• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
How about 25 stories? Look at the angle the photo is taken from, Christophera. Are you telling me those are HALLWAYS? Please provide a schematic diagram of hallways that go inthe indicated directions.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehost/87904496d59e43d90.jpg[/qimg]​

ETA; Christophera, I really recommend you get the video "New York." Remember that these are video images, and the moving helicopter shows the light between the columns from many angles.

We see through the hallways of the concrete core just fine.
 
Workers saw it, we just cannot find the ones that are alive still that saw it

So do you have a quote from a worker who saw the core, but he is dead now? Who is this worker? Just how many workers do you think are still alive after only 35 years? You can't find a single worker who remembers the HUGE undertaking that pouring a concrete core would entail?

How many of them would have to say they saw NO concrete core for you to start questioning your theory?

Indeed, what would it take for you to be convinced there was no concrete core?
 
We see through the hallways of the concrete core just fine.
Please provide a schematic that shows hallways going at these angles, Christophera, or admit that you're wrong about the core.

Please try to be a man and not a little child.

I await your diagram.

ETA: Christophera, I really recommend you get the video "New York." Remember that I've been posting screen grabs from MOVING images, and the moving helicopter shows the light between the columns from many angles, and shows the steel columns at various stages of construction. Sorry, there is no concrete core.
 
Last edited:
Please provide a schematic that shows hallways going at these angles, Christophera, or admit that you're wrong about the core.

Please try to be a man and not a little child.

I await your diagram.

ETA: Christophera, I really recommend you get the video "New York." Remember that I've been posting screen grabs from MOVING images, and the moving helicopter shows the light between the columns from many angles, and shows the steel columns at various stages of construction. Sorry, there is no concrete core.

Look, I've posted links to many images that SHOULD show at leat ONE of the 47, 1300 foot steel columns that you and FEMA claim existed, AND no steel columns are seen. Sorry, you've got the diagram of WTC 1 core and that is all I'm putting out.

i suggest you put out a littel effort instead of misinformation. Constrcut a small site that compiles all the images of the stee lcore columns you and FEMA claim existed.
 
Last edited:
Whatsamatta" can't recognize light passing through hallways?

More importantly, where are the steel core columns in this image of the concrete shear wall?

Christophera, please stop this charade. You can't provide a diagram that would explain "hallways" running at crazy angles through the cores. If you tried, I'd just post more screen grabs from different angles that show how ridiculous your idea is.

Why not just do as I ask and watch the Ric Burns documentary? What are you afraid of?
 
Do you know what argumentum ad nauseum means, Christophera? It's the logical fallacy that arguing the same point over and over makes you right. It doesn't. Evidence does. You don't have any. We do. This is the "concrete core" that Christophera goes on about ad nauseum.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehost/87904496d16e39a49.jpg[/qimg]​

Oh, that's just Christophera being Christophera. He's under the delusion that good, serious debate consists of insulting people and repeating the same meaningless drivel over and over until the other person realizes they're talking to a mindless idiot and gives up. It's like two toddlers on a playground going "UH-UH! UH-UH!" at each other for an hour. I'm guessing Christophera doesn't really have a whole lot of real experience interacting with adults face-to-face, so he's formed his ideas via Internet chat rooms like the LC forum. And someone once told him that the concrete core thing is significant, so he's latched onto it and simply can't let go because, let's face it, he really doesn't have much else going on anyway. It's annoying as hell of course, but ulimately it's more pitiable than anything else.
 
Look, I've posted links to many images that SHOULD show at leat ONE of the 47, 1300 foot steel columns that you and FEMA claim existed, AND no steel columns are seen.
You have posted the same few images over and over again and assign your own nomenclature to what you think you see.

Your supposed concrete shear wall is a section of the outer tube, the perimeter of the tower. If it's a concrete shear wall, then where are the "interior box columns that you claim should be surrounding it?

btw, you still haven't responded as to how the box column in the photo you provided was so perfectly cut by demo charges without any sort of deformation. Care to expound on that?
 
Read my page,

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

It will save lots of space.

While I would enjoy saving said space, my workplace will not allow me to view said page. Would you please make an exception and explain:

How did the rest of the building collapse if the core was still standing? Why wasn't there a huge explosion when the C4 in the standing core detonated? Also, if thermite explosives had been detonated in the basement, what was the core standing on?


True enough. However, the structural value of a steel column is gone quickly.

True as well, however even this is not an immediate reaction.


Again, I don't have access, would you mind please?

Mr. Kark,

There are no images of the steel core columns because they did not exist. What is being posted are misrepresentations. If the steel core columns existed they would be seen HER. Instead what is seen is the spire, formed by an interio box column and an end view of the concrete core shear wall.

I suppose we must agree to disagree.
 
Really ?

How can the towers fall at free fall speeds if the debris falls faster ?

Geez, ......... I can hardly believe that this has been asked.

You have made an error, perhaps intentionally. This I consider to be a disinfo tactic it is so confusing.

The towers you refer to are not falling yet so the debris outruns them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom