Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[jhunter1163]

You would have to substantiate this to make it meaningful, otherwise your use of the facts in this instance would be a "last desperate resort of any poster who has run out of ideas" and never had any evidence.

Wha?

 

[Bell]

Were those Americans and "planned to kill" secretly followed with violations of due process?

If so, would you take the perpetrators to court?

 

[Belz...]

IF there was a drop, which there was not,

There had to be, chris. Physical laws, remember ?

it would not be symetrical, and the assymetry would favor the side with the physical damage not the impossible damage to steel by mere fuel fires having inadequate ventilation to develop higher heat.

Of course it would favour the damaged sites. But at the scale of the WTC it wouldn't make much of a difference: The other sides would fail before significant toppling would occur, and the whole thing would fall downwards again. This is exactly what we observe with WTC2.

Get real. This was the most sophisticated demolition to ever take place. So sophisticated that people hardly recognize the uses of high explosives. Stop supporting the obvious infiltration of the US government.

How can you reconcile "So sophisticated that people hardly recognize the uses" with "obvious infiltration" ?

You've forgotton how hitler and goering used the riechstag.

No, I haven't. But they didn't BUILD the reichstag, did they ?

The improved the technique and built a bigger and better "custom" event.

Are you saying that the people who built and demolished the WTC are the same people who caused WWII ?? And how bad ARE they at making things happen, anyway ?

You are too easy to fool, believing the "bigger lie" more "outrageos lie" as herman goering asserted human nature would dictate. Predictable. You are another form of puppet.

That would be true if I believed the things I believe in simply because I was told to. Since I tend to doubt what people tell me, even when it makes sense, simply because I'm a cynical bastard, your claim is false.

 

[tsig]

The engineers believe FEMAs description of the structure and I know it was different so what the engineers have defined is in error.

Is there any web site that uses raw images of the towers coming down to define the structural elements of the them.

Try taking "Statics and Strengths of Materiels I & II."

Then we may talk on an equal level

 

[Christophera]

Wha?

Timble is accusing me of doing what Timble is doing.

 

[Christophera]

Try taking "Statics and Strengths of Materiels I & II."

Then we may talk on an equal level

Try some raw images of steel core columns first.

Here is the steel reinforced tubular concrete core of WTC 2

 

[Christophera]

That would be true if I believed the things I believe in simply because I was told to. Since I tend to doubt what people tell me, even when it makes sense, simply because I'm a cynical bastard, your claim is false.

You don't have the official construction plans for the towers. nobody does, (explain that???) and you have no raw evidence of images of steel core columns from the demo showing any of the supposed 47, 1300 foot tempered stel core columns at some elevation abover ground clearly showing the columns in the core area.

Who is the "believer" and who has material facts?

 

[Christophera]

If so, would you take the perpetrators to court?

What court? Show me a functional court that can take a civil action and treat it lawfully, rightfully.

Show me a DA that will make an information for prosecution based on evidence.

 

[tsig]

Try some raw images of steel core columns first.

Here is the steel reinforced tubular concrete core of WTC 2

Steel yields. It is not universally strong.

 

[Bell]

What court? Show me a functional court that can take a civil action and treat it lawfully, rightfully.

Hell if I know. I don't live in the US, remember? Take it to the supreme court, for all I know. A case this big belongs to be handled there, I guess.

Show me a DA that will make an information for prosecution based on evidence.

Well, you have all the raw evidence that proves an inside job. No DA can deny that, and therefor is bound to make a case.

 

[tsig]

What court? Show me a functional court that can take a civil action and treat it lawfully, rightfully.

Show me a DA that will make an information for prosecution based on evidence.

I think most courts in the USA are funcional, the one you went to worked.

 

[Bell]

I think most courts in the USA are funcional, the one you went to worked.

lol

 

[tsig]

Try some raw images of steel core columns first.

Here is the steel reinforced tubular concrete core of WTC 2

Eat'em raw. Nothing like evaporated steel in the morning.

 

[tsig]

lol

Hi Bell,

We seem to be the only ones left.

Are we at one with Chris?

 

[delphi_ote]

Are we at one with Chris?

I won't let you guys get trapped in here forever! This is too much for your minds to endure. Get out while you still can! Here... I'll distract him while you make a break for it.

Hey, Chris. Do you have any proof that there were concrete cores?

Quickly now. Run for freedom!

 

[Powa]

What court? Show me a functional court that can take a civil action and treat it lawfully, rightfully.

Show me a DA that will make an information for prosecution based on evidence.

Then FFS call CNN or FOX or someone! By doing nothing you're denying the 3,000 victims justice! Can you really live with yourself being too lazy to do something? How will you explain to your children why daddy did nothing to protect their rights and freedom?

 

[Christophera]

I won't let you guys get trapped in here forever! This is too much for your minds to endure. Get out while you still can! Here... I'll distract him while you make a break for it.

Hey, Chris. Do you have any proof that there were concrete cores?

Quickly now. Run for freedom!

Yes, way more than you do for steel core columns. And mine is RAW EVIDENCE of images from the demolition exposing all the major elements of the towers.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

Do you have a web site using RAW EVIDENCE of inages from the demo PROVING stel croe columms?

 

[Christophera]

Then FFS call CNN or FOX or someone! By doing nothing you're denying the 3,000 victims justice! Can you really live with yourself being too lazy to do something? How will you explain to your children why daddy did nothing to protect their rights and freedom?

Basically I see you are ignorant of the true condition of our legal systems and law enforcement and will not be educated, then ask me to go use dysfunctional systems.

Get real. I've been there and done that. Now it's your turn unless, ........... you support the infiltration and murder of innocent people, then you'll do nothing other than what you have been doing.

 

[Christophera]

I think most courts in the USA are funcional, the one you went to worked.

Do you call a judge allowingfailure to appear on subpoena by a defendant in a case where it is alleged lives were lost because of the defendants neglect "working".

So much for your interlligence and ability to recognize societal function.

 

[tsig]

I won't let you guys get trapped in here forever! This is too much for your minds to endure. Get out while you still can! Here... I'll distract him while you make a break for it.

Hey, Chris. Do you have any proof that there were concrete cores?

Quickly now. Run for freedom!

It was a valiant effort, but the cores ore irrevalnt. Thanks, but the monster will consume us all. NEVER>>>NEVETR