• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
mortimer said:
Chris,

No, Chris, you claimed progressive collapses have certain properties. It's your responsibility to prove it. Please do so.
Click to expand...

If you had proven that the structure you claim existed did exist, your request might be valid. You have not proven this with qualified information. Meaning raw evidence of images showing the the core area with steel columns at an elevation above the ground.

As it is, what you are doing is evasion.
 
mortimer said:
So you cannot prove that the North tower had a concrete core from RAW demo images. Noted.

Using your logic, since there are no images of a concrete core in the North tower from the demo, then there is no concrete core in the North tower.
Click to expand...

Because no one has provided a competent explanation of what this image shows if it does not show rebar, and the image also does not show the supposed steel core columns, I have provided adequate evidence as the towers were twins and here is the south.

 
Christophera said:
If you had proven that the structure you claim existed did exist, your request might be valid. You have not proven this with qualified information. Meaning raw evidence of images showing the the core area with steel columns at an elevation above the ground.

As it is, what you are doing is evasion.
Click to expand...

What was the name of the documentary?
How old were you when you watched it?
When was it aired.
Did you researched how many documentaries
are out there about the WTC-construction?
 
Last edited:
can someone prove that there was in fact 2 buildings in NYC called the Twin Towers? I am not sure they even existed even though I was inside them.
 
Garb said:
You failed to comment on my other picture that shows the entire core. No concrete.
Click to expand...

Okay, so you do ont know what you've posted a picture of and just believe whatever you read.

The other picture would have to be the aerial that shows the elevator guide rail supports in the core area.

For your information, the image you posted shows the core area on the left side and does not look into the core. The camera looks past it. The concrete was up to 40 feet below the top floor average.
 
Bell said:
WHAT??!!! AA11 was supposed to hit the south tower on the WEST side? Excuse me, but once again I have to use the laughing dog...

:dl:

I'm still waiting for RAW evidence, Christophera. Show me the raw evidence that the pilot disobeyed his orders, Show me raw evidence that he was supposed to hit the south tower. Like a written order, a video confession. No assumptions or conclusions. Put up or shut up.
Click to expand...

The story you support make no sense at all. I make sense of it.

The fact the wrong tower fell first is evidence. The fact the tops of the towers fell the wrong directions is raw evidence. Common knowledge.

All very carefully explained here.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1207667
 
firecoins said:
can someone prove that there was in fact 2 buildings in NYC called the Twin Towers? I am not sure they even existed even though I was inside them.
Click to expand...

Well, since Chris Alfred proved that god can not
exist i guess there is no way to proof that there
ever was a wtc in new york...
 
Once again:

Chris, why didn't anyone else in the world hear about this 1990 PBS documentary that showed, in detail, how explosives were planted in the towers? I was a PBS member then, and that was definitely NOT n my Program Guide!

Why are you the only one to ever hear of this? Does that give you pause?

Why is there not a single mention of it on the internet, except on your sites? Why does PBS, the Library of Congress, etc. have no knowledge of the documentary?

Why is there not a single news report, anywhere, about one of the biggest stories in US history?

And Chris, if you worked on or in those buildings, don't you think you'd be a wee bit upset that you were sitting on thousands of pounds of high explosives?

Don't you think that after the 1993 bombing people would have said, "Were those the built-in explosives that were featured in that TV show, or were they new explosives?"

How do you explain these discrepancies, Chris?
 
Gravy said:
Once again:

Chris, why didn't anyone else in the world hear about this 1990 PBS documentary that showed, in detail, how explosives were planted in the towers? I was a PBS member then, and that was definitely NOT n my Program Guide!

Why are you the only one to ever hear of this? Does that give you pause?

Why is there not a single mention of it on the internet, except on your sites? Why does PBS, the Library of Congress, etc. have no knowledge of the documentary?

Why is there not a single news report, anywhere, about one of the biggest stories in US history?

And Chris, if you worked on or in those buildings, don't you think you'd be a wee bit upset that you were sitting on thousands of pounds of high explosives?

Don't you think that after the 1993 bombing people would have said, "Were those the built-in explosives that were featured in that TV show, or were they new explosives?"

How do you explain these discrepancies, Chris?
Click to expand...

Wow,

You checked with everybody in the whole world. Man, are you thorough.


I've encounterd at least 3 people that saw the video or clips from it that know of the core. Your statement is misrepresenting what I've said because I have not ever said the documentary stated there were explosives were built into the towers.

I have deduced this fact along with many thousands of others that know what explosions look like by simply viewing the many images that appear as the below does..



http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3962&stc=1&d=1162779447
 

Attachments

  • corefacesexploding.jpg
    corefacesexploding.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 2
Christophera said:
Wow,

You checked with everybody in the whole world. Man, are you thorough.


I've encounterd at least 3 people that saw the video or clips from it that know of the core.
Click to expand...
You're lying or delusional. No one has seen that video because it never existed.

Your statement is misrepresenting what I've said because I have not ever said the documentary stated there were explosives were built into the towers.
Click to expand...
You're lying or delusional.

Christophera said:
The RDX on the vertical bar was exposed for months due to bad weather, the documentary actually had this information

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1895911&postcount=3039
Click to expand...
So which is it, Chris? Are you lying or delusional?
 
Christophera said:
Wow,

You checked with everybody in the whole world. Man, are you thorough.


I've encounterd at least 3 people that saw the video or clips from it that know of the core. Your statement is misrepresenting what I've said because I have not ever said the documentary stated there were explosives were built into the towers.

I have deduced this fact along with many thousands of others that know what explosions look like by simply viewing the many images that appear as the below does..



http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3962&stc=1&d=1162779447
Click to expand...


I can tell what things are just by looking at them.

I am so good that the police often ask fo my help.
 
Christophera said:
The RDX on the vertical bar was exposed for months due to bad weather, the documentary actually had this information, and the concrete was poured before the "special plastic anti corrosion/vibration coating" was tested. After testing it was determined that it was no longer viable as a protectant. Removal of the concrete was considered but the cost and delay was too much so constrcution continued.
Click to expand...

Gravy said:
Bolding mine.

That's it for me. I'll buy you a beer, Regnad.

ETA: please get help, Christophera. You are not well.
Click to expand...

The BBC as producer is a typo. Basically your tactic is to ask me the same questions enough time so I make a typo then you only refer to that.

Intellectual dishonesty is common.

The documentary only had this information.

vertical bar was exposed for months due to bad weather

not the part about the RDX.

You are being selective with my words.

Which is all you can do because you have no evidence and no explanations.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
 
DHR said:
Knowing the orders makes you part af the conspiricy, are you part of the cover-up?
Click to expand...

The ability to use logic does not make one a part of anything except the human race. Are you working to make yourself an exception?

The purpose of reason is to protect life. Would you like to defeat that?
 
delphi_ote said:
Impossible. This is why you are supposed to present the evidence supporting your claim. Point us to the documentary. We're not taking your word for it.
Click to expand...

The documentary will only be found by citizens using logic and demanding the truth.

Meanwhile you still have to prove that the tower was constructed as FEMA said it was with steel core columns. And I have proven it was constructed with a concrete core here,

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
 
Gravy said:
You're lying or delusional. No one has seen that video because it never existed.
Click to expand...

How could I possible interpret the images of this web site so consistently if I did not have the real information.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html


Gravy said:
You're lying or delusional.

So which is it, Chris? Are you lying or delusional?
Click to expand...

Clearly you support liars and wish I was delusional.

You forgot the
Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Inovation that was published in 1992. There is a great deal of support for th truth as much as you do not like it.
 
Christophera said:
The ability to use logic does not make one a part of anything except the human race. Are you working to make yourself an exception?

The purpose of reason is to protect life. Would you like to defeat that?
Click to expand...

Hi Chris


I was not aware that most humans used logic.

You may be the exception.

Reason and life are not compatible!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom