Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

No, you used the man in that video to support your contention that there were explosions in WTC 1 and/or 2
Click to expand...

Are you arguing that there was no explosions in the towers? What are all your friends here talking about generators and hairspray doing then?

It's not "my contention" that there were explosions in the tower, its a well known fact. The witness statement was merely a testament to the size of some of the larger explosions.

I felt it should be included to demonstrate that hairspray and pop, indeed, would not have enough force.
 
Last edited:
Dazed said:
Please provide evidence that he was in WTC3.
This is a completely unfounded assertion.
Click to expand...
You provided the video. Why don't you post the full version? Funny how all the context has been edited out, isn't it?
 
Yes, I sat down and edited out the context so you wouldn't know he was from building 3!

Look, what is your point here? What are you trying to prove? That he wasn't in the towers? Does that prove there was no explosions in the towers?
 
Quote mining alert. Sue Keane's quote comes from a book, Women at Ground Zero: Stories of Courage and Compassion . A review of the book gives some information the CTs will not quote:

"My survivor guilt is astronomical" (p. 64).
She had "made it up as far as the sixth floor" in
To wer One before turning around and heading
back down the stairs (p. 64). She did not have
"bunker gear, and the jet fumes and the smell of the
fuel were too much. The water running down the
stairs was black" (p. 64). When she got down as far
as the mezzanine, "the windows blew in,
ev erything went black, and we all got thrown. In
the military, they blow things up around you so
you’re not afraid of it. You don’t panic" (p. 65).
Click to expand...
www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=171611095942378

No mention of the other quote, but one would need to read the book to assess her testimony, rather than selective quotes from a CT site.
 
Let me say just once more, all I wanted to do was throw in my 2 cents and say that Hawk One's explanation was not satisfactory.

You took it upon yourself to step and say "I have no doubt that some floors collapsed prior to the global collapse."

This intrigued me, because I would like to know your source or reasoning, but when asked for it you go off on a tangent about how there's something shady about the witness statement which is completely irrelevent, unless your argument is:

"the explosions weren't that big and could have been caused by hairspray."

Is that your argument?

Because you're argument seemed to be "The large explosions were actually floors collapsing."
 
Last edited:
Dazed said:
Yes, I sat down and edited out the context so you wouldn't know he was from building 3!

Look, what is your point here? What are you trying to prove? That he wasn't in the towers? Does that prove there was no explosions in the towers?
Click to expand...
It does manage to prove that you're talking out of your ass. :D

Sorry, I couldn't resist.
 
Dazed said:
Let me say just once more, all I wanted to do was throw in my 2 cents and say that Hawk One's explanation was not satisfactory.
Click to expand...
And your evidence that his explanation is unsatisfactory is...?

Please note that using a video you just admitted may not even show a WTC 1 or 2 survivor will be used as evidence of you talking out of your ass.
 
I'm not though, you just don't understand what's going on.

My argument was this.

"Some of the explosions were too large to be caused by hairspray" and cited a witness who was "blown back" by an explosion

Does that seem unreasonable?

That witness became completely irrelevent to the next discussion, that being, did collapsing floors cause the larger explosions?

You did completely ignore the second witness too, who was definitely in the towers. The one sleahead elaborated on there.
 
Russell, Off topic I thought you might find some of this useful
http://undicisettembre.blogspot.com/

Babelfish will translate some of it.
They have some very interesting stuff. They even suggest that you might be able to make out the tail on that second video. (I think we both knew the white wasn't the nose cone.) I haven't read it all yet.
 
Last edited:
What I'm curious about now is, wildcat, why these pre-global-collapse floor-collapses did not trigger the pancaking global collapse?

Take your time, I'm going to the movies now, I'll read it tonight.
 
Kent1 said:
Russell, Off topic I thought you might find some of this useful
http://undicisettembre.blogspot.com/

Babelfish will translate some of it.
They have some very interesting stuff. They even suggest that you might be able to make out the tail on that second video. (I think we both knew the white wasn't the nose cone.) I haven't read it all yet.
Click to expand...

looks like they calculate altitude, what do they call the altitude as the shadow enters the frame
 
Dazed said:
I'm not though, you just don't understand what's going on.

My argument was this.

"Some of the explosions were too large to be caused by hairspray" and cited a witness who was "blown back" by an explosion

Does that seem unreasonable?
Click to expand...
It does if the person quoted wasn't even in WTC1 or 2. I'm sure if we could find out the name of the firefighter...
 
Usual Suspect said:
It's refuting that it isn't his own work.
Click to expand...
lol, do you even know the definition of refute?

and the fact that it isnt 100% his own work doesnt make it false, hate to tell you, but "refuting" it will actually require some effort on your part
 
Usual Suspect said:
Of course it does. But you know this because you've heard it many times before.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
you know the idea of making everyone learn and do everything little thing for themselves rather defeats the purpose of civilization, dont you think?

so did you design, manfacture, assemble and program the computer you are using to access this forum?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom