• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christophera said:
Why did LC forums ban me for posting evidence and logic supporting the concrete core?
Click to expand...

Because there is no concrete core and they were tired of you posting junk?

There is no concrete core?

You show pictures of no concrete core!

You show pictures of just a steel core!

You take news errors and use them as proof of a concrete core!

You refuse to listen to proof of no concrete core.

You will not even look at your own pictures of the steel core and understand you debunk yourself.

LC is loony anyway and they were hoping you would post here so they can laugh at you from a distance.

You have no evidence for a concrete core.

You present evidence for a steel core and then you say it is concrete; that is lack of logic!

You ignored the darn email I presented to you from an expert telling us there is no concrete core. I am upset and if I was mean I would ban you for not trying to read and comprehend others work; you treat others work with indifference and by doing so you dishonor others.

You seem to miss the fact you keep giving this forum crap but they let you present your fact less conclusions; where LC is not out for truth but the ban you? This is illogical since LC has no facts they should enjoy your insane concrete core dribble; but Dylan is trying to make money and he knows LC is a fraud, he knows you are a liar.

Dylan knows you are a liar cause Dylan makes money telling lies on his DVDs. He has to keep out the idiots who make it too easy to see the simple concrete core lies, may expose his total lack of physical evidence.

Have you ever wondered why this forum lets you rant of concrete core?

Because toleration is the logical way to learn; we must tolerate ignorance or we become like the ones we do not want to be.
 
Last edited:
For instance, why won't the scholars for 9-11 truth allow me to join? Why don't they embrace the concrete core which CAN be fractured by a small amount of explosive to fall instantly while steel cannot?

Why did LC forums ban me for posting evidence and logic supporting the concrete core?
Click to expand...

Fact is that no one, no one at all on either side of the 9/11 debate accepts your contentions. Neither 'Truth Movement' or the so-called 'official theorists'.

Face it you are alone, utterly alone in your theory so either the rest of the world is wrong or you are.
 
jaydeehess said:
Fact is that no one, no one at all on either side of the 9/11 debate accepts your contentions. Neither 'Truth Movement' or the so-called 'official theorists'.
Click to expand...

That is only because of successful gatekeeping.

jaydeehess said:
Face it you are alone, utterly alone in your theory so either the rest of the world is wrong or you are.
Click to expand...

With one post you are proven wrong.

Leslie Robertson, Architect Of The World Trade Center Towers

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

Says engineer Robertson, “If they had fallen down immediately, the death counts would have been unimaginable,” he says. “The World Trade Center has performed admirably, and everyone involved in the project should be proud.” The buildings were designed specifically to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, the largest plane flying in 1966, the year they broke ground on the project.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3069641/

Then there is August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE.
 
Christophera said:
That is only because of successful gatekeeping.



With one post you are proven wrong.

Leslie Robertson, Architect Of The World Trade Center Towers

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

Says engineer Robertson, “If they had fallen down immediately, the death counts would have been unimaginable,” he says. “The World Trade Center has performed admirably, and everyone involved in the project should be proud.” The buildings were designed specifically to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, the largest plane flying in 1966, the year they broke ground on the project.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3069641/

Then there is August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE.
Click to expand...

You use the news of this post, which is wrong, to base your junk.

You are wrong, the article is wrong. Write to them and ask them why they messed up. Because I have done this for you and you ignored me. You do it.

You are wrong and you refuse to see that the news is wrong sometimes. You are wrong.
 
Chris you have a thread here thats over 10500 posts long and you yourself have over 2500 posts.. now WHO are the "'gatekeepers"? JREF? or loose change?
 
beachnut said:
You use the news of this post, which is wrong, to base your junk.

You are wrong, the article is wrong. Write to them and ask them why they messed up. Because I have done this for you and you ignored me. You do it.

You are wrong and you refuse to see that the news is wrong sometimes. You are wrong.
Click to expand...

Oops, ...... you forgot to get credible.

REQUIREMENTS OF CREDIBILITY:We know there was a core, if one core didn't exist, then the other did.

For anybody posting who presents a purpose or reason for saying "no concrete", in order for them to be credible, the post must also explain HOW the supposed 47 steel core columns were cut to create near free fall which ALSO explains why they are NEVER seen in images of the demolition.
 
Christophera said:
That is only because of successful gatekeeping.



With one post you are proven wrong.

Leslie Robertson, Architect Of The World Trade Center Towers

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.

Says engineer Robertson, “If they had fallen down immediately, the death counts would have been unimaginable,” he says. “The World Trade Center has performed admirably, and everyone involved in the project should be proud.” The buildings were designed specifically to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, the largest plane flying in 1966, the year they broke ground on the project.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3069641/

Then there is August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE.
Click to expand...

I already sent a email to the guy who wrote the August Domel paper, and you refused to understand they made a mistake too.

So you can rot in your ignorance! I have worked to help you understand the truth and you ignore my work. Fine, your ignorance is tolerated because you do not break the rules.

You call me a kid. I do not care if you do so; you are the one who takes my work and dumps on me. You fail to understand simple things. I wrote to the author of August Domel's paper; you called me a liar. You never will be about to research anything if you can not see what I did was real.

You are poor at research and you will fail to learn more about 9/11 until you learn to research. I gave you my best and you crap on me.

So call me a kid now, but it seems my humble research abilities dwarf your abilities by an order of magnitude. My BSEE/MSEE/ATP and countless extra training are dwarfed by you ability to be insane. Sorry I let you down by making sure my demeanor would not help you to see the efforts of my humble work.

May you spend the rest of your paranoid life in ignorance, since you fail to use anyone's inputs to help you.
 
Last edited:
A W Smith said:
Chris you have a thread here thats over 10500 posts long and you yourself have over 2500 posts.. now WHO are the "'gatekeepers"? JREF? or loose change?
Click to expand...

Interesting question.

It appears that Loose Change is more of a gatekeeper than JREF. In fact I've learned that JREF is actually a very functional forum where moderators will enforce the rule, unlike LC forum and other 9-11 expose forums where opinions rather than facts seem to rule.

Have you seen my page on LC forum?

http://algoxy.com/psych/whatis9-11_loose-change.html
 
Christophera said:
With one post you are proven wrong.

Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.


http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3069641/
Click to expand...

Robertson never said concrete core; the reporter for MSNBC is wrong as are you Chris.

But MSNBC will tell you they are wrong; Chris will never admit he can learn anything new.
 
beachnut said:
I already sent a email to the guy who wrote the August Domel paper, and you refused to understand they made a mistake too.
Click to expand...

Yes, and I discovered that guy is the same guy that developed the "hammer theory". Nuff said.

As far as I know August Domel wrote the August Domel paper and we haven't heard from him.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
Robertson never said concrete core; the reporter for MSNBC is wrong as are you Chris.

But MSNBC will tell you they are wrong; Chris will never admit he can learn anything new.
Click to expand...

REQUIREMENTS OF CREDIBILITY:We know there was a core, if one core didn't exist, then the other did.

For anybody posting who presents a purpose or reason for saying "no concrete", in order for them to be credible, the post must also explain HOW the supposed 47 steel core columns were cut to create near free fall which ALSO explains why they are NEVER seen in images of the demolition.

 
I'd like to remind everyone here that engaging Christophera in this is cruel, and only prolongs the time until he can get help. Please just say no, for his sake.
 
CA, you are not having any problems getting your story out there. Your problem is in convincing anyone at all that you are correct. You cannot show any evidence of any of your claims, no photos showing the concrete core being poured for eg., and certainly no evidence whatsoever of explosive covered rebar in any buildings at all much less that towers. All you have are mistakes by journalists, half remembered docuementaries and your own diagrams.

Again, either you are wrong or the rest of the world is. Why should anyone believe you?
 
Christophera said:
Yes, and I discoverd that guy is the same guy that developed the "hammer theory". Nuff said.

As far as I know August Domel wrote the August Domel paper and we haven't heard from him.
Click to expand...

You now prove you lack the ability to research. I sent an email and you even remember who wrote the paper for Domel. Now you twist it and ignore real experts for your own ideas.

You have only yourself to back up you ideas and some mistakes made by people who admit they were making errors.

Nuff said; you are the only one in the world who thinks there was a concrete core in the WTC towers in the upper floors.

You are unique and the only one in the CT world and non CT world who has the concrete core idea. Your own web pages prove you wrong.

Nuff said
 
from your loose change page Chris

How many explosions would be required to cut 47 1300 foot columns and cut them into 40 foot pieces?

How much high explosive is required to cut thick tempered steel without linear shape charges?

Does the explosive have to be in direct contact with the steel?

Do linear shape charges have to be in direct contact to perform?

What was acesss/clearance like around the supposed steel core columns in the core?

What do unconstrained high explosive detonations sound like and does that compare to what as heard on 9-11? What does that look like when cutting steel?
Click to expand...

OK so you realize that placing charges on the steel necessary to bring the towers down is not really possible.

Now what if Chris . I'm saying WHAT IF. there was no concrete core? then what?
 
A W Smith said:
from your loose change page Chris



OK so you realize that placing charges on the steel necessary to bring the towers down is not really possible.

Now what if Chris . I'm saying WHAT IF. there was no concrete core? then what?
Click to expand...

Basically it is all impossible. That is my point.

Supporting the steel core columns IS supporting the impossible to obscure the possible​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom