• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

william rodriguez

The fact that he even described it was like moving furniture says nothing to you? How can that come from an explosion?

But earlier you claimed it was an explosion, a fuel/air explosion. How can a wall being destroyed by fuel air explosions sound like moving furniture?

You just disproved your own argument!
 
who needs an explosion? The impact of two very heavy objects can create rubble easily. Every watch someone demo a building with that big ball tied to a crane? (dang what is that thing called?)

Yeah but we are talking about the "large" 400 pound presses that were destroyed before collapse.
 
who needs an explosion? The impact of two very heavy objects can create rubble easily. Every watch someone demo a building with that big ball tied to a crane? (dang what is that thing called?)

So your coming round to my demolition theory.
 
who needs an explosion? The impact of two very heavy objects can create rubble easily. Every watch someone demo a building with that big ball tied to a crane? (dang what is that thing called?)

Big ball, tied to a crane.

I think it's called an (ACME) demolition ball.
 
But earlier you claimed it was an explosion, a fuel/air explosion. How can a wall being destroyed by fuel air explosions sound like moving furniture?

You just disproved your own argument!

Two completely different scenarios pal. The moving furniture part was when the plane hit.
 
I'm not here to repeat myself. I've done my homework. If you don't want to read all the eyewitness accounts that I compiled, the burden of ignorance is on you.

P.s. you might want to look into what the elevator shaft walls were made of.

Well that says it all boss.
 
So your coming round to my demolition theory.

Wait, so you are saying that the Bush administration hit the twin towers with huge cranes without anyone noticing?

There's a new one.
 
Now, where have I seen those replies before? Mmm...
Killtown, that you?

Naw, Docker is an LC reject, or quitter! Depending on the spin you subscribe to!

ETA: Could be though! Game on later!
GO COWBOYS!
 
Last edited:
Wait, so you are saying that the Bush administration hit the twin towers with huge cranes without anyone noticing?

There's a new one.

Dont be ridiculous. We all know it was laser guided v2 rockets, stolen from russia, launch by the international space station, and cloaked by holograms provided by david copperfield.
 
Naw, Docker is an LC reject, or quitter! Depending on the spin you subscribe to!

ETA: Could be though!

Quitter then. LC doesn't seem to reject members since the new (and brainhurting) forum. At least that gives Shrinker some well deserved rest.
 
But u admitted a fuel/air explosion. So to then say they didnt hear explosions defeats your case.

That could have occured when during when the planes hit, during the rumbling.

Honestly, I don't know where you are going with this, because you have not yet proved that there were explosive except for some presses that were destroyed (which I already told you must have come from fuel explosions)

Oh and a fuel explosion probably wouldn't sound the same as a bomb going off, am I correct?
 
Naw, Docker is an LC reject, or quitter! Depending on the spin you subscribe to!

ETA: Could be though! Game on later!
GO COWBOYS!

I am not killtown, although I admire his voracity. I dont use or care about loose change forums either.
 
Dont be ridiculous. We all know it was laser guided v2 rockets, stolen from russia, launch by the international space station, and cloaked by holograms provided by david copperfield.

I allmost thought you were being sarcastic.
 
But u admitted a fuel/air explosion. So to then say they didnt hear explosions defeats your case.


Not really. We're only talking about the FIRST explosion he claimed to hear. There was also the SECOND explosion, after which he went to the elevator doors and saw them damaged, with white smoke, smell of kerosene, burned people, etc...

We contend this SECOND explosion was caused by the jet fuel.

-Gumboot
 
That could have occured when during when the planes hit, during the rumbling.

Honestly, I don't know where you are going with this, because you have not yet proved that there were explosive except for some presses that were destroyed (which I already told you must have come from fuel explosions)

Oh and a fuel explosion probably wouldn't sound the same as a bomb going off, am I correct?

I have challenged you to explain the rubble and you have not. I asked for an example of fuel causing such damage, none were provided (except a pathetically waek link to bombs on wikipedia)

By the way, using the word "during" twice in one sentence shows the knots I have tied you in.
 
Not really. We're only talking about the FIRST explosion he claimed to hear. There was also the SECOND explosion, after which he went to the elevator doors and saw them damaged, with white smoke, smell of kerosene, burned people, etc...

We contend this SECOND explosion was caused by the jet fuel.

-Gumboot

Show me an example of fuel causing that damage or withdraw your contention.
 
I might have heard negative things about gravy before joining here but at least gravy does some research and provides evidence. The rest of you don't bother and just rely on him.
 

Back
Top Bottom