Usual Suspect
Unregistered
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 228
All I hear is opinions from these ex-CIA or ex-government officials.
Of course that's all you hear MarkyX or is that GravyX??
All I hear is opinions from these ex-CIA or ex-government officials.
All I hear is opinions from these ex-CIA or ex-government officials.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2048876&postcount=619They are very informed opinions though surely.
They are very informed opinions though surely.
They are very informed opinions though surely.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2048876&postcount=619
what do you think about this
Care to name the other?If they weren't someone as smart as Gravy would have debunked them already. This isn't the first time he's been asked about Steele.
As far as i'm aware Steele was a CIA case officer, he founded some kind of intelligence institute, and since 9/11 has reviewed in a professional capacity every book on the 9/11 attacks. Are we meant to disregard his opinion in favour of some posters on a critical thinking forum?
As far as i'm aware Steele was a CIA case officer, he founded some kind of intelligence institute, and since 9/11 has reviewed in a professional capacity every book on the 9/11 attacks. Are we meant to disregard his opinion in favour of some posters on a critical thinking forum?
I assume you're purchasing the rights to the footage with the audio in synch...unless it's out there in that form already.This thread is getting boring and repetitive. Im just holing out for a reply from Fox about the video.
Care to name the other?
Care to present your case about Steele, which we've repeatedly asked you to do, as this is a discussion forum?
Care to tell us about your correspondence with Craig Bartmer?
Care to tell us who made the statement about the NYPD made you start this thread?
Or will you be doing none of those things, because you're a liar who isn't able to make a coherent case, backed with evidence, for what he believes?
I assume you're purchasing the rights to the footage with the audio in synch...unless it's out there in that form already.
Well??
So now you have all this evidence could you guys tell us what you think happened on 911?
In a few short sentences. I will give you an example.
19 guys funded through Al Quada hijacked four planes. Three of them hit buildings. Two burnt and fell down. One hit the Pentagon. The forth crashed after the passengers staged a fight back. NIST have produced a report into the collapse of the towers that is accepted by the vast majority of the scientific community. At the moment they are investigating why WTC 7 collapsed.
OK over to you.
I'll start you off.
"Some time before 911............... (please enter sentences)...........................so 911 is an inside job"
(Ps, no nitpicking of my sentences just enter your own)
Free my mind and tell me what happened, no excuses, no fall back on “we’re just asking question”. No more “that’s for the USG to tell us”.
YOU are the accusers of US citizens of being involved in mass murder of their fellow countrymen, time to put up. Tell us what happened.
Well?
You mean, "I can't. I lied."He was banned. Don't play stupid, it is unbecoming like you told Russ
As soon as you tell us what you think is important, and why, we can have a discussion. You've been told this repeatedly. Why won't you do it? We don't even know if you understand anything about the material you linked to. You'll need to give us a reason to spend time on it. Proceed.My case about Steele is in the links I was excused of dumping and your Gravy research will bring up more. Will CIA be debunked by a Tour Guide??
No, he's NYPD, and you still haven't answered my question. How do you know how he feels about me? When can we expect a summary of your correspondence with him?He's NYFD and I posted his video to show he doesn't feel disrespected by those who ask for truth he feels desrespected by those like JREFers.
You mean the guys who you can't prove exist? Remember, I told you that you shouldn't present unverifiable anecdotes like that as fact, and you agreed and apologized? Shall I post that PM also?Kinda like the two NYFD I brought up that I talked to in Central Park but they were saying they're being lied to cause disgruntled. All three are disrespected by people like you. Not by truthseekers but to acknowledge that would be to own up to be wrong.
You mean, "I can't. I lied."
As soon as you tell us what you think is important, and why, we can have a discussion. You've been told this repeatedly. Why won't you do it? We don't even know if you understand anything about the material you linked to. You'll need to give us a reason to spend time on it. Proceed.
No, he's NYPD, and you still haven't answered my question. How do you know how he feels about me? When can we expect a summary of your correspondence with him?
You mean the guys who you can't prove exist? Remember, I told you that you shouldn't present unverifiable anecdotes like that as fact, and you agreed and apologized? Shall I post that PM also?
As far as i'm aware Steele was a CIA case officer, he founded some kind of intelligence institute, and since 9/11 has reviewed in a professional capacity every book on the 9/11 attacks. Are we meant to disregard his opinion in favour of some posters on a critical thinking forum?