp of the detail seems incredible. But that is privileged information.

Again let me clarify this so I don't make any false assumptions:

Is it

1) The only connection you have had with Sean Manchester is via emails since the subject was raised on this Forum?
2) You were in contact with Sean Manchester via emails prior to him coming up on this Forum and your joining and posting here?
3) You have never had any contact with Sean Manchester.

Can you just also confirm that you do not know Sean Manchester personally? For example he is not a friend, a business colleague, your employer, partner or something similar?
 
David Farrant

I have since spoken to David Farrant via telephone and he has asked me to convey the following:

As my name apparently is being bandied arbout here all over the place by one calling himself 'MythBuster', I thought I should set the record straight. To begin with, and as most people will be aware (and this is particularly for yourself Darat) this person is not genuine but an old acquaintance of mine dating back some 40yrs or so (this can easily be checked by reference to his IP number).

Just to set the record straight Mr. Manchester has advertised widely on the net that his 'retreat centre' on the South Coast is for the purposes of rehabilitation victims of Satanic Cults. He has further implicated in such public posting that these people have been 'saved' by his 'church'. Quite honestly, I do not believe one word of this but he has stated this repeatedly on the internet and such statements are therefore in the public domain and thereby subject to public questioning.

As to the matter of Mr. Manchester being a bona-fide bishop, he has again stated publically on the internet that his credentials are 'impeccable' and that these are accepted by the Official Old Catholic Church in Holland, the Official Old Catholic Church in USA and the Official Old Catholic Church in the United Kingdom and that he is recognised by the Vatican.

All sheer and utter baloney! In fact, the heiarachy of the Old Catholic Church in Holland totally deny that his ordination (so-called) was valid. The Old Catholic Church in the USA say exactly the same thing and The Old Catholic Church in the UK (which really exists) have just withdran an Ad Clerum suppporting Mr. Manchester which they were only forced to issue temporarily in the first place due to Mr. Manchester threatening them adverse publicity and legal action. Finally the Vatican have stated that they have never even heard of Mr. Manchester or his alleged 'church' all the above facts I have had personally verified in writing.

David Farrant President of The British Psychic and Occult Society/The Highgate Vampire Society

PP Catherine Fearnley, Secretary of The British Psychic and Occult Society/The Highgate Vampire Society

NB:Please note this is fully signed in my real name.
 
Hi Lothian, .......

barbara
Barbara, Interesting. If Manchester turns up we can perhaps see if he has had any more paranormal visions as the paranormal is what we are interested in here. This brings me to a claim of yours. I understand from your Robin Hood website that
During the Kirklees Vampire investigation, Otley artist and psychic invetigator Evelyn Friend tried to exorcise the evil vibrations in the area by blessing the ley lines which originated at the grave-site. These ancient lines of mystical power were discovered by the Yorkshire Robin Hood Society in 1986 they stretch from the grave to Hartshead Church, The Three Nuns Inn, Castle Hill at Huddersfield and Alegar Holy Well in Brighouse.
I understand that you and Catherine are effectively the Yorkshire Robin Hood Society. How did you discover the Ley lines ? Who has confirmed that they are there?
 

Back
Top Bottom