Truthseeker1234's Education/Degrees/Qualifications?

Sword_Of_Truth

Penultimate Amazing
S
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
11,494
Anyone care to speculate what they are?

I've asked and he won't say. He just keeps droning on about what he claims the laws of physics will allow.

So if he won't cough it up... let's make it up! :D
 
masters degree at least

CLOWN_COLLEGE.jpg
 
If I were to make a serious guess, I'd say he tops out at a G.E.D.

Either that or he graduated from a vocational high school program.
 
I think he said he worked in audio or something? I don't recall what he said exactly... some sort of audio technician?

-Andrew
 
Yes, those droning laws of physics. Like conservation of energy. It's so annoying when trying to convince others of an impossible scenario. Like, a 110 story building crushes itself into shredded steel and fine powder, and ejects the steel up to 600 feel laterally, while the powder forms pyroclastic flows and rapidly expands to more than 3 times the volume of the intact building while remaining clearly defined and exhibiting a tell-tale "cauliflower" shape, a mushroom cloud forms where the building just was, giving the whole thing a distinct resemblance to a volacano, and when it's over, there is nothing much left but a smoldering crater of cut steel and molten metal. Then the 110 story building next door does the same thing.

[drone] Where does the energy come from to do all this work? [/drone]
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Yes, those droning laws of physics. Like conservation of energy. It's so annoying when trying to convince others of an impossible scenario. Like, a 110 story building crushes itself into shredded steel and fine powder, and ejects the steel up to 600 feel laterally, while the powder forms pyroclastic flows and rapidly expands to more than 3 times the volume of the intact building while remaining clearly defined and exhibiting a tell-tale "cauliflower" shape, a mushroom cloud forms where the building just was, giving the whole thing a distinct resemblance to a volacano, and when it's over, there is nothing much left but a smoldering crater of cut steel and molten metal. Then the 110 story building next door does the same thing.

[drone] Where does the energy come from to do all this work? [/drone]
Click to expand...
The same place they come from in an actual CD...
E=mgh
 
Well, since it was kenetic energy (there were no bombs) that we saw as it fell (that's where it was probably pulverized the most, right?), it was there in the first place as potential energy, because of the building's mass and gravity (like Kilted Yaksman said). So I guess this brings me to the question, do you have any education is physics that might be relevant to a building falling down? I don't, so someone please correct me if I've confused my energies :)
 
Last edited:
BS101 said:
[drone] Where does the energy come from to do all this work? [/drone]
Click to expand...

a.) a silent truckbomb
b.) a silent nuclear bomb
c.) a volcano
d.) none of the above

First to answer correctly, get's a cookie.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Yes, those droning laws of physics. Like conservation of energy. It's so annoying when trying to convince others of an impossible scenario. Like, a 110 story building crushes itself into shredded steel and fine powder, and ejects the steel up to 600 feel laterally, while the powder forms pyroclastic flows and rapidly expands to more than 3 times the volume of the intact building while remaining clearly defined and exhibiting a tell-tale "cauliflower" shape, a mushroom cloud forms where the building just was, giving the whole thing a distinct resemblance to a volacano, and when it's over, there is nothing much left but a smoldering crater of cut steel and molten metal. Then the 110 story building next door does the same thing.

[drone] Where does the energy come from to do all this work? [/drone]
Click to expand...

I am assuming from these words you NEVER visited the towers site.

Wow unbelievable.
 
It is assumed that potential energy is responsible for that, because we have seen how the state is an hour after the plane crashed in. And if you look mechanically to the situation there is no other energy, not much that can explain what happened.

The pulverization and all other things started when the block of N floors crashed with it's initial speed sqrt(2gh_floor) onto the next floor, with about 8.6 m/s.

The utter-absurdity of this is the following:

If you place your origin somewhere between the highest intact floor below the falling block and the block itself and you call it (x',y',z') with speed 4.3 m/s and it starts at t=t'=0 in the direction of the centre of the earth, then by the assumption of a domino effect you see in fact the following (rotated):


[] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ----------> <---------- [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []

[] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ------> <------ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []

[] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ---> <--- [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []

[] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] -> <- [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []

[] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ?? [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []

Our eminent friend F.R.Greening will surely know what will happen and some high-school students also, maybe even some people that did only primary school, but he doesn't write it on paper, what happened with him when he wrote down his paper ? He assumes uniform mass, i.e. you can place a virtual wall. Of course the real situation is extremely complex, but if they allow him to make these simple assumptions we can also do that as ordinary people as long as we make no mistakes and know what we do step by step. The centre of gravity will however still go down with inelastic collisions but it's defenitely no pancaking as they assume. The collapse time cannot be explained.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Yes, those droning laws of physics. Like conservation of energy. It's so annoying when trying to convince others of an impossible scenario. Like, a 110 story building crushes itself into shredded steel and fine powder, and ejects the steel up to 600 feel laterally, while the powder forms pyroclastic flows and rapidly expands to more than 3 times the volume of the intact building while remaining clearly defined and exhibiting a tell-tale "cauliflower" shape, a mushroom cloud forms where the building just was, giving the whole thing a distinct resemblance to a volacano, and when it's over, there is nothing much left but a smoldering crater of cut steel and molten metal. Then the 110 story building next door does the same thing.

[drone] Where does the energy come from to do all this work? [/drone]
Click to expand...

Please, by all means, follow up on my suggestion of
Howabout this, we do some real scientific analysis, some real scientific process; following the scientific methodology as it were. Pick one thing from Pickering's site, the thing you find most convincing. Start a thread to discuss that one thing and let's follow it all the way to its conclusion. In the new thread, stick to only talking about that one thing, and once resolution is achieved, drop that thread and start a new on on the next one thing to discuss.
Click to expand...
from here
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom