• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Questions for 9/11 Truthers

28th Kingdom said:
Apparently, the NISTer can't even articulate exactly what NIST's theory is. ...
Click to expand...
In case you couldn't understand I'll put it as simple terms as i can.

Plane crash into building.
Crash took out and damaged support structures.
plane crash also removed large portions of fireproof material from remaing support structures.
Plane spilled burning fuel on several floors of building and down elevator shafts causing building material to catch fire also
Fire got hot enough to expand and deform metal thus causing more structural damage.
Fire got hot enough to reduce remaing metal structure to half it's strength. Wieght from part of building abouve crash point caused remaining support structures to give away.
Added momentum of part of building abouve crash point caused the rest of the building fall apart.

If you need it in more simply terms:
Plane crash make building go boom.
 
28th Kingdom said:
Here's a question for 9/11 Deniers: Why do all of you claim to have debunked the Planted Explosive Theory (PET) when you have done no such thing?

...from the real hard and overwhelming physical evidence that planted explosives were used?

...
Click to expand...

Pathetic Explosive Theory? Why and how do truthers come up with junk? Where do they teach this crap to truthers?

VPET should be used, VERY Pathetic Explosive Theory. (could this be due to exposure to Alex Jones without having proper education)

Where is the hard and overwhelming physical evidence of truthers?

28th you have no hard facts or physical evidence, you are trashing up the questions for truthers!

Add some questions for truthers or be silent like your facts.
 
I like this thread's demonstration of going from the sublime to the ridiculous.

Perry and others post a multitude of intelligent questions for twoofers, and a trollish twoofer replies with just an argument from ignorance.
:newlol

Yes, TROLL, you are a troll, for trying to derail the thread. Yes, you are derailing, because you haven't even addressed the questions pertinent to your theory/'Feary'. Namely:

Why do seismology readings show no explosions on 9/11?
How could they get the planes to fly into the buildings at the exact spot where the charges were planted?
Why do the world's structural engineers, architects, and demolitions experts side with the government's story? Why do no historians, journalists, sociologists, or political science experts disagree?
If George Bush and the military are big parts of this conspiracy, why would they attack their own headquarters, thus potentially crippling their own leadership?
Why weren't the Helen Keller archives and the Port Authority's records removed from the World Trade Center in advance of the attacks, given the fact that they're irreplaceable?
Why was it necessary to kill the New York Fire Department's Chief?
Why do truthers always ignore the damage the planes caused to the Towers and insist that fires have never brought down steel framed building before?
Why do truthers never tell us who planted the explosives in WTC 1, 2 and 7?
Why do truthers never tell us exactly what happened on 911?
Why do truthers never tell us exactly who was behind 911?
Why do truthers who espouse "controlled demolition" claims never have an explanation of how the difficult, time-consuming and messy preparation work was accomplished undetected in three occupied, working office buildings?
Do Truthers know how funny they are to normal people?



I just can't get over how 28th Kingdom just embodied the twoof movement's idiocy in one fell swoop. :newlol


Plus, this thread had the added bonus of uruk's simple explanation of 9/11 for twoofers:

uruk said:
In case you couldn't understand I'll put it as simple terms as i can.

Plane crash into building.
Crash took out and damaged support structures.
plane crash also removed large portions of fireproof material from remaing support structures.
Plane spilled burning fuel on several floors of building and down elevator shafts causing building material to catch fire also
Fire got hot enough to expand and deform metal thus causing more structural damage.
Fire got hot enough to reduce remaing metal structure to half it's strength. Wieght from part of building abouve crash point caused remaining support structures to give away.
Added momentum of part of building abouve crash point caused the rest of the building fall apart.

If you need it in more simply terms:
Plane crash make building go boom.
Click to expand...

Classic.
 
uruk said:
In case you couldn't understand I'll put it as simple terms as i can.

Plane crash into building.
Crash took out and damaged support structures.
plane crash also removed large portions of fireproof material from remaing support structures.
Plane spilled burning fuel on several floors of building and down elevator shafts causing building material to catch fire also
Fire got hot enough to expand and deform metal thus causing more structural damage.
Fire got hot enough to reduce remaing metal structure to half it's strength. Wieght from part of building abouve crash point caused remaining support structures to give away.
Added momentum of part of building abouve crash point caused the rest of the building fall apart.

If you need it in more simply terms:
Plane crash make building go boom.
Click to expand...
That's about what I would reduce it to as well, if I wanted it to be simple, that is.

Lot's of chaotic things happening in between those steps, but that's what I'd expect from an event of this magnitude.
 
Why do Truthers ignore the seismology, which clearly indicates there were no explosions that day?

Doesn't this dispose of the Planted Explosive Theory as well as all other controlled demolition theories?
 
Last edited:
PerryLogan said:
Why do Truthers ignore the seismology, which clearly indicates there were no explosions that day?
Click to expand...
Hypothesis: Because they would be forced to admit that they originally misinterpreted the seismic data, when they thought it supported them; and therefore are open to have misinterpreted other data as well?
 
I'm glad yall are answering some of these questions for me, because I'm pretty sure the Truthers never will.
 
Have any of the video clips used by Truthers to prove their case been verified or validated by experts? Couldn't they be fakes?
 
I like the concept of this thread, but it's too bad these questions will never get answered. 28th already did what I would expect all CTists to do in responding to all of the questions with a question that has been answered time and time again. When he started the thread that supposedly was going to make us all change our view on 9/11 FOREVER and then basically regurgitated everything from Loose Change, I actually felt more sorry for him than anything. It reminded me of a naive five year old. So I have a couple questions for you 28thK.

-Why did you come here (where people clearly have done their research and know what they are talking about), repeat every point from LC(and then you actually said you didn't like LC, which seemed odd), and expect that YOU were all of a sudden going to change our minds?

-Why did you quit that thread when you were so sure that we were all going to side with you(you never even finished)?

-Why can't you answer any of these questions? Plenty of yours were answered in your thread, and it made you run away, so why do you pose more questions to us when we have already debunked the CD theory, rather than answering the ones we have for you?
 
Why did Bill Clinton give orders to the CIA to kill Osama bin Laden in 1996? Didn't he know about the secret plot?
Why would people who control both parties rig the elections?
Why do 9/11 Truthers repeat racist sterotypes about "Arabs in caves"?
Why was "South Park" cool till it did a send-up of the Truth Movement?
 
Last edited:
This might be a very Scottish joke, but:

Who were the two big boys that did it and ran away?
 
Scottish jokes welcome here.

Why is the government always lying--except when the Truthers like what it says (e.g., the firemen who said they heard explosions)?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom