• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Did Bush watch plane hit the first tower ?

Jeezzz :rolleyes: you are one pathetic little child. Instead of putting everybody and his cat on your ignore list, why don't you f*** the hell off and save yourself the trouble?

Well, it was my cat that put me on The List, so I'd say he's well on the way to "everybody and his cat".


 
Well, it was my cat that put me on The List, so I'd say he's well on the way to "everybody and his cat".



lol, it was you and your cat pictures which I was thinking of when I wrote that part :)
 
We can present video footage...of people/persons involved in 9/11 who clearly state WORD FOR WORD...NO INTERPRETATION NEEEEEEEDEDEDDED - something that contradicts the official story, yet these boneheads will just shrug it off like it's nothing.

So if there's "no interpretation needed", why, on the anniversay of 9/11, when the twoofers were shouting "Pull it!" like a bunch of good little nazis, did Alex Jones have to explain to passersby what "Pull it" meant?

Yep, none of that nasty "interpretation" there, nuh-uh!

And I still say the whole Bush quote thing was a politician talking out his a$$. You'd think someone as anti-government as 28k would understand that. He was lying, in an incredibly stupid way. Sort of like a twoofer, come to think of it :)
 
lol, it was you and your cat pictures which I was thinking of when I wrote that part :)

I'm honoured!

I must say, your cat shows greater computing skills than 28K or RemovedBrain do!

Cuter, too.

I think my favourite part of that photo is his tail draped over the edge of the box, as if that's just a perfectly natural place for a tail to be :)
 
I don´t know what it means - so blame Lisa... :D

111074595993565fe0.gif
 
Minority languages: alive and well on JREF, just as long as you only want to know the weather!
 
Well the Bush thing is not without precedent. Neil Armstrong's version of what he said when he stepped on the Moon is different to what the world heard. He had ages to practice his, and I am sure he will go his grave convinced he really said the missing word.

Does that invalidate the Moon Landings? No

So then I am not sure a missing word validates a 911 conspiracy
 
28th Kingdom, it takes a man to admit he was wrong (this in regards to your assumption that DM believes in intelligent design). Are you a man, are you going to admit?
 
Updated ignore list:

Architect
Arkan_Wolfshade
Arus808
beachnut
Foolmewunz
HeyLeroy
Horatius
HyJinX
JimBenArm
Kiwiwriter
mortimer
Regnad Kcin
solidslade
stateofgrace

28th's permanent ignore list:

facts
logic
evidence
reason
math
physics
engineering
material science
reading comprehension
good research
 
28th's permanent ignore list:

facts
logic
evidence
reason
math
physics
engineering
material science
reading comprehension
good research

Bhwahahaha. Great one, Beachnut! :D And humor - off course... :p
 
It's not important for a nation to examine what its leader did during the the most critical hours our nation ever faced. Analysis like what did he say and do are clearly too one sided for consideration. Instead we simply add words to what was said and presto we have the meaning we like. But you guys are the fact based evidentiary types correct? Of course we have direct quotes from John Skilling, Norman Mineta, Richard Clarke, and many others that you guys tell us just aren't true. What an easy strategy. Just say it ain't so.
Also what is the official story of what he knew that day? Isn't it that he was only informed of the second plane hitting, and had not been informed on the first? If so, he is still contradicting that account. He is clearly describing what he did before he went in the classroom. For those of you who couldn't remember what plane crash was shown live, and which wasn't, I recommend memory supplements.
So many of you say this is meaningless because it dosen't prove a conspiracy, but isn't some of the burden of proof on your side. Don't you need to prove that your administration has given a consistent and truthfull account of the days events?. If you dosen't have anything to hide then why not give an open account of what happened.
Finally the fact that this statement has not been made widely known to the public is ridiculous. The media at a minimum should have insisted on an explanation of this statement. Keep up the excuses
 

Back
Top Bottom