28th Kingdom
Unregistered
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2006
- Messages
- 947
For the thousandth time, no less. Great researcher, this new coco-puff kid is!
Smart-ass, eh?
NO SOUP FOR YOU!
For the thousandth time, no less. Great researcher, this new coco-puff kid is!
My point is...the 37 non-severed core columns started to break without any falling mass...so they had to of buckled at the impact floors...and it had to of taken place in the span of one second...and it had to of occurred without any lateral loads...because even the trusses pulling away from the outer perimeter (on the impact floors) would turn into vertical loads, as they swung downwards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Buckled_column.png
And, there wasn't any direct force bearing down on them like in this picture, was there? The 37 non-severed core columns went to the top of the structure so nothing was above them pushing down on them.
im sure youve learned to recognize that crazed look in his eye, lolOkay, I was right, you have lost the right to be taken seriously.
Here's a picture of a cat about to bite me in the foot. This was less painful than reading your post.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/949045873634ea69f.jpg
im sure youve learned to recognize that crazed look in his eye, lol
Yeah, he nailed me while I was fiddling with the camera. Ninja cat, he is.....in retrospect, I'm kind of glad his previous family had him declawed....Although I do have a hypothesis that that is part of why he bites more than other cats I've had. And harder too!
When I first got him, he bit me on the chin once, and it was so bad, I thought for a while that I'd have to shave my beard just to put a bandage on it!
I believe you're the latest troofer to confuse the temporary crane supports for the permanent structure.
Yeah, he nailed me while I was fiddling with the camera. Ninja cat, he is.....in retrospect, I'm kind of glad his previous family had him declawed....Although I do have a hypothesis that that is part of why he bites more than other cats I've had. And harder too!
When I first got him, he bit me on the chin once, and it was so bad, I thought for a while that I'd have to shave my beard just to put a bandage on it!
My point is...the 37 non-severed core columns started to break without any falling mass
You're making a couple of unjustified assumptions here. One is that all the columns had to break before the collapse began. Some could have been broken during the collapse. The other assumption is that it takes a significant amount of time to transfer the load to other columns when a column breaks....so they had to of buckled at the impact floors...and it had to of taken place in the span of one second
They wouldn't turn into purely vertical loads until they were completely vertical. And even this would only happen were the trusses to separate completely from the perimeter columns....and it had to of occurred without any lateral loads...because even the trusses pulling away from the outer perimeter (on the impact floors) would turn into vertical loads, as they swung downwards.
I think that you've just discovered a great way to save on the cost of constructing a building. You only need to use a single core column as long as that column extends thru the roof!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Buckled_column.png
And, there wasn't any direct force bearing down on them like in this picture, was there? The 37 non-severed core columns went to the top of the structure so nothing was above them pushing down on them.
Rats! Smelled out again by a clever troofer, when will we learn we'll never fool them?Let's just all revert back to acting like 2nd graders...as soon as I start edifying you of the undeniable truth. Great work, guys! But, don't make it so obvious next time...it really blows your cover.
People who post pictures of cats in serious threads like this have no grace.
Dumbest post ever in the conspiracy theories subforum?My point is...the 37 non-severed core columns started to break without any falling mass...so they had to of buckled at the impact floors...and it had to of taken place in the span of one second...and it had to of occurred without any lateral loads...because even the trusses pulling away from the outer perimeter (on the impact floors) would turn into vertical loads, as they swung downwards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Buckled_column.png
And, there wasn't any direct force bearing down on them like in this picture, was there? The 37 non-severed core columns went to the top of the structure so nothing was above them pushing down on them.

Dumbest post ever in the conspiracy theories subforum?
![]()
this is descriptive of any one of 28ths post....until he makes his next oneDumbest post ever in the conspiracy theories subforum?
![]()
Excellent point...the core took the vertical load, so when the perimeter columns supposedly broke...it left the cores vulnerable to lateral loads...not vertical loads, which is what the upper falling mass is...it's a vertical load, of course, I know you're gonna say that somehow...it was pushing laterally on the core columns...even though that's not physically possible...but trying to make a possibility out of an impossibility sometimes requires the use of what I like to call...
Remember the 37 non-severed core columns...are still one welded piece from top to bottom - all 1300 feet. Just because the outer perimeter breaks on four floors...doesn't mean those core columns are detached from the upper floors. So you see...no falling mass ever occurred on those core columns, because they were always attached to the upper floors.
Thanks.
Dumbest post ever in the conspiracy theories subforum?
Dumbest post ever in the conspiracy theories subforum?
![]()