• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Thought id say hello

time for me to leave i think. I was totally right in my prediction. my offer still stands of a real debate with one of u

your prediction of what? I have been nothing but civil and interested to hear you further explain your position. Why not follow through with your post and discuss these things with me?
 
the 911 report described the core as a hollow steel shaft. i dont know what did that to the beams thats why im asking. I didnt expect them to fall at any speed because I didnt expect them to fall atall but in a progressive collapse with resistance from lower floors i would have expected something different from what i saw. see? u have started already by claiming that you doubt i will be happy. If everything is explained i will be


what would you have expected, and on what basis? have you consulted any experts?
 
i shall be addressing no one, i am unsubscribing from the site. This is not a debate, its pointless

just as i said, 20 of u one of me
 
how can i possibly answer so many people at once, its ridiculous.

Well take the posts one at a time, and use the "quote" button at the bottom of the post you are responding to. This isn't a real time chat, you can take your time to respond.
 
PD:

jumping out so soon. Come on. These guys read the SLC Blog, they know who you are and the shaite you've been causing over there. Give them a little slack, I mean what was said wasnt much...I say start your thread and see what happens.

TAM
 
Before you claim I have taken my opinions from loose change let me state categorically that I think its an awful film that is at least 80% incorrect
Hello.

1) Please name a correct claim in Loose Change.

2) You posted in the SLC forum that I (Mark Roberts) was apparently afraid to debate the likes of David Ray Griffin. Why did you say that? To my knowledge, you and I have never spoken.
 
could one of u clowns explain how one man is meant to debate 20 people simultaneously, im clever but not that clever

oh gravy u want one true claim in Loose Change? they claim the music was written by dj skooly, as far as i know thats true

loose change is utter crap
 
ok gravy just me and

1 of me and one of u

its physically impossible for me to debate 20 people, although i would destroy each of u one by one
 
could one of u clowns explain how one man is meant to debate 20 people simultaneously, im clever but not that clever

oh gravy u want one true claim in Loose Change? they claim the music was written by dj skooly, as far as i know thats true

loose change is utter crap

I believe I have explained this.

But once more, with feeling:

Well take the posts one at a time, and use the "quote" button at the bottom of the post you are responding to. This isn't a real time chat, you can take your time to respond.

And, for the record, none of us have been insulting. You opened that door. Shall we start over now?
 
could one of u clowns explain how one man is meant to debate 20 people simultaneously, im clever but not that clever

oh gravy u want one true claim in Loose Change? they claim the music was written by dj skooly, as far as i know thats true

loose change is utter crap

Actually...sorry, but the intro music, when we see the statue of liberty, is borrowed from a movie made in 1966, and was later featured (legally) in Kill Bill Vol 2.

I couldnt let that one slide, but it is a nitpick.
That said, I agree that if you want a one on one debate, you should have one. Simply start a thread, and ask that noone other than you and the first person who wants to debate your topic with you post. We can be very respectful of this request.

TAM
 
fowlsound i cant debate 20 people with or without ur magic quote button

one at a time or its pointless

oh and a question for u all: if im so insignificant and a deranged troofer why is there such a clamour to debate me?
 
ok gravy just me and

1 of me and one of u

its physically impossible for me to debate 20 people, although i would destroy each of u one by one


Fine, everyone except gravy clam up. When pdoherty is done "destroying" gravy, we can draw straws or something to see who is next in line to be "destroyed".
 
the 911 report described the core as a hollow steel shaft. i dont know what did that to the beams thats why im asking.

The beams and structure are spaced around and in the core. But the core is by no means 'filled in' with anything else. The elevators are in there, but I'd say even with them in place the core is still pretty hollow. There does not appear to be any denial of the beams in that description. What is wrong with it?

I didnt expect them to fall at any speed because I didnt expect them to fall atall but in a progressive collapse with resistance from lower floors i would have expected something different from what i saw. see?

Well, the 'block' in one of the towers had a considerablely large amount of potential energy. I forget the calculation, but is was on the order of 8,000 mjoules (note, this is probably not the figure not correct, buyt I can;'t find the source at this moment). That is not enough for the remaining structure to stop once it gets moving.

u have started already by claiming that you doubt i will be happy. If everything is explained i will be

OK. Fair enough.
 
The unusual beams found curved into a semi circle with no buckling or cracks.
since you dodged my question a few times at SLC ill ask here

how do explosives bend a column into a "perfect semicircle with no buckling or cracks"

keep in mind the lack of buckling would indicate it was bent slowly, explosives tend to do wthings rather quickly
 
fowlsound i cant debate 20 people with or without ur magic quote button

one at a time or its pointless

oh and a question for u all: if im so insignificant and a deranged troofer why is there such a clamour to debate me?

Ok. Debate gravy then.

For the record, every post to this point that was insulting was yours. Thats not much of a "debate" style.
 

Back
Top Bottom