Its done with mirrors...Oh, come on Christophera. I'm sure you can answer this:
How the hell could someone at this angle see anything through a concrete core ?
http://concretecore.741.com
contains proof of the concrete core. You have provided no proof of the FEMA core from raw images of the demolition to counter it. No one has.
Consider that the shear amount of concrete seen exploding here needs reasonable explanation, proof .......... and you have provided none.
Oh, come on Christophera. I'm sure you can answer this:
![]()
How the hell could someone at this angle see anything through a concrete core ?
Uh Chris, light seems to be shining through your solid concrete core...![]()
GOT INTEGRITY?
Your post is a graphic and linguistic distortion. Wrong angle, wrong hallway opening wdith/location and an gross over-generalization.
Your post is a graphic and linguistic distortion. Wrong angle, wrong hallway opening wdith/location and an gross over-generalization.
...Course, it doesn't really matter, unless your hallways are THIS big :
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1877683#post1877683It sucks being wrong don't it?
Don't it suck not being able to reconcile your inanities with reality?It sucks being wrong don't it?
In other words, about as accurate as this diagram from your site. You know the one, based on your recollections of a TV show you saw back in 1990 and corroborated by an anonoymous engineer who saw a different program in 1995.Your post is a graphic and linguistic distortion. Wrong angle, wrong hallway opening wdith/location and an gross over-generalization.
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_879044e6c65e64d34.jpg[/qimg]
GOT INTEGRITY?
A fair description of your posts in this thread.Your post is a graphic and linguistic distortion.
Yet you will not or cannot address his point.Wrong angle, wrong hallway opening wdith/location and an gross over-generalization.
Belz, yes, and demonstrably so. You, no, and demonstrably so as well.[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_879044e6c65e64d34.jpg[/qimg]
GOT INTEGRITY?
It sucks being wrong don't it?
A fair description of your posts in this thread.
Yet you will not or cannot address his point.
Belz, yes, and demonstrably so. You, no, and demonstrably so as well.
Is this due to fear of liability claims? Given the fact of the building no longer being in existence, I am curious at this course of action.
- Wouldn't you like to pick up where we left off with your towers-fell-in-the-wrong-sequence claim?It sucks being wrong don't it?
- Wouldn't you like to pick up where we left off with your towers-fell-in-the-wrong-sequence claim?
- Will you retract your claim (made on another board) that you were banned from this forum?
- What are your plans for presenting your evidence to one or more scientific journals?
- Will you apologize for your unprovoked attack on me?