Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry going back, 42 was the right answer in HHGTTG - it was the question that was wrong, because the Earth was demolished (CD? :D ) to make way for a hyper-soace bypass. Mind you, it is apt because CTers keep asking the wrong questions...
 
Christophera said:
The term "masonry" referres to actual stone not concrete.
Click to expand...

this right here shows why you do not know what the hell you are talking about and should refrain from further commenting on an industry you have never participated in:

Masonry is the building of structures from individual units laid in and bound together by mortar. The common materials of masonry construction are brick, stone such as marble, granite, travertine, limestone; concrete block, glass block, and tile. Masonry is generally a highly durable form of construction. However, the materials used, the quality of the mortar and workmanship, and the pattern the units are laid in can strongly affect the durability of the overall masonry construction.

Masonry:
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0916041.html

Concrete:
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0813170.html
 
Masonry is all the materials listed; stonemasonry is exclusively stonework and is normally used in the industry thus.

Man, he's mental.
 
Christophera said:
Go to the hospital, you have a concussion. Then to the mental ward, you have a probem.


The floor plan says it is for WTC 2 and you have annotated WTC 1

The plan is garbage. Fraud.

Here is the best info that can be found on the basic structure of the towers which had steel reinforced, tubular cast concrete cores.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html
Click to expand...
Did you see the other post?
The floor plan works for both buildings. What is your proof that both buildings have different floor plans?
 
uruk said:
Did you see the other post?
The floor plan works for both buildings. What is your proof that both buildings have different floor plans?
Click to expand...
They are the TWIN towers. If you have seen 1 floor plan, you see them all.

Anyway I think thread need to be closed or something. Chistoconcret keep trolling this concret core nonsense to death.
 
twinstead said:
And, for the 100,000th time, we submit that the picture is inconclusive. We therefore request some corroborating evidence that it is indeed a concrete core. What part of that do you not understand?
Click to expand...

I understand all of it and have already provided dynamic corroboration. The uniform selectivity I'm faced with is not reasonable. To be reasonable examine the consistency of the web sites description of the concrete core when the core is mentioned. There are mentions of steel on some of those pages but that is just the confusion. The uniformity is the important, real information.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

twinstead said:
Even if you dismiss it all, you can't deny we have shown you literally dozens and dozens of bits of evidence supporting a steel core. Yet, all you do is keep posting that same stupid picture as it it trumps everything. Well, IT DOESN'T.
Click to expand...

By itself perhaps not. With all of the corroboraton of the above link, the inability of anyone to come up with a reasonable explanation for what this is if it not steel becomes basically conclusive. No other core can be substantiated.

twinstead said:
Do you have any other evidence of a concrete core? Specifically during construction, since there's not all the dust concealing everything like in your pictures.

Just one piece of evidence Chris that a concrete core was poured during construction. That's all we ask. Some corroborating evidence to support your theory.
Click to expand...

As I said. The images from construction of the core were not very many to begin with because the thing is being poured inside a 40 foot deep hole 50 to 35 feet from the outer walls. there was rarely enough light. Add to that the removal of images by the perpetrators prior to 9-11 and after it, and the construction photos are just not available.

Again, I have adequately shown that the existing misinterpreted construction images indeed do not show the core columns that FEMA claims existed. The uttter lack of them in the raw evidence of 9-11 simply eliminates the justification for using the construction images that just are not properly presented. Not to mention the fact the plans are hidden and there are 3 different floor plans for the towers, a dead giveaway as to some deception.

The old addage about liars, recall?
 
Last edited:
Huntsman said:
CRAP!

Got a band-aid?
Click to expand...

Band%20Aid%201984.jpg
 
As I said. The images from constrcution of the core were not very many to begin with because the thing is being poured inside a 40 foot deep hole 50 to 35 feet from the outer walls. there was rarely enough light. Add to that teh filtering of images by the perpetrators prior to 9-11 and after it, and the constrcution photos are just not available.
Click to expand...
You are just making stuff up as you go along. Nice. There are literally thousands of photos taken during the construction, and many are very hard to explain if one beleives in a concrete core. We have provided for you many pictures that actually show a steel core being built. Since you claim that there just aren't many pictures, then perhaps to make up for it you need to find ONE, JUST ONE person involved in the construction that supports you. You can’t and you know it.

All you have are excuses and hand waiving. Life must be easy if you can distort reality so it fits into your world view like you do. It's an art, dude. I gotta hand it to your for that.

Again, I have adequately shown that the existing misinterpreted construction images indeed do not show the core columns that FEMA claims existed. The uttter lack of them in the raw evidence of 9-11 simply eleminates the justification for using the construction images that just are not properly presented. Not to mention the fact the plans are hidden and there are 3 differnt floor plans for the towers, a dead giveaway as to some deception.
Click to expand...
No, you have not. You just think you have because otherwise your theory would fall apart. You can't hand waive evidence that contradicts your theory away by claiming the copious evidence presented to you is 'misinterpreted'. I call BS.

The old addage about liars, recall?
Click to expand...
I'll make something up, so it will be, shall we say, a new adage:

"Crazy people don't know they are crazy. According to them, they are right and the world is against them. No amount of logic or evidence, quality of debate, or majority of detractors can dissuade them from their beliefs; they will forever keep repeating the same tired debunked evidence over and over and over and over again."

See. Like it? An instant classic.
 
twinstead said:
You are just making stuff up as you go along. Nice. There are literally thousands of photos taken during the construction, and many are very hard to explain if one beleives in a concrete core.
Click to expand...


Show me one that shows steel core columns at construction or otherwise and I will point out things about your image that reasonably show the image does not show what you think it shows.

Meanwhile, there is no reasonable explanation for this if it is not concrete.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom