Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

Russell, I'm baffled as to why you don't want to discuss these very simple questions?:

Pardalis said:
Russell, you asked that we discuss the details of your so-called CD?

When were the towers rigged?

How were the towers rigged?

By whom were the towers rigged?

What explosives were used?

How much people were involved?

How much time did it take?

Thanks for discussing
Click to expand...

CD is your pet theory now. Don't you want to study every angle?
 
......just a little bit after 5 o’clock.

And as I approached, came down, saw the big hubbub going on around building 7, walked around it, I saw a hole. I didn’t see a hole bad enough to knock a building down though. I saw, you know, yeah, there was definitely fire in the building, you know, but I didn’t hear any, you know, anyways maybe this is movie crap, I didn’t hear any creaking or I didn’t hear any indication that it was gonna come down and all of a sudden the radios exploded and everybody started screaming “get away, get away, get away from it” and I was like a deer in the headlights and I look up and I think, I think I remember pretty clearly with two guys that I knew were on the transit radio, I don’t know if those tapes are out there but I can try and look for them and show you exactly what I’m talking about, but it was that moment, you know, get away, man, I looked up and it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life, you know. The thing started peeling in on itself.

I mean, there was an umbrella of crap seven feet over my head that I just stared at and somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running and the ◊◊◊◊’s hitting the ground behind me and the whole time you’re hearing “thoom, thoom, thoom, thoom, thoom” so. I think I know an explosion when I hear it, you know.

That was your worst argument yet.

Tell me what was essential that I left out for brevity indicated by a hyphen?
 
Russell Pickering said:
Question:



How do you pull centralized columns inwards?

Did the fires melt the 47 core columns?

How did the core come straight down?
Click to expand...


If the floor trusses are connected at their ends to the external columns AND the internal columns then the pull is towards the centre of the truss, not the centre of the building.

The NIST report is concerned with what initiates the collapse....what causes the catastrophic failure of the structure.

The floor trusses are always going to be the most likely weakest link in the structure because they are lightweight engineered members (In other words instead of using a large steel beam to span from the outer columns to the inner, they use a designed structure of thin steel members some of which are in tension and some which are in compression but as a whole they have the same loading capacity as a single large (and heavy) steel beam) and with any truss design each small member plays a part in providing strength to the truss as a whole. It's possible that if you live in a house with a pitched roof and go and have a look up in your roofspace you will see roof trusses. In the UK the most common type of roof truss is called a 'fink' and on elevation it is basically a triangle of small timber members (the rafters and ceiling joists) with a 'W' arrangement of small timber members filling the space within the triangle. If you damage or remove any of those members you dramatically weaken the truss. A conventional roof would have much larger rafters and ceiling joists and the space within the triagle would be clear. But this makes the roof heavier and more expensive to construct, so trusses are favoured for certain types of construction.

The WTC floor beams were also designed to be lightweight and cheaper than raising and placing huge steel beams.

The sag of the truss is due to the effect of heat on these small steel sections, which is why fire protection is important. However if the fire protection is missing, damaged or destroyed by impact then the trusses become vulnerable.

As the truss sags it pulls on the connections with the external and internal columns. At some point those connections are going to fail or the connection between the columns above and below are going to fail.

This initiates the collapse because, just as with the truss, the building as a whole is an engineered structure which stands because all of the members are working together to defy gravity.

The columns hold up the trusses, but the vertical loads on those columns makes them want to move outwards, just as your pitched roof rafter wants to spread outwards where it meets the external wall but is restrained by the ceiling joists (or bottom chord of the roof truss), and so the restraining member is placed under tension.

The columns of the wtc tower are pulling against the floor trusses and the floor trusses are pushing down on the columns.

When one or other of these fails, then that section of the building is unstable and becomes dependant upon the redundancy (the ability of other members to take additional loading) of the remaining structure to maintain it's integrity.

However, take out enough of the structure, and apply heat to the remainder, and you have a structural failure waiting to happen unless you can remove the heat and repair the damage (or temporary support the structure)

Once the failure is initiated it can only snowball as the already damaged structure is now receiving further damage from the parts of the structure that fail first. So if the structure fails locally at the original area of damage, the structure above this point of failure is going to stress beyond it's ability to work as originally designed, in just the same way that removing a given portion of your external wall will result in the roof collapsing because skyhooks have yet to be invented.

Now that the collapse is initiated the members which made up the structure will, to all intents and purposes, resort back to their original state. In other words, a steel column which was delivered to the contruction site on the back of a lorry will most likely end up being removed from the site of the collapse on the back of another lorry.

phew!

I hope that helps
Someone
Somewhere.
 
Gravy said:
Careful! That line of questioning is what got me banned there. Also, they have pledged to not to reveal the plot until every last detail is uncovered. No doubt they have made huge progress towards proving the inside job in the past few months, but it could be a few more months before all the pieces are in place.
Click to expand...

They don't have the answers! They're JAQing.

Oh, and Gravy, what has happened to your avatar, man? I mean, trying to be scary for Halloween is one thing, but this!!!!
 
Russell Pickering said:
My cards are and have been on the table. I can say one thing for sure - I am even more convinced of a conspiracy since coming here and looking into this.
Click to expand...
Despite having numerous misconceptions of yours corrected, and not being able to answer basic questions.

'Kay. Good luck with that.

When will we be seeing your physics and probability calculations that prove the official version impossible, Russell? Seriously, when? Since you make the claim, you must have those calculations handy, right?
 
Russell Pickering said:
Tell me what was essential that I left out for brevity indicated by a hyphen?
Click to expand...

The context.

It's when you read the whole thing that it's hard to avoid realizing that his story is pretty tenuous.

Oh, and I'm shocked that you missed the part where the radios exploded since you are so keen on the word.
 
Last edited:
LashL said:
The context.

It's when you read the whole thing that it's hard to avoid realizing that his story is pretty tenuous.

Oh, and I'm shocked that you missed the part where the radios exploded since you are so keen on the word.
Click to expand...

I wonder if they pulled them out of their pockets first?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom