Loose Change - Part IV

[Dog Town]

I can smell the cters swarm over lost liberties.How the gubbers taking them away! Yeah because of the terrorists.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Dog Town]

How soon till super ID claims it is all because they are getting to close to the truth! Another smoke screen to foil LC! They like themselves alot don't they?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

I lasted 20 min there. Can't view!

(assuming you have windows XP)

C:\Documents and Settings\**Your login name**\Cookies\**Your login name**@Loose_Change_Forum[1].txt

delete that, wait 15 minutes for your session to expire (unless you havent tried to access the LC forums in the last 15 minutes) and youll be able to read the forums again (assuming you havent been IP banned, in which case lemme know and ill hook you up with a proxy)

 

[Dog Town]

SSoooo Ip banned .Cleaned registry the other day. Still get you are not allowed here login page.

 

[Shrinker]

its a shame that some idiot islamics would do this and not wait for 9/11 truth to come out- they have just comepletely dont the opposite- if indeed this is real...

What?! Obviously this one hasn't been fully brainwashed. Better send him through universalseed again.

 

[Dog Town]

6 planes. These pricks are greedy.
8-11 to 911. These guys have a number issue! Thats a lucky number they're messing with. 11. And the number 7. CONSPIRACY?
I get it ! They like the game of craps.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

dag nabbit, someone posted a good tutorial on setting up a proxy in IE (i think it was in the LC pt III thread) but now i cant find it

 

[Dog Town]

no worries ! Hey did you notice I wanna change Duhh to Dog Town?
At your place!

 

[Dog Town]

Cter;
It is the plastic bag makers doing this!!!! Have you seen all the plastic bags they're giving out at the airports? Bet Marvin was running the company!

Nitey Nite!

 

[brumsen]

thats the indoctrination talking, you gotta think OUTSIDE the box!

lol

For one moment you had me thinking that you actually wanted to put an argument forward. But apparently not.

 

[brumsen]

Brumsen wants evidence of absence of evidence.

That's right. In this post I explained what form that might take.

Perhaps he can explain whether absence of evidence of absence of evidence is evidence or not.

Why, you wanna play with words?

 

[Cuddles]

That's right. In this post I explained what form that might take.

Why would they bother doing this? If they say they found no evidence of explosives, any sane person will assume they looked for evidence and didn't find any. If they're attempting to cover something up they could have just made up some results that didn't have explosives in them. If they didn't look for explosives at all then they wouldn't have bothered writing that they did, since no sane people actually deny that planes hitting a building could make it fall over.

 

[brumsen]

If they didn't look for explosives at all then they wouldn't have bothered writing that they did, since no sane people actually deny that planes hitting a building could make it fall over.

I guess that I'd want to hear that from NIST itself.

 

[Shrinker]

I guess that I'd want to hear that from NIST itself.

We aren't NIST. Come back when you've asked them.

 

[Belz...]

Semantics of the word 'belief' aside, let us then state, just for the record, that you believe that the NIST report contains the answer to my question as to how the assumption is justied that once begun the collapse would continue, but that you do not wish to be called upon to justify your belief by giving me a reference.

I haven't read the report, myself, so my belief is based on OTHER people who have.

However, it changes nothing about what I said : if you have something to say against the NIST report, you MUST have read it.

Also, I don't need to have read the report in order to comment on specific claims. I WOULD need to read it in order to defend it, which I haven't done so far.

Now, back to our regularly scheduled program.

 

[Belz...]

1) How has the conclusion that no evidence has been found for alternative hypotheses like CD by means of explosives been obtained?

By NOT finding any evidence.

It seems to me an awfully thick report if it is only about the conclusions.

Are you SURE you've read it ? You don't seem to know what's in it.

 

[brumsen]

We aren't NIST. Come back when you've asked them.

I have.

 

[Shrinker]

I have.

I beg your pardon, its a fast moving thread. Still, that leaves us with no evidence of no evidence. AKA nothing.

 

[MarkyX]

Just want to confirm this in case anyone asks..

The tapes of Flight 77. Does the owners of those tapes need to authorize release or is the FBI holding them?

 

[IronSnot]

I haven't posted there since they relegated critics to a "corner," but I couldn't help asking their Psychic Friends Network to "do me next."

Gravy
Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 63

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:18 am Post subject:
Do me next! Do me next!

------------------------------

Good luck with that, Gravy.