Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
in addition, if jet fuel got into the elevator shafts they were either

A: not hermetically sealed to begin with
B: damaged by the impact with at least 1 hole large enough for significant amounts fo jet fuel to get in
and:
nobody was getting on of off an elevator on any of those floors (Doors were shut!) at the time.
 
Wasn't Epstein on "Welcome Back Kotter" a Puerto Rican Joo?

It was on ABC, a major MSM outlet, no doubt secretly controlled by the Joos..
no doubt planting the seeds for acceptance of the Mossad takeover among the Latino community as far back as the late '70s.

Was that sufficiently paranoid?
Gabe Kaplan is. So what?

DR
 
I have been lurking in this thread from the beginning and just wanted to say that you guys and gals have kicked loads of truthers ass. I am proud to be a silent member of this fine community.

Ran across a video of engineers talking about the wtc 7 collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1r2cX225EQ&NR

Thought it may be useful in this fight.

Nice, thanks! I had to laugh at the comment of the guy who posted it though:

Watch the History Channel contradict themselves when they say nobody was killed when WTC7 collapsed because they had plenty of time to evacuate beforehand, but then the remains couldn't be examined because it had to be removed quickly to rescue survivors.

So now the History Channel is in on the coverup! (Quick, somebody tell the History Channel Australia!)
 
I KNEW I had misplaced one of my denizens...

Hmph. I can't see the photo, perhaps they've removed it since they read about it here at JREF :)

On the up side, though, I sure got a kick out of the following statement on the loose change site - one of the very, very few pieces of truth I've ever seen them write:

We have done nothing extraordinary in terms of research.

Of course, had they refrained from the use of the word "extraordinary", it would have been even more honest and true.
 
Last edited:
Apparently, I've finally been banned from Loose Change boards. My talk of polite discussion apparently didn't go over very well with the mods.

But a suprising number of tolerant posters were actually sticking up for me. I wish I could've talked to them a bit longer. That would've been a very interesting discussion.
 
Gross! You got some fanboy on me.

You'd take Speilberg over Hitchcock, Kubrick, Scorsese, Capra, DeMille, and Wells? You need to get some perspective!


I would. Easy. In fact Kubrick even acknowledge Spielberg's superior skills by begging him to do A.I. (Spielberg refused, but agreed to write the screenplay and help out).

-Andrew
 
Check out the top of the ST911 site. Jones is asserting his power

If America is destroyed, it may be by Americans who salute the flag, sing the national anthem, march in patriotic parades, cheer Fourth of July speakers - normally good Americans who fail to comprehend what is required to keep our country strong and free - Americans who have been lulled into a false security (April 1968).

--Ezra Taft Benson, US Secretary of Agriculture 1953-1961 under Eisenhower



Respect my authoritay!

[qimg]http://www.tonyrogers.com/news/images/cartman_cop.jpg[/qimg]


Oops... I missed this one by about 30 pages.

Anyway, here's the extra bit that JamesB sort of missed.

He's absolutely right about Jones laying claim to a certain type of authroity, but it's not that of the Dept. of Agriculture. After he left government service at the end of the Eisenhower administration, Ezra Taft Benson returned to full time service in the mormon church. At the time of his appointment to the presidental cabinet, he was already a member of the Quorum of The Twelve, the ruling body of the LDS church. In 1985, he became the prophet and highest mortal authority in the church.

To the average Joe, Professor Jones is making an obscure political reference. What he is really doing, is placing himself on the right hand of the right hand of God.

Not that any of you would be suprised at this, we all knew already that Jones is an arrogant schmuck.
 
I would. Easy. In fact Kubrick even acknowledge Spielberg's superior skills by begging him to do A.I. (Spielberg refused, but agreed to write the screenplay and help out).

-Andrew

So wait, that means I can still blame Spielburg for that piece of [rule8] add on at the end that totally ruined the ending right? Either that or Kubrick had alzheimers or something that made him go crazy and tack that on right??
 
So wait, that means I can still blame Spielburg for that piece of [rule8] add on at the end that totally ruined the ending right? Either that or Kubrick had alzheimers or something that made him go crazy and tack that on right??


Who knows. Maybe Kubrick had that in his original story, maybe he didn't. Spielberg is the only person alive who would know. Having said that, Kubrick was a little nuts about this project so maybe... (he insisted on communicating purely via a fax that he kept hidden in his wardrobe. Spielberg had to have his own "secret" dedicated fax hidden away somewhere too) This went on for a good decade.

-Andrew
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom