• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I would say that the the buildings were designed to demolish and the demolition was designed for the political direction. Of course the proof is what I'm working on.

I don´t know all your thoughts about the issue but i´m
pretty sure that you know that this implies planing the
attacks since the seventies if they planted explosions
during the construction.

My problem is that i don´t see a reason to blow up the
buildings the way it happend. Also it absolutely makes
no sense to fake the WMD-Evidence if they already
had these plans to invade Iraq. If they were able to
pull this off - they would be able to plant WMD´s to
blame Saddam. Till today they did not presented any
connection to 9/11 which means that they were stupid
as hell to blame Saddam if it was an inside job.

But what do you think about that stupid behavior?
 
I would say that the the buildings were designed to demolish and the demolition was designed for the political direction. Of course the proof is what I'm working on.

designed to demolish

sure to sell

I'll have two
 
I would say that the the buildings were designed to demolish and the demolition was designed for the political direction. Of course the proof is what I'm working on.

I am far from being an expert at this kind of thing, but I would think the proof shouldn't require working on...
 
It was damned heavy.

Maxim: If I don't know or understand the science behind an explanation am I allowed to cast the explanation into doubt?

The less you know the more you can blow.

cleaining cat hair
 
Well, considering the "qualified analysts" have failed to explain the exceedingly fast fall rates, the credibility of what our society refers to as "qualified" is VERY much in question.

I've enjoyed providing you with a common sense analysis of what "qualifications" have become.



falll fast

gravity

faster than gravity = anorther world.
 
It seems to me that by not logically and reasonably addressing this reply to your post,

that you have admitted that you cannot do so.

You can put words in my mouth all you want.

The thread is pretty much over, now, since you've admitted that you can't see concrete conclusively in the pictures you've been posting, and that the core columns could be seen in the construction pictures and that they'd be indistinguishable from box columns, anyway.

But thanks for playing.
 
Thanks to corrupt courts and government, I will be lucky to see any family at all this Christmas.

Well, at least you can thank whatever gods you pray to that you're still alive, especially considering how you've uncovered the whole plot of the badguys and how much getting rid of you wouldn't be very risky for them.


Happy holidays.
 
Thanks to corrupt courts and government, I will be lucky to see any family at all this Christmas.

But, hey, .... I always have my wonderful friends online that I can entertain with profound truth vital to their futures. They always love that. It is a small gift to give.

Did anyone else here glance at the first line and read it as "corrupt cores"?

This is fun.

We love you too, Christophera. I think you should let this thread die though.
 
You can put words in my mouth all you want.

The thread is pretty much over, now, since you've admitted that you can't see concrete conclusively in the pictures you've been posting, and that the core columns could be seen in the construction pictures and that they'd be indistinguishable from box columns, anyway.

But thanks for playing.

Pieces of the concrete core is seen here and through out this site,

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

And steel core columns are never seen ANYWHERE and all attempts to misrepresent them have been logically exposed.

Speaking of trying to put words into the mouth of another, if you cannot back that up with a link, you are a freakin' LIAR.

Happy Solstice
 
What are you testing, Oliver ? If you can get a higher postcount by writing MORE irrelevance ? You can.

And yes, you're still on ignore, herr.

Well, if i didn´t knew it better i would think that your
lack of humor implies that you´re a troofer. But maybe
you spend some time to talk WITH Christophera instead
AGAINST him. And do you know why? Because there
will be no productive results in this kind of discussion
against each other. ;)
 
Pieces of the concrete core is seen here and through out this site,

"Pieces of concrete". Would you please alter the image so as to point to each individual "piece", please ? If you can't, it's because you can't see the "pieces".

Of course, all this is academic since you've admitted that dust could produce the same effect.

And steel core columns are never seen ANYWHERE and all attempts to misrepresent them have been logically exposed.

You said that they could be indistinguishable from box columns. And since you've identified box columns just about everywhere in the collapse and construction pictures, the rest is a no brainer.

Don't cry.

Speaking of trying to put words into the mouth of another, if you cannot back that up with a link, you are a freakin' LIAR.

Your wish is my command.

Here you said you didn't know how thick the core columns were, after saying numerous times that the columns we were seeing were too thin to be core columns.

Afterwards, you said this. Now, I think this solves this problem.

Now, do you ALSO want me to dig up the one where you said it could be dust ? I already did not long ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom