Randi - You've Been Had! TS1234 Email to Randi

defaultdotxbe said:
When two objects collide, one of three things can happen:

1. A remains intact and destroys B
2. B remains intact and destroys A
3. Something between these two extremes.
Click to expand...

you forgot 4. Both A and B are destroyed

this often happens when A and B are of similar size, weight, and strength, such as the 85th and the 84th floors of the WTC
Click to expand...

And 5. - they are both undamaged, like pool / snooker balls.
 
When two objects collide, one of three things can happen:

1. A remains intact and destroys B
2. B remains intact and destroys A
3. Something between these two extremes.
Click to expand...
Exactly right. I remember reading reports of when Billy Joel would drive into houses, he would simply throw his car into reverse and move on to the next one.
 
Pardalis said:
TS, get ready to get your ass spanked.
Click to expand...

By which I must guess you mean the little......gentleman........is going to have his entire body hit on - since he is a donkey entire, , a buttock complete , an a whole.
 
What about "B gets destroyed while partially destroying A, then the rubble from B and the partial A fall upon the remainder of A, destroying it as well"?

So is this what BS1234's argument boils down to? This one misunderstanding of physics?

And I'll put in my application for the JREF million with this prediction: BS1234 will receive a terse, gruff response from Randi.
 
CurtC said:
What about "B gets destroyed while partially destroying A, then the rubble from B and the partial A fall upon the remainder of A, destroying it as well"?

So is this what BS1234's argument boils down to? This one misunderstanding of physics?

And I'll put in my application for the JREF million with this prediction: BS1234 will receive a terse, gruff response from Randi.
Click to expand...
My bet is on Randi ignoring his punk arse.

DR
 
Darth Rotor said:
My bet is on Randi ignoring his punk arse.

DR
Click to expand...

That would be my guess as well. Randi, I'm willing to put money on, probably, gets many e-mails that are roughly along the same lines as TS's (on varying subjects) and he actually has a life. If he does respond, it will probably be along the lines of the Chomskey letter.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
In reality, the top parts of the buildings were shattered before they ever started falling down through the lower structure, as all the photos and videos reveal. Look at the video of WTC1. The top part of the building compresses to half its size before the lower part ever moves one inch. By the time the "collapse" is half-over, the top of the building has completely disintegrated. Look closely Mr. Randi, the illusionists used a lot of smoke.
Click to expand...


Er...um...OK then..nod, nod (Simon smiles politely and backs away very slowly).
 
Hutch said:
Having met Mr. Randi in person (as has CF Larsen), he is aware of what goes on at the Forums in a general way, but only posts on major topics or to give his view on how the board should be operating. The man does not have the time to spend hours here like we do.

That said, I am sure he is aware of the Conspiracy sub-forum and the 9-11 discussions here. As mentioned above, Mr. Randi is not an engineer or a demolitions expert, but I imagine he knows a few to ask questions of.

Considering that his right-hand lady (Linda) just had an emergency appendectomy and he is about 10 months recovered from heart surgery, I would not expect a quick reply to TS missive. Which he will undoubltedly use
as "evidence".

One last thing; Mr. Randi can be among the funniest and most charming people you can ever meet; but he does not suffer fools gladly. If TS gets his answer, he probably will not enjoy it.
Click to expand...

Most celebrities get thier share of fan mail from whack-jobs. Wich they usually toss out (or have thier people toss out for them) unless it appeals to thier own prefferred whack-jobbery (you should've sent this to Charlie Sheen, TS$1.98). Mr. Randi, because of his specific focus and carreer (and that 1,000,000$) probably gets a thousand times the amount of crank-mail that other celebs get.

My guess is, he'll probably circular file TS$1.98's letter after the first two paragraphs.
 
The idea of writing to Randi was brought up by other members, Gravy in particular, if I remember right. They challenged me to do it, and posted his email address several times.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Taking my lesson from you, I learned that whenever something appears to violate the laws of physics, it must be a trick. The so-called "official" explanation of 9/11 asks us to believe something physically impossible.

<snip>

Having a falling mass pulverize macroscopic objects below into powder positively requires that the falling mass encounters stout resistance. Whatever is in between the falling mass and the stout resistance can be pulverized. If the falling mass does not encounter stout resistance, impacted mass will not pulverize. A hammer requires an anvil. A mortar requires a pestle.
Click to expand...

Excellent compilation of obvious logic. The fact that the opposition does not quote you often shows that your reasoning cannot be defeated.

Personally I think they are convinced. They know it was a demolition but cannot bring themselves to oppose the parental figures of government. Without them they would have nothing, no guidence to the future.

Controlled by fear there is no ability to communicate with their fellow country person to establish priorities of needs relating to; rights, freedoms and justice, so must support illogical nonsense to fend off the fearful darkness of the unkown.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom