Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
60hzxtl said:
I'm just really surprised you talented guys haven't monkeyed with the signs...
Click to expand...

Well, if you insist

361744f494f08991f.gif
 
I'm just really surprised you talented guys haven't monkeyed with the signs...
Click to expand...

Anyone have a forum account at somethingawful.com? I suspect they could do a masterful job of "modifying" them.
 
CurtC said:
The site was down for a while, but I just checked, and I don't see anything unusual. Which one are you referring to? Is it still there?
Click to expand...

Look for this caption, "Cnn's Jamie McIntyre was reporting live from the Pentagon, and describes exactly how much of the plane is left..."
 
if they fixed it the pic of Jamie McIntyre was replaced with the mutated tapeworm monster from the x-files (which IIRC escaped into NY's sewers, perhaps he was involved in 9/11)
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Look for this caption, "Cnn's Jamie McIntyre was reporting live from the Pentagon, and describes exactly how much of the plane is left..."
Click to expand...
Honestly I think its because they're mad at him. Instead of using the deceptive edited clip, he used the full clip on air to debunk the CT theories attributed to him. Basicly Jamie made them look like fools on air. Which really isn't hard to do.
 
Here is a question:

Has anyone ever attempted to set up a unique thread here on JREF, where only four people can post...A debator from the Debunking side, a debator for the "truth" side, and a moderator from each side?

Or perhaps just one moderator, a neutral one.

I mean you could pick any aspect of 9/11, get them to debate. Noone else can post, or mock, but we all get to watch.

Any thoughts?
 
T.A.M. said:
Here is a question:

Has anyone ever attempted to set up a unique thread here on JREF, where only four people can post...A debator from the Debunking side, a debator for the "truth" side, and a moderator from each side?

Or perhaps just one moderator, a neutral one.

I mean you could pick any aspect of 9/11, get them to debate. Noone else can post, or mock, but we all get to watch.

Any thoughts?
Click to expand...

fwiw they've done it here. You can see how it's done and if it may work here.
 
T.A.M. said:
Here is a question:

Has anyone ever attempted to set up a unique thread here on JREF, where only four people can post...A debator from the Debunking side, a debator for the "truth" side, and a moderator from each side?

Or perhaps just one moderator, a neutral one.

I mean you could pick any aspect of 9/11, get them to debate. Noone else can post, or mock, but we all get to watch.

Any thoughts?
Click to expand...
Yep, it was done here for DJLegacy's great debate w/ Gravy. When Gravy showed up, DJ ran like a sissy.

The Loosers are all cowards who run from facts and logic like a vampire from holy water and garlic. It will never happen.
 
WildCat said:
Yep, it was done here for DJLegacy's great debate w/ Gravy. When Gravy showed up, DJ ran like a sissy.

The Loosers are all cowards who run from facts and logic like a vampire from holy water and garlic. It will never happen.
Click to expand...

its when any one of us can do a better job of defending "iside job" theories than they can
 
Interesting. It seems to work for them (wolfshades link).

Of course, set rules would have to be set up and agreed upon. More importantly, you have to convince some of the "truthers" to come over and debate.
 
Another point, would be finding an arbitor/referee. You would either need one from each side, which would be chaotic, or someone neutral enough to do the job unbiased. They also need to be extremely fluent in the art of debate.

Perhaps someone here at JREF who doesn't post in the Conspiracy Theory forums, but meets all teh requirements.
 
T.A.M. said:
Another point, would be finding an arbitor/referee. You would either need one from each side, which would be chaotic, or someone neutral enough to do the job unbiased. They also need to be extremely fluent in the art of debate.

Perhaps someone here at JREF who doesn't post in the Conspiracy Theory forums, but meets all teh requirements.
Click to expand...

Perhaps RandFan?
 
I do not know him, but in you ropinion does he meet the criteria of a neutral arbitor/referee? As well, is he fluent enough in the art of debating, to call either side out when they "Call to authority", or "Strawman" etc...you know, the who debate terminology thing (which I am far from fluent in).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom