....Yes, it is all your fault.
Sue me.
....Yes, it is all your fault.
1.) Assuming that god does not exist then a lot of innocent people have died for nothing.
2.) Assuming that god does indeed exist then a lot of innocent people have died for god.
Why do people need to die in the name of god. I say we stop it.
And they will continue to kill people in the name of god.I think it's important because people will continue to be cognizant of God.
There will always be debate and thought. We don't need people to die for that.In addition to death and wars, it also produces debate and thought, like this.
Gainsaying.And I still reject your "logic".
That does't justify killing innocent people in the name of god.Innocent people die for nothing all the time in events that have nothing to do with God.
Sadly they didn't need to die. No matter how you slice it, innocent people need not die for god. And since there is no proof that there is a god perhaps we should stop killing for god.See my reply to your first profound observation.
I can't do much. I can only show people how utterly senseless it is to murder innocent people in the name of god. I can logically show those who can understand logic that the more people who condemn ALL killing in the name of god the better off we will all be. Sadly this is a rather large presumption on my part.Now. How do you propose to stop it?
Well, I'm very interested to learn that a mind reader is participating here. If you know that I'm "purposefully not trying to understand what RandFan is telling me", then you must also know what I'm thinking at this precise moment.
Can you tell us all what that is?
Yes, it should be clear from post #290 that I haven't comprehended what RandFan is saying. Like I pointed out in post #290, RandFan is conflicting him/her self with the posts cited.
This post is an example of logical reasoning. I understand logic and reasoning as well as the next guy.
What I'm doing is rejecting your logic and reasoning, outlining why, and responding to your continued struggling.
Originally Posted by Huntster
I think it's important because people will continue to be cognizant of God.
And they will continue to kill people in the name of god.
Quote:
In addition to death and wars, it also produces debate and thought, like this.
There will always be debate and thought. We don't need people to die for that.
Quote:
See my reply to your first profound observation.
Sadly they didn't need to die. No matter how you slice it, innocent people need not die for god. And since there is no proof that there is a god perhaps we should stop killing for god.
Quote:
Now. How do you propose to stop it?
I can't do much. I can only show people how utterly senseless it is to murder innocent people in the name of god. I can logically show those who can understand logic that the more people who condemn ALL killing in the name of god the better off we will all be. Sadly this is a rather large presumption on my part.
Originally Posted by Huntster
Well, I'm very interested to learn that a mind reader is participating here. If you know that I'm "purposefully not trying to understand what RandFan is telling me", then you must also know what I'm thinking at this precise moment.
Can you tell us all what that is?
Thanks for proving my point.
Quote:
Yes, it should be clear from post #290 that I haven't comprehended what RandFan is saying. Like I pointed out in post #290, RandFan is conflicting him/her self with the posts cited.
No he's not. That you think he is is evidence of your sub par comprehension.
No surprise really, having sub par cognitive abilities is a prerequisite for someone of your religious devotion. You're demonstrating that stereotype right now.
...That you exhibit this attitude demonstrates that you do not understand logic. Logic is not subjective, there is no such thing (beyond a figure of speech) as "your logic". Logic, by its very nature, is objective and not dependent on a person's perspective.
Wow, what a thread.
Huntster you're doing some good stuff here, tough to put dents in brick walls but points for effort!
-Elliot
Thank you so much, Elliot. I hope you know I always enjoy your posts, and you are much better than I at keeping your patience with those brick walls.
People who commit suicide to kill other people don't do it for wealth and power.They will also continue to kill people for wealth and power, and claim they do it in the name of God.
Agreed 100% That all killing is bad doesn't excuse killing in the name of god though. More importantly, it doesn't make the bible a source of moral instruction.Whoever it is who is killing innocent people should stop doing so, whether they do it in the name of God, or for any other reason.
What reason do you have to believe this is true? I don't think there is any reason to believe this. The problem, as this discussion is concerned, isn't people killing it's people killing for god.Maybe if you drop the "in the name of God" stuff, and focus on showing people how utterly evil it is to kill people PERIOD, you might gain some ground.
?Wow, what a thread.
Huntster you're doing some good stuff here, tough to put dents in brick walls but points for effort!
How about argument? Is this a child's sandbox?Nah, I'm always typing something, and then retyping it with candy-coating. Too concerned with appearance. If you have to try to be engaging, like I do, maybe it isn't worth the effort. I like your direct approach. But enough with the sweet talk.
This is how this all started.I personally find it difficult to look at the bible and come to any reasonable understanding as to what is good and bad. The 10 commandments state "thou shalt not kill" however the Jews did a lot of killing and that includes women and children. Now, perhaps it was justified (I'm not convinced but perhaps). Perhaps god told them to. Ok, so is killing good or bad? It really isn't clear.
People who commit suicide to kill other people don't do it for wealth and power.Originally Posted by Huntster
They will also continue to kill people for wealth and power, and claim they do it in the name of God.
....I like your direct approach....