Loose Change - Part IV

[Hutch]

Awww, Sir Knight has left the building and I never got to say hello?

Whoever he was, that was an education to any readers of this thread on what Gravy/Markyx/Brainster/others who take on these challenges directly face. I salute you gentlemen's patience and forbearance.

Some hilarious news from the LC forum. DJLegacy has been banned, and some members believe he was a gubmint shill all along. That's why he wouldn't debate here!

Woah! DJLegacy was one of the strongest supporters of LC, at least he always impressed me as one. Could it be with all the skeptics banned, the Revolution has begun to feed on itself?? I really wonder how long Russell Pickering (the only LC member I believe we could have a civil discussion with over here) will last in the New LC Order? If not, he has a standing invitation from me to come over to the Dark Side...

And DJ Legacy, your account here is still good, if you'd like to take Gravy up on the debate, I'll gladly bump the thread...

 

[T.A.M.]

Ya...that guy needs a little...RAAAMMMMOOOONNNNEEEE!!!!!!

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Gravy - I think "roe" also refers to a deer or gazelle. Either way, old Sol was burning up alot of oxygen just to say "nice rack".

Of course, that's just my interpretation.

Hutch - Yes, I'm afraid you've missed Knights 6th, maybe 7th departure from the boards. His 8th, 9th and 10th departures will likely occur within the next hour so stick around.

 

[Gravy]

Hmmm one parting note: Rational behavior, making up scripture sure isn't rational behavior

Ahem.

"Wherefore thus saith the Lord GOD Behold I am against your pillows wherewith ye there hunt the souls to make them fly and I will tear them from your arms and will let the souls go even the souls that ye hunt to make them fly." Ezekiel 13:20 (KJV/Strong's Hebrew)

 

[Gravy]

Gravy - I think "roe" also refers to a deer or gazelle. Either way, old Sol was burning up alot of oxygen just to say "nice rack".

Of course, that's just my interpretation.

I know...just having fun with it.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

I know...just having fun with it.

"How beautiful you are and how pleasing, O love, with your delights! Your stature is like that of the palm, and your breasts like clusters of fruit. I said, 'I will climb the palm tree; I will take hold of its fruit.'

i always liked that one, lol

 

[delphi_ote]

I agree, but isn't it fun to call these people out?

Sir Knight, you have not behaved honorably. Your knighthood is hereby revoked.

Yea. I just thought it was some real zen **** that his own story unraveled itself. If it were true, he would be dead and therefore unable to tell us the story.

 

[Submersible]

I've done my 'homework' , and come to the conclusion that the majority of you need to locate and identify with the "freak amino ACID" in your refridgerator and take a long hard look at how it got there.

To be honest with you, besides avoiding a known source of cancer (IGF-1)my ability to believe my own eyes has greatly improved over the last 5 or 6 months.
The "truth" about 9-11 is the good news compared to the fact that most of you have no eartly idea what the USG is and has been injecting into our food supply, but it does explain why most of you here are more than willing to mock or insult others who keep questioning the evidence, when very little if any remains.

I'm certainly not claiming that I know what happened unlike many of you, but common sense will tell you that teeth don't "evaporate" and besides the many questions about tower 7, there is 1 image that shows a body inside the pentagon and nothing to prove that flight 93 contained passengers.

Google the quoted phrase and after you've done a little bit of homework on the contents of your food, think about the chemical constitution of your thoughts before so many of you keep standing so close to the USG's claims on 9-11.

I know that "we the people" are not on the same team, that's all I'm going to say.

 

[T.A.M.]

(1) somehow, SUB, I doubt that is all you will have to say.
(2) What does the things placed in foods have to do with 9/11...oh wait, wait...I know...the NEW WORLD ORDER...MOLACH...THE BOHEMIAN GROVE.....
Wait...here he comes.....>RAAAAMMMMMMMMOOOOONNNEEEE!!!!!!!

(3) You didn't do any real homework did you. Tell me the number of scientific papers you read, TRUELY PEER REVIEWED (So that takes out all the Scholars for 9/11 Studies articles), versus the number of bogus "Videos" you watched that told you the real "Truth".

So you read the implosionworld paper...not good enough...so you read the MIT Civil Engineer Paper on 9/11....nto good enough...all govt shills eh?...yup, no doubt.

If you don't like the preservatives in your McNuggets, that buy organic. If you don't like organic, than move to northern europe, buy a farm, and live off the land.

What the govt puts in food...give me a break.

Oh wait...and ASPARTAME CAUSES BRAIN CANCER...right...waht a crock of SHAITE!!!

Sorry, I am a little course, but I have to go to work in the real world tomorrow...some of us have real jobs...

 

[kevin]

Is that lunatic David Thompson really Sir Knight. How did you deduce that?

is this his patent?
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...NM.&OS=in/Thompson-David&RS=IN/Thompson-David

 

[T.A.M.]

Posted August 13th on LC forum by user "Beached"

The 911myths site is just nonesense, and in fact I know it's run by imdb's propagandist in chief for their United 93 and World Trade Center message boards. He goes by the username of PhillyPhreak13. Sometimes i'll post on the imdb just to see if i can get the attention of any of the skeptics. Once you start leaving the skeptics speechless he usually butts in and tries to "debunk" everything you are saying by copy/pasting links to his site and large portions of Popular Mechanics and the 9/11 Comission Report.

However, his analysis are nothing more than propaganda - with his perverse physics he's a champion to skeptics in the same way Fred Leuchter was a champion to Neo-Nazi's! He will either skirt around the issue, or in the case of one showing how ridiculous his analysis is of the colapse of the WTC, he will have your posts removed! I remember i posted numerous pictures of the construction of the WTC clearly showing the core colums with a link to an analysis by Prf. Steven Jones. Not long after that post was promptly removed! I rest my case!!!

So Mike is the chief Propagandist for "United 93" movie on IMDB...interesting...never knew.

Apparently LC forum gurus do not like the 911myths site very much...who would have guessed...

 

[Sir Knight]

is this his patent?
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...NM.&OS=in/Thompson-David&RS=IN/Thompson-David

Yep that is me, boy you guys finally tracked me down. Darn it.
Yeah the gov is trying to steal my computerized software driven
fishing line dispenser to use on the next moon shot.

And just imagine I thought you guys were a joke.

Good job researching that.

Dave

 

[defaultdotxbe]

So Mike is the chief Propagandist for "United 93" movie on IMDB...interesting...never knew.

Apparently LC forum gurus do not like the 911myths site very much...who would have guessed...

they just cant grasp the concept that more than half a dozen intelligent people disagree with them

 

[mrfreeze]

Now they have Ted Turner on their side because TNT is showing A few good men, the patriot, and runaway jury in a row. Since those are "Anti-Government" movies, Ted must believe in the CT.

 

[Gord_in_Toronto]

Well like the guy said, I have had all the fun I can stand.

you will have to look for someone else or continue on without me.

This is not even a skeptical forum from what I can see, don't know what is really it's purpose but it doesn't feel real at all.

So I am REALLY out of here. But don't think I am leaving on a note that says what I said wasn't or isn't true.

Be happy in your bubble, most of you will be happy for some reason I am sure.

Sir Knight

Snicker.

 

[tsig]

Hey great post, first really intellectually sound thing I have seen here. Ok,now if there IS a conspiracy and someone really knows something where exactly would you think he should go to?

And if he did show up on a site such as this what would he to do to convince someone?



..maybe if you more inviting.

Fine, so be it.[/QUOTE/]

So if we kissed you it would change the facts.

 

[MarkyX]

they just cant grasp the concept that more than half a dozen intelligent people disagree with them

With the emails I've been getting, I would say with confidence that a huge number of them do.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Sorry, but I had to crosspost this

From the unexplained-mysteries forum (thanks tk0001 for the intro a while back); someone brought BYU's Jones into the debate. I countered. After reading their response I didn't feel I really needed to add anything

Jones' paper does not have the backing of the academic or professional communities:
Critiques of Jones' paper by experts in the field:

"The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones." - The College of Engineering and Technology department

"But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California

"There's nothing to debunk," says Zdenek P. Bazant, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Northwestern University and the author of the first peer-reviewed paper on the World Trade Center collapses.

"It's a non-issue," says Sivaraj Shyam-Sunder, a lead investigator for the National Institute of Standards and Technology's study of the collapses.

Ross B. Corotis, a professor of civil engineering

Thomas W. Eagar is one scientist who has paid some attention to the demolition hypothesis — albeit grudgingly. A materials engineer

why would you need the backing of people that do not have the credentials or mathamatical background to contest his hypothesis?-- experts in the field of engineering do not have the credentials to debate the mathamatical aspect of the collapse-- is there not one physics dr willing to debate him on the issue?-- of course not because its an open and shut case it does not take an expert to determine the story surrounding bldg 7 is a complete fabrication to the point of being comical-- just like if youve ever been skateboarding with a friend and he fell and broke his arm to the point where the bone was protruding through the skin and blood was spilling out it would not take a doctor to determine the fact that it would have been a "compound" fracture-- whats worse is that there are people that would be trying to claim its only a sprain even though there was blood,bone and a right degree angle in the center of the tibia and fibia-- how are the engineers going to dismiss the box column??? c'mon people can you not add 2 and 2?-- bush's executive order w199i,pnac calling for a "new pearl harbor",the rush into iraq on fake evidence and the current price of gas all scream inside job even if you disregaurd the obvious evidence in the videos of the collapses themselves--9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!! just ask Lt Col Robert Bowman or someone from bush's first administration like Morgan Reynolds who was chief economist in the labor dept during W jr's entire first term who proclaims demolition charges and the fact that it was an inside job-- please tell us why should we listen to you over these people??
-9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!

 

[Sir Knight]

Hey great post, first really intellectually sound thing I have seen here. Ok,now if there IS a conspiracy and someone really knows something where exactly would you think he should go to?

And if he did show up on a site such as this what would he to do to convince someone?



..maybe if you more inviting.

Fine, so be it.[/QUOTE/]

So if we kissed you it would change the facts.[/quote

Yeah quite a bit, in fact I would run from you and not stop.

Inviting meaning nice, receptive and hospitable was what had in mind.

I am not sure you are even trying to be real here. You guys treat everyone here like they are liars, don't believe a word they say rip them apart. A lot of what I was doing in the beginning was introducing myself like I saw in other posts, but boy I get bushwacked.

Being real is many things and only a few on here came across as real, and they are those that didn't make snide remarks and gave a little benefit of the doubt.

You others are just crass individuals. To even think that everyone is just going to believe anything I say would be stupid on my part, but to think that anything and everything I was going to say would be torn apart was not really a what I thought would happen. A lot of you guys went extreme

But it is your loss not mine........ Too late to kiss and make up. LOL

 

[Gravy]

Yep that is me, boy you guys finally tracked me down. Darn it.
Yeah the gov is trying to steal my computerized software driven
fishing line dispenser to use on the next moon shot.

And just imagine I thought you guys were a joke.

Good job researching that.

Dave

Dude, do you even have a sense of humor? Do you know what a JOKE is?

And what happened to being "really gone?" You can't even tell the truth about something as simple as that?

If you do return to this thread, Sir Benighted, please make it to discuss 9/11 issues, which we take seriously around here.

ETA: What? You're back already? Okay, chief, yes or no: are you going to discuss 9/11?

A simple yes or no, please, and stick to it.