Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[Christophera]

Also Christophera, how do you know the buildings were rigged with uhmplosives? How do you know that the concrete bore had 3" rebar on 4' centers coated with C4 in them? Was this in the documentary as well? You would not have made this up, now would you?

The below image shows an event which can only be created by high explosive optimally placed and distributed inside of a uniform mineral based material then exploded in a series of delayed high speed explosions.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3949&stc=1&d=1162694516

 

[Christophera]

Care to point out where it isn't consitent instead of giving me a link filled with a bunch of info that I have to sort through to find out the single idea you are trying to get me to belive?

The single piece of info is that the towers had concrete cores and the raw evidence supports that assertion.

Go look. Whadda'ya think, that this is TV?

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

 

[Oliver]

The below image shows an event which can only be created by high explosive

BS! The Photo could be a faked one and
i guess Killtown would say the same.

 

[Bell]

The below image shows an event which can only be created by high explosive optimally placed and distributed inside of a uniform mineral based material then exploded in a series of delayed high speed explosions.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3949&stc=1&d=1162694516

Yes, you are showing us a picture - an event frozen in time - of a very fast chancing event. From that, you conclude uhmplosives were used. That is not what I asked. I asked for PROOF of uhmplosives. Like Mohawks admitting prepping your 3" rebar on 4' centers with C4. Or uhmplosive factories admitting supplying for the WTC. You do have this evidence, do you?

 

[Oliver]

The single piece of info is that the towers had concrete cores and the raw evidence supports that assertion.

Go look. Whadda'ya think, that this is TV?

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

T´wasa comic i guess. 9/11 never happend. It was
just a futuristic documentary you saw some years ago
but you don´t remeber it very well. I can help you:
It´s name was loose change. And it wasn´t real.

 

[TruthSeeker1234]

hey chris......you've been at this a very long time now, but there are some basic general questions i think need answering by you.

you believe the WTC was destroyed not by islamic extremists but by americans? i'll take that as read.

so please, why would these people:-

wait so long after the planes crashed before setting off the C4? why not explode the charges immediately following the impacts? this would have caused many more casualties = even greater outrage = more excuses for overseas adventurism.

Because they would not have fires to blame for the "collapses". The idea was to minimize casualties, while maximizing psychological impact.

allow the south tower to collapse first? why not blow the north tower as this was hit first?

because the fires were almost going out in the south tower, while still burning fiercely in the north.

and:-
why bother steering a jet plane into each prior to CD anyway? if the buildings were so effectively rigged for CD as you insist, why the overkill? why not the government/whoever "simply" concoct evidence that terrorists planted bombs in the buildings prior to 9/11?

BV

No one would believe that outsiders could get access. Also, part of the plan was to take over security at all airports. Without planes, there is no excuse to do this.

 

[Christophera]

Under the conditions present where the WTC 2 core is, drywall would no even exist. It would be stripped away immediately.

Only under your demolitions theory. Clearly, the drywall is STILL there in clearer pictures, so there was no detonation. Or do you retract your statement ?

Clearly you refer to other pictures. At the distance of the WTC 2 core linked above only the shape and logic is available to determine what the material is. Bascially you commit distortion of the import evidence by not posting the evidence you imply exists.

People can make web sites out of non-existent ideas, too. So it doesn't prove a thing.

Notice no one built a web site to document the steel core columns with raw evidence but I built one using raw evidence to substantiate the steel reinforced concrete core and it is substantiated and consistent with links to universities, Ph.D's and other credible, disinterested sources.

 

[Bell]

Because they would not have fires to blame for the "collapses". The idea was to minimize casualties, while maximizing psychological impact.

2700+ death, yeah, that's minimizing the number of victims.

because the fires were almost going out in the south tower, while still burning fiercely in the north.

Proof of fires in the south tower going out? And don't bring me chief's Palmer quote, he was on the 78th floor, below the hugh fires.

No one would believe that outsiders could get access. Also, part of the plan was to take over security at all airports. Without planes, there is no excuse to do this.

You are contradicting your self. Why would nobody believe outsiders could get access, but believe outsiders where able to bring weapons aboard and hijack planes? You can't have it both ways.

 

[Gravy]

because the fires were almost going out in the south tower, while still burning fiercely in the north.

Is it necessary to be a howling ignoramus in every post, TruthSeeker1234?

7 Minutes Before Collapse
​

 

[stateofgrace]

No one would believe that outsiders could get access. Also, part of the plan was to take over security at all airports. Without planes, there is no excuse to do this.

You come out with some much nonsense now a days TS but could you just explain what on earth you are talking about here?

Taking over the airports?

I am curious for your spin on this one.

 

[mortimer]

If you check the post 2nd above, in reply to delphi_ote you will find your answer.

Chris,

We are talking about the North tower, not the South tower. Please pay attention.

Show me RAW evidence of the North tower's concrete core at elevation in demo photos. After all, that is the evidence you demand of us to prove steel core columns.

 

[mortimer]

Notice no one built a web site to document the steel core columns with raw evidence but I built one using raw evidence to substantiate the steel reinforced concrete core and it is substantiated and consistent with links to universities, Ph.D's and other credible, disinterested sources.

Another lie, Chris? This website was built to document the steel core columns with raw evidence, and it is substantiated and consistent with links to universities, Ph.D's and other credible, disinterested sources.

 

[mortimer]

The below image shows an event which can only be created by high explosive optimally placed and distributed inside of a uniform mineral based material then exploded in a series of delayed high speed explosions.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3949&stc=1&d=1162694516

Bull. It could also have been created by a progressive collapse of a tall building after severe structural damage caused by airplane crashes and fire.

 

[LashL]

Dear Christophera:

There were not and never have been concrete cores in the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York.

Please seek the professional help that you so desperately and so obviously require.

Love,
The Rest of the World.

 

[Gravy]

gravy you are misrepresenting what I've stated. If I said the documentary titled "Construction of the Twin Towers" was produced by BBC I was in error. It was produced by PBS. Also, .......... the documentary di not say "it was packed with demolitions explosives". It said there was a special plastic coating on the rebar which was flammable and that only welders with a security clearance could weld it.

This is true intellectual dishonesty colluding with Bell and Ollie.

Thank you for that correction. I apologize for making it necessary. I should have said "Carefully packed with demolitions explosives." I meant to cast no aspersions on the good people who do the dangerous and exacting work of planting explosives in new buildings.

 

[Christophera]

Bull. It could also have been created by a progressive collapse of a tall building after severe structural damage caused by airplane crashes and fire.

And you could also be here because the stork brought you.

A progressive collpase has geometric properties as members fall. We have none of that, we have pulverization that obliterates with its separate delay systems of the floor and cores. The floors with their light weight concrete form a light diffusive cloud and hide the blasts occuring inside when the towers are tall.

Here is an aerial of the concrete core explosions in the lower section and the heaving heavy particulate is visible from the thicker lower walls.

Here the lower section begins.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3951&stc=1&d=1162702515

 

[Christophera]

Dear Christophera:

There were not and never have been concrete cores in the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York.

Please seek the professional help that you so desperately and so obviously require.

Love,
The Rest of the World.

Without evidence you are deluded, accepting a lie as your psyche is dominated by cognitive disonance.


You abandon all reason in the face of the official corruption of removing evidence from the scene of 3000 capitol crimes as a subversion of our Constitution and due process to satisfy a crusade.

Get rational, be and stand for accountabilite to lawful principles.

We love you too.

 

[Christophera]

Thank you for that correction. I apologize for making it necessary. I should have said "Carefully packed with demolitions explosives." I meant to cast no aspersions on the good people who do the dangerous and exacting work of planting explosives in new buildings.

Ya' might check to see if Ollie is up to giving some spam lessons.

 

[TruthSeeker1234]

You come out with some much nonsense now a days TS but could you just explain what on earth you are talking about here?

Taking over the airports?

I am curious for your spin on this one.

Prior to 9/11, security at U.S. airports was handled by private companies. The U.S. Federal government took over, and installed the "TSA", Transportation Security Administration.

 

[Gravy]

Odd, there isn't a single concrete-pulverizing explosion as the south tower begins to collapse. Not one!

​