Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

OK Russell, now answer me these simple questions please:

1)Why would the USG demolish WTC7?

2)Why would terrorists demolish WTC7?
 
jessicarabbit said:
It has been proved that government conspiracies do exist. Just look at the Luther King trial in 1999. The jury found that elements of government had conspired to kill King and that James Earl Ray was an unwitting accomplice.
Click to expand...

Nobody wants to acknowledge the above fact hmm...
 
* Ahem *

You fellows are all so enamoured with conjecture, surely you can answer this for me:

R.Mackey said:
Consider the following simple points:

1. The FDNY wouldn't let anyone near WTC 7 after, oh, say 2 PM or thereabouts, because they were afraid of collapse.

2. WTC 7 collapsed about 5:30 PM. The precise time is not important.

So, if WTC 7 collapsing is such a bloomin' surprise, then how did the FDNY know about it? Pick one:

(a) FDNY blew it up

(b) FDNY was told by _____ that it was going to be blown up

(c) Lucky guess

(d) It wasn't so hard to predict that WTC 7 was coming down after all, and all this talk about how it "must have been 'splosives" is armchair speculation of people who don't know what the heck they're talking about

Please explain your answer. Thanks.
Click to expand...
 
Russell Pickering said:
12. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? The combination of thermite and sulfur (called thermate) "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter."

NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Click to expand...

Dr Thermite Jones has infected you!

Thermite you mean iron rust and Al was found at the WTC???? How can that be?

THERMATE, Sulfur was found too? Not sure how tons of sulfur could have been at the world trade center.

Thermite works in the vertical, try again.

Iron rust and aluminum, and sulfur oh my
 
Here I made it easy for you.......

9/11 Mysteries

Watch the interview with the "Regular Joe". He spits the official story like he's been reading it for days. This guy gives the official story before it even was the official story.
 
R.Mackey said:
Consider the following simple points:

1. The FDNY wouldn't let anyone near WTC 7 after, oh, say 2 PM or thereabouts, because they were afraid of collapse.

2. WTC 7 collapsed about 5:30 PM. The precise time is not important.

So, if WTC 7 collapsing is such a bloomin' surprise, then how did the FDNY know about it? Pick one:

(a) FDNY blew it up

(b) FDNY was told by _____ that it was going to be blown up

(c) Lucky guess

(d) It wasn't so hard to predict that WTC 7 was coming down after all, and all this talk about how it "must have been 'splosives" is armchair speculation of people who don't know what the heck they're talking about

Please explain your answer. Thanks.
Click to expand...

If the FDNY knew it would collapse how can the collapse mechanism remain unexplained
 
Russell Pickering said:
12. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? The combination of thermite and sulfur (called thermate) "slices through steel like a hot knife through butter."

NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.

http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
Click to expand...

Thanks for the residue quote.
 
jessicarabbit said:
If the FDNY knew it would collapse how can the collapse mechanism remain unexplained
Click to expand...

That's not an answer... it's a question, I think, though I can't quite make out what you are saying.

Are you saying FDNY did not know it would collapse? Because that is provably false. My two facts above are absolutely unchallengeable, and that's all I need to prove my point.
 
R.Mackey said:
That's not an answer... it's a question, I think, though I can't quite make out what you are saying.

Are you saying FDNY did not know it would collapse? Because that is provably false. My two facts above are absolutely unchallengeable, and that's all I need to prove my point.
Click to expand...

Please answer the question then. What information led to the FDNY thinking it would collapse when even the experts still dont know why it collapsed and no skyscraper before that day had collapsed?
 
jessicarabbit said:
Please answer the question then. What information led to the FDNY thinking it would collapse when even the experts still dont know why it collapsed and no skyscraper before that day had collapsed?
Click to expand...

Irrelevant. All that matters is that they did. They evacuated the area hours before it fell. (I do know the answer, by the way -- it was on fire, could not be fought, and was visibly leaning. This has been widely published in interviews, I have found it before and can again, and so can you.)

So you say it was a lucky guess? Is that your answer?

Why is it so hard to answer my very, very simple question?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom