• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

More trouble in LC paradise. JohnDoe takes his research and goes home.

Fascinating. On his youtube page John Boy was not happy w/ some comments I left for him. I had replied to his comments, so that mine would be seen at the top of the comments section. So John Boy deleted his comment, which also eliminated my comments in reply. Poor little control freak, I just re-posted my comments to someone else's (not a CT'er) comment so it is still at the top and he can't do a thing about it.

I'm SSHitman there btw.
 
Cheeseburger_Picnic said:
JohndoeX's youtube account shows his age as 26, yet he claims to have been a pilot for over 20 years. How is that?
Click to expand...
Apparently It's okay to lie when you are seeking the truth

Cheeseburger_Picnic said:
why are all you f*cks so worried about johndoex and how much flight experience he has? who the f*ck really cares? when you pricks come here and do this ****, you make yourselves look like morons. go play in traffic. PLEASE.
Click to expand...
Cheeseburger_Picnic said:
attack the person... not the data...
Click to expand...
Cheeseburger_Picnic said:
JohndoeX p'wns you. Think about your obsessions.
Click to expand...
 
WildCat said:
Fascinating. On his youtube page John Boy was not happy w/ some comments I left for him. I had replied to his comments, so that mine would be seen at the top of the comments section. So John Boy deleted his comment, which also eliminated my comments in reply. Poor little control freak, I just re-posted my comments to someone else's (not a CT'er) comment so it is still at the top and he can't do a thing about it.

I'm SSHitman there btw.
Click to expand...

It looks as though they are trying to recreate the LC forum over there. Many of the same players (chucksheen) trying to defend the lack of evidence.
 
CptColumbo said:
It looks as though they are trying to recreate the LC forum over there. Many of the same players (chucksheen) trying to defend the lack of evidence.
Click to expand...
I've e-mailed Russell in the past. I respect him more than any other CTer's. johndoeX is a pathetic to say the least.
 
Stellafane said:
JDX is 26, yet has been a pilot for 20 years, heh heh heh...I've always been in the camp that pegged him for a fraud, but now can there be any doubt?
Click to expand...

I've been making paper planes since about the age of 5, so does that mean I'm now been a pilot for 36 years and not the 23 I thought I had?

I must admit that I wet my pants far less now though when things go wrong. It's the professional training and thick pants we get in the trade, you see.
 
hey, SSHitman, you might want to post this on DOH!s youtube comments.

Baro altimeters don't have lag? BULL! Shows his complete lack of understanding.

Hysteresis Error - Hysteresis error is a lag inaltitude indication due to the elastic properties of the material within the altimeter. This occurs after an aircraft has maintained a constant altitude for an extended period of time and then makes a large, rapid altitude change. After a rapid descent, readings are higher than actual. This error is negligible during climbs or descent at a slow rate or after maintaning a new altitude for a short period of time.
Click to expand...

http://www.tpub.com/content/aviation/14030/css/14030_45.htm

Hysteresis error is induced by sudden changes in altitude which results in a lag in altimeter response due to elastic properties of the material which comprise the instrument.
Click to expand...

http://www.airmech.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=3794

Generally, this instrument responds immediately to altitude changes. During climbs and descents, however, the altimeter may lag behind the air crafts actual altitude. For this reason, some lead is necessary when leveling off to compensate for this characteristic. A simple rule of thumb is to lead the desired level-off altitude by 10% of the vertical velocity.
Click to expand...

http://www.allstar.fiu.edu/aero/PSI.htm

IFR Lesson Guide

*
*
c. Lag in the altimeter.
(1) Make an abrupt pitch change and point out the momentary lag in the altimeter.
(2) Make small, smooth pitch changes and point out that the altimeter, for practical purposes, has no lag.
Click to expand...

http://www.geocities.com/cfidarren/iplesson1.htm

And this guy reckons he's a QFI? Yeah, right, and monkeys might fly out of my butt!
 
B-Man said:
I'm not 'typical', I've had a bit of an odd career as such.
From my latest resume, only a few weeks old ->

...

So there ya go, that's all my stuff.
Click to expand...


Thanks a tonne for your thoroughly detailed response. :)

This confirms something I had suspected. Earlier in this thread I made this post:

We currently have over 10 pilots and growing at Pilots For Truth. Current combined experience is over 40,000 Hours flight time with ATP, Commercial, Primary and Advanced Flight Instructors etc...

...Kingair001 and I flew for the same airline. We both together have combined experience of over 15,000 hours total flight time.
Click to expand...

Can someone tell me if these numbers sound right? They don't to me.

They're talking about an AVERAGE of 4,000hrs per pilot, which seems low. It is made worse when you consider that Kingair001 and John between them apparantly have 15,000 hrs, and furthermore some of these 10 are apparantly instructors.

Considering that the absolute minimum to even qualify for ATP is 1500hrs, and airlines generally hire people well above the legal minimums, this seems far below what is likely.
Click to expand...

Your comments pretty much confirm that 40,000 hours, for ten experienced pilots (some advanced flight instructors) would be very low.

-Andrew
 
Whoops can't edit my jumbled old post...

Anyway I think I'm going to ask some pilots for some more info on this little debate.
 
Last edited:
Pretty soon DOH! will be the only one there - after savaging Russell Pickering, check him out here:
water_bender said:
Azrael said:
johndoeX said:
(after i moved to pentagon public forum)

Who is outraged? What are they trying to hide? Why do they not want to explain the current data we hold? Why are we hitting brick walls?

Are corporate relationships more important than Americans learning the truth?
Click to expand...
This is a long shot but do you have links to the raw FDR data and interpreted results maybe from other crashes or other investigations recorded by the same or similar recorders? I'm thinking of trying to reverse engineer the data. I know nothing about flight but have experience with compression and binary files.

Again, this is really a long shot.
Click to expand...
azrael im doing the same thing. i have the fdr and csv, from multiple sources, and am using mathematica as my engine to do the decryption. im not sure but am fairly certain i have all of the codes needed for the decode and will know better tomorrow. any help though is greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...
water. .no offense.. but you said you were working on this last month.

You havent offered much.. but i appreciate you trying to step up to the plate...

Lets see some results please.. either way.

Does it really take more than a month to try to decode a file?

Boeing says they can do it in 10 minutes... granted they have the decode software.. but still.. can you do it or no...........?
Click to expand...
Followed by:
also.. if anyone feels threatened or offended by my "straight shooter-in your face attitude"

Tough *****! ... i want answers and im not gonna sugar coat it to get them. Im past attracting more bee's with honey. Im past trying to do a tap-dance for answers...

Give me answers or im gonna get in your face.
Click to expand...

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=11159

Who wants bets that he gets assassinated by someone from the LC forum?
 
Russell SLAMS JDX, luckily I copied and screencapped it in case its gone or edited later.

Let me clarify this.

1) We should stop trying to explain what happened at the Pentagon.

2) We should just listen to you the first time you speak.

3) We should not have any evidence in our theories that suggest a plane hit the building because the government said it did (did planes hitting the towers make the official story true?)

4) I am a disappointment and you don't respect me because after three years of dedicated research one of my graphics ends up being 72" off when using an image taken from outer space interpreted by Google after an attempt to correct it.

5) I won't be banned by a guy who has been into this for 90 days and has no knowledge of the Pentagon. Who nobody knows who he is or what his real certifications and qualifications are and who is not currently employed as a pilot.

6) You are hear to correct my errors.

7) You won't start a thread on evidence because somebody else filed an FOIA request that produced an .fdr file you had nothing to do with and latched on to one piece of data that somebody else extrapolated from a .csv file and you will solve the Pentagon crime with it and other evidence isn't important any more.

8) All thoughts in this forum fall under your jurisdiction.

I am ashamed to think of people watching Dylan's movie and coming to this forum for more answers and running into you.
Click to expand...


Oh and further down in that thread linked to above was this gem:
Lets just put it this way... i have devoted my life to finding the truth.. this is not a hobby to me... and until i get answers.. i wont rest.. i wont defer.. i wont be distracted by spin.. family.. or friends...

Get it?

Now.. you may think of this as a hobby.. im sorry to hear you have an ill girlfriend... im a cancer survivor myself.. but it does not detour me from being a patriot 24/7.
Click to expand...

So THAT'S why he hasn't had an actual job as a pilot in so long! He's busy looking for the troof!
 
Last edited:
Obviousman said:
hey, SSHitman, you might want to post this on DOH!s youtube comments.
Click to expand...
Done. Good one Obviousman!

The youtube comments software seems to be a bit flaky, sometimes I can see my comments and sometimes I can't. I presume they show up for everyone else?
 
mrfreeze said:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=12614

It seems that Russell Pickering will be banned soon enough. Maybe we can get him?
Click to expand...

Negative. I've already invited him, he isnt interested. He is also firmly in the CT court, he just happens to be the most honest researcher they have. He showed up for a week or so at SLC and engaged in a little back and forth - but has since never come back..

Supposedly, he is doing a modern day Northwoods paper in which he'll outline the plane-swaps, takeover methods etc. I've been licking my chops waiting for that puppy to come out :D
 
It seems all my comments have been removed from D'ohs youtube video page. Something is going on here, I sent a message to customer service, see what happens.

eta: Now they're back, must be some flaky software issue they have.
 
Last edited:
WildCat said:
It seems all my comments have been removed from D'ohs youtube video page. Something is going on here, I sent a message to customer service, see what happens.

eta: Now they're back, must be some flaky software issue they have.
Click to expand...

I clicked on your link about 10 minutes ago. 25 comments, none from you. Clicked on it again a minute ago, 18 comments, none from you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom