Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

Usual Suspect said:
But you have to admit Gravy not debunking Craig or Steele is pretty funny.
Click to expand...


No I find comments like "the towers came straight down" and "their collapses were identical" to be pretty funny. In fact, I find them to be hilarious.

I laugh at people who can look at an apple and claim it is an orange. Such people are amusing.

-Gumboot
 
Russell Pickering said:
Wildcat,

I was treated so as well. You can read my first thread again.

Not by you. You and a few others were gracious.

I just think the treatment and opinion of CT's here is generally poor and unscientific.

This thread is an example: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=66868

It just just doesn't fell "sciencey" to me.

Russell
Click to expand...
Russell, many here are not familiar w/ you and jumped the gun a bit. Tends to happen when 95% of CTers have been far closer to US than you. Hell, you're the only one to date capable of carrying on a debate.

It's not just CTers who have a hard time here either - psychics, homeopaths, bigfoot believers, creationists (and religious types in general), moon landing hoax believers, people who talk to the dead, etc have it just as bad. What we want is evidence - not feelings, or conjecture, or belief. Only evidence works here. And while you're trying, you have a long way to go. Picking one witness out of hundreds who thinks he heard bombs going off, or finding the one engineer among thousands who disagrees w/ the NIST report won't quite cut it. Unless that one person really does have an air-tight case of course.

At any rate, you'd no doubt have a much better time here if it wasn't for the likes of US and Jessica spamming what could be interesting threads w/ their trollish behavior. Not that getting rid of them would help, 2 more will just pop up in their place...


Anyway, I feel your pain on this thread. I'm going to bed and tomorrow I'm just gonna watch football.
bearbang.gif
 
jessicarabbit said:
Your opinion but I was told earlier that it was a guaranteed fake by some people. I intend to clear that up if thats ok hun
Click to expand...


You WERE one of those people. Remember?

"I don't know science, but acting is one of my passions"

It is my opinion. In this matter I'd like to think my opinion has some weight. Still, I'm curious to see how (if?) Fox respond.

-Gumboot
 
gumboot said:
No I find comments like "the towers came straight down" and "their collapses were identical" to be pretty funny. In fact, I find them to be hilarious.

I laugh at people who can look at an apple and claim it is an orange. Such people are amusing.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

Well at least we're both having fun then cause I find Mark not debunking Craig or Steele pretty funny myself. I kinda laugh at people who sign their screenname at the end of every post even though it's right above their avatar but that's just me.
 
Usual Suspect said:
Well at least we're both having fun then cause I find Mark not debunking Craig or Steele pretty funny myself. I kinda laugh at people who sign their screenname at the end of every post even though it's right above their avatar but that's just me.
Click to expand...


Main thing about life is to have fun.

You're right, it is redundant for me to sign my name at the end. I used to sign my real name. Don't know why I changed.

I'll keep doing this though, as it brings you joy, and that's a good thing.

-Gumboot
 
WildCat said:
Russell, many here are not familiar w/ you and jumped the gun a bit. Tends to happen when 95% of CTers have been far closer to US than you. Hell, you're the only one to date capable of carrying on a debate.

It's not just CTers who have a hard time here either - psychics, homeopaths, bigfoot believers, creationists (and religious types in general), moon landing hoax believers, people who talk to the dead, etc have it just as bad. What we want is evidence - not feelings, or conjecture, or belief. Only evidence works here. And while you're trying, you have a long way to go. Picking one witness out of hundreds who thinks he heard bombs going off, or finding the one engineer among thousands who disagrees w/ the NIST report won't quite cut it. Unless that one person really does have an air-tight case of course.

At any rate, you'd no doubt have a much better time here if it wasn't for the likes of US and Jessica spamming what could be interesting threads w/ their trollish behavior. Not that getting rid of them would help, 2 more will just pop up in their place...


Anyway, I feel your pain on this thread. I'm going to bed and tomorrow I'm just gonna watch football. [qimg]http://home.mindspring.com/~turniton/COTC/bearbang.gif[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Yes, I'm still waiting for your evidence that the explosions reported by eyewitnesses were in fact caused by "floors collapsing throughout the building prior to the catastrophic global collapse."

I notice you linked the entire NIST report as your source, assuming it was in there, without even reading it, no doubt. I can't find the part that supports your claim, could you cite it please?
 
Usual Suspect said:
Something tells me you like to think that in every matter but that's just me.
Click to expand...


I have a degree in filmmaking (BPSA), and am a professional filmmaker. I have been, for the last six years. My specialisations include cinematography, production, and ADing.

I am familar with a wide range of media formats including 8mm, 16mm, S16mm, 35mm, MiniDV, HD, DV, Beta SP, DigiBeta, DVC-PRO, Genesis, and so forth.

I have also been acting since I was a child. I grew up surrounded by actors. As an AD I work directly with actors on a daily basis.

In this matter I feel my opinion is useful. In many other areas I find my knowledge is pitiful, and I usually just watch from the sidelines and try learn (this can be hard! Poke you're head into the AA77 FDR thread some time! :confused: )

-Gumboot
 
gumboot said:
Main thing about life is to have fun.

You're right, it is redundant for me to sign my name at the end. I used to sign my real name. Don't know why I changed.

I'll keep doing this though, as it brings you joy, and that's a good thing.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

Honestly and not in a bad way..... does make you unique and that's never a bad thing.
 
WildCat said:
Russell, many here are not familiar w/ you and jumped the gun a bit. Tends to happen when 95% of CTers have been far closer to US than you. Hell, you're the only one to date capable of carrying on a debate.

It's not just CTers who have a hard time here either - psychics, homeopaths, bigfoot believers, creationists (and religious types in general), moon landing hoax believers, people who talk to the dead, etc have it just as bad. What we want is evidence - not feelings, or conjecture, or belief. Only evidence works here. And while you're trying, you have a long way to go. Picking one witness out of hundreds who thinks he heard bombs going off, or finding the one engineer among thousands who disagrees w/ the NIST report won't quite cut it. Unless that one person really does have an air-tight case of course.

At any rate, you'd no doubt have a much better time here if it wasn't for the likes of US and Jessica spamming what could be interesting threads w/ their trollish behavior. Not that getting rid of them would help, 2 more will just pop up in their place...


Anyway, I feel your pain on this thread. I'm going to bed and tomorrow I'm just gonna watch football. http://home.mindspring.com/~turniton/COTC/bearbang.gif
Click to expand...

I like this Wkipedia article on evidence.

"The most immediate form of evidence available to an individual is the observations of that person's own senses."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom