Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Huntsman said:
Ah, okay :)

I assumed sideflash and downtapes were specific to electric bleedover in demolition...heh. Wondered why they'd have specific names for it.

So I guess the explosives questions are still up to me...I'll do my best :)
Click to expand...

If this magic rebar exists, then it should be possible for the CTers to produce evidence....test results? BS, BS EN, or ISO tests? BBA? BRE? Standard specifications? Hell I've got a stainless steel fixings catalogue here and it doesn't mention any such thing.

Or they could FoI Building Warrant/Code application drawings? Or applications for demolition of tall buildings?

But of course they don't because it just doesn't exist - a bit like the ol' Invisocrete!
 
Architect said:
If this magic rebar exists, then it should be possible for the CTers to produce evidence....test results? BS, BS EN, or ISO tests? BBA? BRE? Standard specifications? Hell I've got a stainless steel fixings catalogue here and it doesn't mention any such thing.

Or they could FoI Building Warrant/Code application drawings? Or applications for demolition of tall buildings?

But of course they don't because it just doesn't exist - a bit like the ol' Invisocrete!
Click to expand...

Stealth nukes, man.

No boom, no flash, no residue, no radiation.

IN fact, when they're used, you can't tell that any type of explosive was ever used at all.

:D
 
I'll swop you it for the C4 coated rebar I've got on my recently finished Manchester job.....
 
Architect said:
If this magic rebar exists, then it should be possible for the CTers to produce evidence....
Click to expand...


Who needs evidence when you have a photo taken 5 miles away!

-Andrew

gumboot said:
Who needs evidence when you have a photo taken 5 miles away!

-Andrew
Click to expand...

The photo of he rebar is taken from 7500 feet. The image of the spire is taken by the same camera one second before so the scale and size of the rebar is apparent.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3159&stc=1&d=1158516673
 

Attachments

  • spire_dust-3.jpg
    spire_dust-3.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 1
dirtywick said:
Additionally, if that were the case, a stray bolt of lightning could cause the whole tower to come down, and in a building that tall it's a very real possibility.
Click to expand...

There have also been several fires in the twin towers in the years since they were built.

What would the over/under be on all of those fires missing all of those hypothetical explosives that were built into at the time of construction?
 
If we should use 'common sense' I would expect the block wouldn't fall and if it does it takes the way of least resistance, i.e. through air (after breaking some floors) and not through the building itself. But common sense is no science.

Let's have a look of the common sense of the offical report,

greening-model.gif


I can't believe people believe this utter-nonsense as a model and stop
thinking because it has been written black on white in a report.
 
Last edited:
einsteen said:
If we should use 'common sense' I would expect the block wouldn't fall and if it does it takes the way of least resistance, i.e. through air (after breaking some floors) and not through the building itself.
Click to expand...
No, common sense says that things fall down, and can't turn in mid-air to avoid hitting something.
 
einsteen said:
If we should use 'common sense' I would expect the block wouldn't fall and if it does it takes the way of least resistance, i.e. through air (after breaking some floors) and not through the building itself. But common sense is no science.

Let's have a look of the common sense of the offical report,

http://members.lycos.nl/einsteen/greening-model.gif

I can't believe people believe this utter-nonsense as a model and stop
thinking because it has been written black on white in a report.
Click to expand...
What block?
 
Architect said:
Trying a bit of self-analysis, Chris?
Click to expand...

No, but you should try it sometime. Your tendency to evade and pretend you know things you don't may become apparent to you as you gain self awareness.

Christophera said:
I already did. These morons create so much garbage you lost track of it.

"Are you under the impression that columns that are assembled as segments can resist torsion? Are you under the impression that a 1300 foot steel member that is "assembled" can resist torsion? Are you under the impression that a 1300 foot piece of steel called a column can resist torsion better than 4 steel perimeter shear walls in a box shape?"
Click to expand...

Architect said:
Your question doesn't make sense.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom