SezMe
post-pre-born
LostAngeles hit it out of the park with her questions. So, psy kick, what say you?
To be fair, I think that there is enough ambiguity in the first statement so that it can be read as consistent with the more detailed account. Of course, the less detail the more impressive it seems.No, you said the first time around that you had told no one. You said nothing about any amount. Your statement implied that you had told no one that you had, "...asked for a certain amount of money..."
To be fair, I think that there is enough ambiguity in the first statement so that it can be read as consistent with the more detailed account. Of course, the less detail the more impressive it seems.
True. Especially when one considers that it was a round number. Praying for $187.16 to pay the long overdue electrical bill and getting it is a lot more impressive than thinking "If I can just get a hundred bucks, I can make it through the month" and getting that.It's not much of a coincidence that someone from a group of people that knew he needed help sent an amount of money that happened to match an amount he was thinking of... certainly not the powerful statement psy kick was hoping would convince us that prayer beats wishing in the results department.
Of course it doesn't add to the mounting evidence prayer is ineffectual. It doesn't add to the evidence of anything. A poorly designed study shows nothing. Nothing, as in no evidence.And yet...
The graph certainly shows an abrupt change in the trend of gasoline prices at that time.
I'm not saying that the two had anything to do with each other. I'm just saying that the evidence provided does not disprove the hypothesis that praying has no effect.
Who knows exactly what all those clergymen actually prayed for? Maybe a bunch of them prayed for "gas prices to stop rising" instead of for "gas prices to go down".
While I am a firm believer that prayer is ineffectual, this study does not add to the data supporting that belief.
evidence not evidentsIs’t that a woowoo tactic. If you can not attack the evidents, attack the person.
And if your going to correct my grammar, please show what you mean.
I learn from my mistakes.![]()
) I agree, which is why I am taking exception to Randi saying that this test "failed grandly".Of course it doesn't add to the mounting evidence prayer is ineffectual. It doesn't add to the evidence of anything. A poorly designed study shows nothing. Nothing, as in no evidence.
And yet...
The graph certainly shows an abrupt change in the trend of gasoline prices at that time.
I agree, which is why I am taking exception to Randi saying that this test "failed grandly".
It neither succeeded nor failed. It simply did nothing.
I wasn't trying to convince that. I believe I said something to the order of "sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Maybe just like chance."It's not much of a coincidence that someone from a group of people that knew he needed help sent an amount of money that happened to match an amount he was thinking of... certainly not the powerful statement psy kick was hoping would convince us that prayer beats wishing in the results department.
See?I know from personal experience, sometimes prayer is definitely answered. But sometimes it isn't. Its a bit capricious. So you can't count on it to happen (if one is christian). Sometimes He'll answer, sometimes, its a no.
See?
I might be a bit late with this, but I just wanted to point out that 'no' is an answer as well.Sometimes He'll answer, sometimes, its a no.
There are failures, and there are grand failures. Having nothing happen is not a grand failure; it is a simple failure. But even so (and please pardon the double negative), nothing didn't happen in this case.But .... if you invent a death ray and you aim it at something and pull the trigger and nothing happens, isn't that a grand failure? It doesn't have to blow up in your face to be considered so.