Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[Oliver]

You are correct. I am convinced, but it is not an idea. And, ....... convinced is not really the right word. The word is, ....... I know.

This is knowledge beyond any shadow of any doubt. I watched the documentary and knew exactly what I was seeing and hearing all through it. I remembered it before I even knew FEMA was trying to tell the world it had steel core columns.

When I found that out, ....... I got a sick feeling about a BIG infiltration into the US government.

The documentary again. One of my personal favorites, Alfred.
So when did you see that documentary - are you sure it was
not a porno? Or maybe it was a comic - or a medical book
you was reading while waiting in a waiting room of a psychologist,
or somethig like that?

How many years is this ago that you saw the "documentary".
Did you start a search within the internet to see how many
"documentaries" were made about the towers?

Are you sure they showed all the explosives and how they
were installed during the construction?

Are you sure it was no psychical kind of mental defect. Such
paranoia exist - nothing personal.

 

[Oliver]

Oh, I know it's in vain.

I understand why chris is arguing, here. He's utterly convinced of his ideas. Though I disagree and I suspect, with evidence, that he has some mental problem, his behaviour is expected.

Oh, I know it's in vain.

I understand why belz is arguing, here. He's utterly convinced of his ideas. Though I disagree and I suspect, with evidence, that he has some mental problem, his behaviour is expected

 

[Oliver]

The same common sense that tells you the Earth is flat and heavier objects fall faster ?

Please stop your personal insults. Chris may have a serious
psychic probem but he never said that the earth is flat.

I guess your claim that it fell "too fast" is bunk, then.

Maybe it fell to fast because the camera did recorder did
not work correctly. So the video plays faster than in real time.

Irrelevant.

Yes, indeed. Irrelevant.

You've just shown that your "near free fall" argument is based on gut feelings.

And, What´s wrong with it, clown? All theories are based on
some lousy facts combined with a gut feeling. Have a problem
with it? See you in another thread.

I don't see how believing REAL evidence has anything to do with any government, lawless or otherwise.

Could you explain what you didm´t understand about it?

Argument by association, I guess.

Guessing does not help at all when argumenting. Please stop it.

Yes, chronic back pains can be very annoying.

So why do you know something about it in your young life?

Also, appeal to emotion.

Dito.

 

[Oliver]

Funny. You manage to contradict yourself in two consecutive posts. Guess that solves the question of your memory.

I think this was just a mistake of him so you shouldn´t
criticize him for this simple lack of his attention.

 

[Oliver]

That's because you ASSUME that there were cutting charges, an entirely circular line of reasoning.

None of which show concrete. You're saying that one shows box columns, and THEN we see rebar ?

I see rebar, too. What´s wrong with that?

 

[Oliver]

If it's your birfday I ain't saying nothing about sex.

BTW: When was your day of birt, Alfred?

http://people.tribe.net/5fe7438a-f90c-4902-b7af-ff4eaf90d737
Age 53 (true?)
I am a spirit warrior using the instincts of love as a force compelled with understanding to inspire creations that have divine potentials which focus us in our potentials.

 

[Oliver]

What the hell are you trying to say here? Could you, please, atleast make an effort on making coherent sentences? Jeez, your writing is almost as foggy as your brain.

And where is my requested picture where you point out the rebar?

*lol* Shall we bet which Picture he will show you ... TO PROOF ANYTHING - EVEN GOD?

 

[Oliver]

Maxim:
If a suppossed explantion does not explain the event, it is not the truth. No explanation that does not explain the event can be the truth.

So far no explanation in existence explains free fall and total pulverization of the towers appears to exist. Has anyone seen one?

Okay, Alfred. Please define your initial statement again
after we discussed the issue long enough. Is it still the
same question you have?

 

[Oliver]

BTW, Alfred.

I just found another LIE of you:
http://www.beliefnet.com/boards/message_list.asp?boardID=1052&discussionID=257204

You do not beliefe in god, definitively. Otherwise you wouldn´t
torture his creations and cast doubt on his decisions.

ETA: Do you still believe in the free fall thing? You could sum up
all the crap you believe so far. Thank you.

 

[Bell]

I make compound sentences. Sometimes they don't work. I've got too much to say and too little time to say it.

3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS

Yes, and now draw arrows on that picture that point to the alleged rebar? I asked this before.

 

[Oliver]

Yes, and now draw arrows on that picture that point to the alleged rebar? I asked this before.

*BUMB* Just in case Bell is on your ignore list.

 

[gumboot]

I can't believe you people are still posting in this thread.

Unbelievable. You must be suckers for punishment. I bet whn you get home at night you dress in leather and hang yourself from the ceiling via hooks.

I mean, Belz, I can understand. He's Satan. That sort of self-torture is a given (though always better if someone ELSE is doing the hook-hanging!). But the rest of you? I'm surprised.



Carry on.

-Gumboot

 

[Bell]

Okay, retracted. However your response did not show that my analysis of the "towers fell in the wrong order" was illogical.

Alas, since you are lying about the wrong tower falling first - you failed to show us evidence, only your own 'analysis' - there is nothing to respond to.

 

[Bell]

I can't believe you people are still posting in this thread.

Unbelievable. You must be suckers for punishment. I bet whn you get home at night you dress in leather and hang yourself from the ceiling via hooks.

I mean, Belz, I can understand. He's Satan. That sort of self-torture is a given (though always better if someone ELSE is doing the hook-hanging!). But the rest of you? I'm surprised.



Carry on.

-Gumboot

You have no idea how difficult it is to type that way

 

[Oliver]

I can't believe you people are still posting in this thread.

Unbelievable. You must be suckers for punishment. I bet whn you get home at night you dress in leather and hang yourself from the ceiling via hooks.

I mean, Belz, I can understand. He's Satan. That sort of self-torture is a given (though always better if someone ELSE is doing the hook-hanging!). But the rest of you? I'm surprised.



Carry on.

-Gumboot

*lol* You may come back in a year to see HOW much
we enjoy this self-torture...

 

[twinstead]

So, for the millionth time, no Chris there is NOT a "realistice" explanation of for the free fall of the towers, because they DID NOT FALL FREE FALL.

 

[Oliver]

So, for the millionth time, no Chris there is NOT a "realistice" explanation of for the free fall of the towers, because they DID NOT FALL FREE FALL.

And i say there is nothing like freefall because it
depends on how your brain does interprets it...

 

[Mobyseven]

ON EDIT. BTW, I am a surveyor and do that all the time with 1.25" range poles and they cannot be seen. I use a 2.5" PVC pipe which is barely visible at that distance.

So, you are admitting that the 3" rebar you claim is in the photo would in fact NOT show up at the distance and with the resolution that your 'evidence' photo was taken at. Just in case you missed it the first time:

...1.25" range poles and they cannot be seen...

...2.5" PVC pipe which is barely visible at that distance

 

[Mobyseven]

You are correct. I am convinced, but it is not an idea. And, ....... convinced is not really the right word. The word is, ....... I know.

I know a lot of things. I know that the Earth orbits the sun. I know that cyanide makes for bad milkshake flavouring. I know that if you double the frequency of a note you will get same note one octave higher.

I know these things because they have been empirically tested and have stood up to all tests so far. They are believable beyond reasonable doubt. If all of a sudden they failed an empirical test, then I would have reason to doubt these things until another explanation is found. I would not, however, know what that explanation is, only that a better one exists.

I also believe a number of things. I believe in God. I do not believe in the concept of hell, or eternal damnation. (I'm Jewish by the way). I have no evidence to support these metaphysical assertions, I can only say, 'I believe.'

Your hypothesis falls under the category of 'beliefs' until you can find some empirical evidence to back up your theory.

This is knowledge beyond any shadow of any doubt. I watched the documentary and knew exactly what I was seeing and hearing all through it. I remembered it before I even knew FEMA was trying to tell the world it had steel core columns.

Then tell us the name of the documentary. Tell us how we might go about viewing it.

If it is the PBS documentary that has been found by another member, what do you say to the fact that it apparently at no point mentions a concrete core? Or is that a different documentary?

Just tell us the name of the documentary to give us a starting point. Or an approximate air-date.

When I found that out, ....... I got a sick feeling about a BIG infiltration into the US government.

Take your meds then.

 

[bonavada]

This issue of the severe sharp crack noise made by uncontained high explosives is one that I use to argue against the steel core columns. Very important point and your recognition of that is very reasonable.
The supposed 47, 1,300 foot steel core columns would require 1,300 + cutting charges to be cut into the lengths found at GZ. That, ........ completely changes the character of what was seen and heard. TOTALLY.

so your reasoning is:-

no evidence that the steel core columns were cut explosively..........
=
...................proof that steel core columns did not exist!

that argument holds less water than a dead dingo's donger...........

BV