SteveGrenard
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2002
- Messages
- 5,528
I already conceded it was a good idea for both sides to be equippped with particulate filter masks. Obviously you did not read the specs in the 3M medical professional's site I posted above.
I have not suggested fumes nor are we talking about fumes. You made that up or drew your own conclusion. We are talking about particulate aerosols. Fumes connotate vapors which are substances in gas form.I admit I used the term gas mask only because a gas mask would protect against particulate aerosols. I also gave you the type of mask and the specs page for it and related products. In truth no fumes or vapors would be involved in this weapon. It would use paintball gun technology to non-lethally deliver the particles. There would be no vaporization but there would be a form of aerosolization.
I have not suggested fumes nor are we talking about fumes. You made that up or drew your own conclusion. We are talking about particulate aerosols. Fumes connotate vapors which are substances in gas form.I admit I used the term gas mask only because a gas mask would protect against particulate aerosols. I also gave you the type of mask and the specs page for it and related products. In truth no fumes or vapors would be involved in this weapon. It would use paintball gun technology to non-lethally deliver the particles. There would be no vaporization but there would be a form of aerosolization.
Last edited: