• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christophera said:
The towers you refer to are not falling yet so the debris outruns them.
Click to expand...

The towers aren't falling ? Why the DEBRIS, then ?

Christophera said:
We see through the hallways of the concrete core just fine.
Click to expand...

Yep. Invisicrete.

Christophera said:
Look, I've posted links to many images that SHOULD show at leat ONE of the 47, 1300 foot steel columns that you and FEMA claim existed, AND no steel columns are seen. Sorry, you've got the diagram of WTC 1 core and that is all I'm putting out.
Click to expand...

Many images ?
 
Christophera said:
I will have to look through them, but generally, except for a few, the concrete was fractured and fell instantly, as in near free fall.
Click to expand...

So... you mean that the core isn't really a core... because it WOULD HAVE BEEN GONE AT THAT POINT ?

Christophera said:
There is no reason concrete would show in that photo. It was most often at least 3 floors below the top floor and sometimes 7 floors down.
Click to expand...

How would you know this ?
 
Pardalis said:
Oh, I think I'm getting the gist of it with you, professor.
Click to expand...

My evidence disqualifies me, I'm of the lowly "truth" crowd and use facts with reason.

Oh, worst of all I do it because it will protect life, our rights, our freedoms, our liberty and pursuit of happiness.

Do you know the GREATER meaning of free speech quack?
 
Christophera said:
My evidence disqualifies me, I'm of the lowly "truth" crowd and use facts with reason.

Oh, worst of all I do it because it will protect life, our rights, our freedoms, our liberty and pursuit of happiness.
Click to expand...

Amen

Do you know the GREATER meaning of free speech quack?
Click to expand...

uh... anybody can say what ever they want about anything, regardless of how stupid it is?
 
Christophera said:
My evidence disqualifies me, I'm of the lowly "truth" crowd and use facts with reason.

Oh, worst of all I do it because it will protect life, our rights, our freedoms, our liberty and pursuit of happiness.

Do you know the GREATER meaning of free speech quack?
Click to expand...

HOW DARE YOU. You come here, with your crap, your logical fallacies, your close-mindedness, and dare talk down to people who don't share your demented view?

Edited by tim: 
Wow. Whilst I admire erudition generally, I think you may be a little over the top here. Let's just leave it at the above comment, shall we?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Belz... said:
So... you mean that the core isn't really a core... because it WOULD HAVE BEEN GONE AT THAT POINT ?



How would you know this ?
Click to expand...

Check the delays and paths section of my page,

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1232703

i understand delay systems for demolition and how to control the descent of a structure, generally. Using videos, still and eyewitness testimony from firefighters and others I am able to fit the WTC event together with great consistency.

Here is an email I received from a demo contractor of 30 years experience.


Subject:*
deception achieved
Date:*
Wed, 24 May 2006 22:43:27 -0700

Awesome work, very well presented with great links. I am a demolition contractor for 30 years and it all fits and always believed this was the case.Now there needs to be the rest of the story.

An eyewitness describes explosions in the basement.

PHILLIP MORELLI
http://www.gallerize.com/153 WINDY TOWERS OF 9-11 Four-Dateien/image001.jpg

Construction worker in the WTC Phillip Morelli (37 years old on 9-11-1) describes being thrown to the ground by two explosions while in the fourth subbasement of the North Tower.* The first, which threw him to the ground and seemed to coincide with the plane crash, was followed by a larger blast that again threw him to the ground and this time blew out walls.* He then made his way to the South Tower and was in the subbasement there when the second plane hit, again associated with a powerful underground blast.* This is one of a series of* interviews with WTC survivors done by NY1 News:** ny1.com/pages/RRR/911special_survivors.html
(source
 
Last edited:
kevin said:
first, that is a generic definition. second, it also says the outer perimeter is aluminum. WTC was steel. third, it's a completely generic scan hosted on your own site, the only proof that it comes from the oxford encyclopedia of technology and innovation is your own claim. You didn't even bother to scan the copyright page (assuming you scanned it, which I rather doubt.)
Click to expand...

The WTC towers had a aluminum facia over the steel perimeter box columns.

I did not scan that. seatnineb from democraticunderground did. He found it in the UK. I know the towers core was concrete, why should I doubt it or be reluctant to use even though it is not the best documention?

I have plenty of other evidence to show that steel core columns did not exist and some of it show the core or parts of it. There is theconcrete shear wall Or the Top of WTC 2 core falls onto WTC 3. Of course if you do not know steel and concrete construction this information may not be of much use to you. Perhasp you could gain an education or consult with a contractor/engineer generally about the appearance of steel and concrete during collapse and other conditions.
 
Christophera said:
...Perhasp you could gain an education or consult with a contractor/engineer generally about the appearance of steel and concrete during collapse and other conditions.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should stop talking out of your ass like some smacktard that has spent too many hours watching the X-files.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom