Star Wars Beam Weapon and the WTC Bathtub

Killtown said:
Question for you skeptics, do you think the U.S. military current possess secret weapons?

Note that I'm not saying I necessarily agree with the Woods and Reynolds about their new theory, just want to know skeptic's opinions on secret weapons.
Click to expand...

Here's a hint, Killtown. Nobody gives a flying **** what you think because you have proven that you are incapable of rational thought.

Your nonsensical posts are occasionally remotely amusing, though.

So, carry on.
 
Last edited:
LashL said:
Here's a hint, Killtown. Nobody gives a flying **** what you think because you have proven that you are incapable of rational thought.

Your nonsensical posts are occasionally remotely amusing, though.

So, carry on.
Click to expand...
Too much of the coward to answer the easy yes/no question?
 
Killtown said:
Question for you skeptics, do you think the U.S. military current possess secret weapons?

Note that I'm not saying I necessarily agree with the Woods and Reynolds about their new theory, just want to know skeptic's opinions on secret weapons.
Click to expand...

Depends on what you mean with secret weapons. I am sure there's weapons research being done that (wooa! Imagine that!) is not revealed to the general public.

That does in no way validate the idea that this

death-star-1.jpg


destroyed this

HG_Twin_Towers.jpg


mkay?
 
Killtown said:
Question for you skeptics, do you think the U.S. military current possess secret weapons?

Note that I'm not saying I necessarily agree with the Woods and Reynolds about their new theory, just want to know skeptic's opinions on secret weapons.
Click to expand...
classified weapons? yes

superlasers? no

ETA: heres a recently declassified "black project"
picture.jpg

pretty dull looking next to aurora, eh?
 
Last edited:
Killtown said:
Too much of the coward to answer the easy yes/no question?
Click to expand...

Huh? You haven't asked me any questions, and I'm not a mind reader, so I've no idea what the (rule 8) you're blathering about.
 
Mkay, so I take it most JREFers think the U.S. military does possess secret weapons.

Now hypothetically speaking, if -- IF -- 9/11 was an inside job, would it be out of the question that the military used any of their secret weapons to help pull it off?
 
Killtown said:
Now hypothetically speaking, if -- IF -- 9/11 was an inside job, would it be out of the question that the military used any of their secret weapons to help pull it off?
Click to expand...
yes, i think it would be out of the question, they wouldnt risk exposing secret projects for something as simple as crashing a plane into the towers

BTW heres 2 more black aircraft
X-32_X-35_Cdp_misc_004.jpg
 
Killtown said:
Mkay, so I take it most JREFers think the U.S. military does possess secret weapons.

Now hypothetically speaking, if -- IF -- 9/11 was an inside job, would it be out of the question that the military used any of their secret weapons to help pull it off?
Click to expand...

Since 99% or more of the engineering community believes that a 767 impact is more than sufficient to cause the collapse of the WTC towers, my answer would be no. Why risk a multi-billion dollar prototype when all you need to do is rig a remote control civillian airliner?

Or better yet, tell a bunch of horny arabs they'll get laid 72 times if they steal a plane and smash it into the WTC.
 
Last edited:
Killtown, you must be either completely delusional or an utter moron.

From:

Huh? You haven't asked me any questions, and I'm not a mind reader, so I've no idea what the (rule 8) you're blathering about
Click to expand...
.

You conclude this:

UMkay, so I take it most JREFers think the U.S. military does possess secret weapons.
Click to expand...

That's just sheer lunacy, I'm afraid.

I've no idea how you can possibly get from "I don't know what the hell you're talking about (because your prior posts are independently delusional all on their own, by the way)" to "most JREFers think X"

unless you are truly, completely, and utterly nuts or, alternatively, a complete moron.

I'm guessing the latter but I'm not ruling out the former.
 
Last edited:
LashL said:
Killtown, you must be either completely delusional or an utter moron.

From:

.

You come to this:



That's just sheer lunacy, I'm afraid.

I've no idea how you can possibly get from "I don't know what the hell you're talking about (because your Killtown prior posts are independently delusional)" to "most JREFers think X"

unless you are truly, completely, and utterly nuts or, alternatively, a complete moron.

I'm guessing the latter but I'm not ruling out the former.
Click to expand...
hes basing it on his completely representative sample size of 3, lol
 
defaultdotxbe said:
hes basing it on his completely representative sample size of 3, lol
Click to expand...

Well, 3's a prime, hence it's obviously prime evidence and a good sample size.

Then there's the whole 911, I mean 9 is 3*3, double prime plus good, and 11's a prime too! What more do you need?
 
72 virgins and 2 weeks of flight training.

Add the 7 and 2 together and split the other 2 in half and you get 9 1 1.

It really was the muslim nutjobs after all!

Well, hey I guess that's over, ain't it?
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
72 virgins and 2 weeks of flight training.

Add the 7 and 2 together and split the other 2 in half and you get 9 1 1.

It really was the muslim nutjobs after all!

Well, hey I guess that's over, ain't it?
Click to expand...

So you mean my 10 yr worth of baked beans and bottled water is useless? That I built my underground shelter to protect me when the NWO is implemeted in vain? I do not really need to wear my tin-foil hat at work?

Crap.

But I still need my rebreather to protect against chemtrails though, right?
 
asmodean said:
So you mean my 10 yr worth of baked beans and bottled water is useless? That I built my underground shelter to protect me when the NWO is implemeted in vain? I do not really need to wear my tin-foil hat at work?

Crap.

But I still need my rebreather to protect against chemtrails though, right?
Click to expand...

Actually, I'd make sure your bomb shelter has a good lock and electrified door knobs. When the twoofers help Osama and Mahmoud Immadinnerjacket take over and find themselves added to the extermination orders despite thier help, they're prolly gonna try to break in on you.

Screw those looney bastards, let them lie in the beds they made.
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
Actually, I'd make sure your bomb shelter has a good lock and electrified door knobs. When the twoofers help Osama and Mahmoud Immadinnerjacket take over and find themselves added to the extermination orders despite thier help, they're prolly gonna try to break in on you.

Screw those looney bastards, let them lie in the beds they made.
Click to expand...

Hmm, got a better idea. I'll booby trap the entrance and try to lure the troofers in. I mean, they come pre-packed in tinfoil, just throw them on the barbie and enjoy a good meal. May have to switch to fava beans for that tho'. In any case it'll be an excellent opportunity to practice new culinary disciplines for when our reptoid overlords take over openly.
 
bjb said:
<snip>
The point of my long story is that cars don't catch on fire and explode like you see on TV. <snip>
Click to expand...

People are too conditioned by TV etc. with respect to car fires.

Fuel tank explosions are VERY unusual. The contents of the fuel tank may catch fire, and if they do they will burn vigorously, but they rarely explode.

Things that can explode on a car include the tyres (due to the compressed air in them being released when the tyre is weakened by the fire) the shock absobers, and the pneumatic stays on the boot (trunk?) and bonnet (hood?). Note - these cause explosions without explosives.

My former colleagues removed some of these items before setting fire to cars (to measure the heat output from the fires).

Dave
 
Crazycowbob said:
"Drs. Wood and Reynolds complete their thesis in public view. They note that the Kingdome demolition created a 2.3 richter earthquake, and point out that WTC had many times the PE, and should have caused a much larger earthquake than the 2.3, and 2.1 quakes that were actually measured."

This actually makes sense, and goes against the controlled demolition theory. In controlled demolition, the bottom support would have been taken out, and the entire building would have dropped, hitting the ground with it's full weight in a very short amount of time (I'm just guessing here, but I'd say roughly the time for the building to drop one story). This would have created a much larger impact to register. As was mentioned earlier, the Ricter scale is a measure of peak vibration. The measurements you've presented here would appear to be reasonably consistent with the buildings collapsing from the top down, where the destruction was spread over a relatively long period of time, with no real "impacts" other than when the top floors first collapsed.

An analogy: Drop 20 gallons of water on your head and you'll be knocked flat on your back, pour 20 gallons of water on your head over ~5 seconds, you're just going to get wet.

If I get the time, I'll work out the physics of it and post it so you can work it out for yourself. After all, you shouldn't just take my word for it!




Long live the DNRC!
Click to expand...
Welcome, Crazycowbob! :w2:
Nice introduction.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom