• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christophera said:
Really, you can consider that secret elements of government are going to chance that their construction project is to blame rather than some other likely perpetrator? Because ONLY optimaly placed and distributed explosives can do what happened. Consider the release of toxins. And the considerations for all that oil being available under the watchful eyes of only your military as we rush to get the villans, can you ignore that too?

We have been decieved for many, many decades. Some want to be decieved and can ignore our murdered brothers and sisters easily.
Click to expand...

What was wrong with the sniffer dogs that were active in the WTC a few weeks before the attacks? Did they all have colds? Could they not smell a building made of C4?
 
Katachresis said:
It's usually I before E, except after C, and then something about neighbors and weigh. Maybe you should start there.
Click to expand...
I... E... C... as in International Explosion Conspiracy? Spooky how all evidence points the same direction, isn't it?
 
Christophera,

What prompted you to these mind-numbingly stupid and paranoid conclusions?

Was it your father's 38 years of "harmful hypnotic telepathy"? Was the "use of his eyes to perform hypnotic deepening techniques" by "blinking intensely" and by making "circular motions with his head accompanying the use of his eyes" that led you to this bizarre state?

You want us to produce evidence? The same amount of evidence that the California Superior Court found you provided in your suit? The one where they said "PLAINTIFF HAD NO RELEVANT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS CLAIM" except for "spectral" evidence? Or evidence that "plaintiff intends to introduce that has not been deemed relevant in any American court since the Salem witch trials according to the plaintiff's own legal research."

Or when Bonnie Baker of the Santa Barbara District Attorney's office said "This is the first time in the history of this office that an insanity defense was offered in a child support matter"? Or her sworn asserton that "if defendent actually believes what he says in his declaration, it would be a matter of public interest and safety to keep him off the highway altogether"?

Or was it the shock that so many of your custody documents were filed exactly one year before, on September 11, 2000?

Perhaps you need some of your own hypnosis and nitrous oxide to cure your condition.

Your written record of attempts to get the court, mental health services, and social services to buy into your lame conspiracy theories is a perfect companion to the drivel you shovel here.

I hope that Wade doesn't turn out to inherit your illness and delusions.

Seek help from a professional.

- Timothy
 
Shrinker said:
What was wrong with the sniffer dogs that were active in the WTC a few weeks before the attacks? Did they all have colds? Could they not smell a building made of C4?
Click to expand...

It was only 3 days before 9-11 that WTC 2 was powered down on the upper 48 floors for 38 hours for a cable upgrade.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html#anchor1212053

The building wasn't made of C4. The steel rebar inside the concrete was coated with a small, engineered amount of C4. Parafin plugs were cast on the inside of the core to fill inspection ports on the rebar. the presence of the ports were in the documentary I saw in 1990.

Recall that after the lease of the WTC there were major complaints from people trying to get to lower floors because they had to go up, change elevators and come down to get around the elevator work. The core was very thick at the base and getting detonators to the rebar would be a big job, but the holes made to get to the bar could be refilled with parafin.
 
Originally Posted by Katachresis :
Again...

A rather more difficult question:


From whom will you accept any evidence. Please tell us.
__________________
 
Timothy said:
Christophera,

What prompted you to these mind-numbingly stupid and paranoid conclusions?

Was it your father's 38 years of "harmful hypnotic telepathy"? Was the "use of his eyes to perform hypnotic deepening techniques" by "blinking intensely" and by making "circular motions with his head accompanying the use of his eyes" that led you to this bizarre state?

You want us to produce evidence? The same amount of evidence that the California Superior Court found you provided in your suit? The one where they said "PLAINTIFF HAD NO RELEVANT EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS CLAIM" except for "spectral" evidence? Or evidence that "plaintiff intends to introduce that has not been deemed relevant in any American court since the Salem witch trials according to the plaintiff's own legal research."

Or when Bonnie Baker of the Santa Barbara District Attorney's office said "This is the first time in the history of this office that an insanity defense was offered in a child support matter"? Or her sworn asserton that "if defendent actually believes what he says in his declaration, it would be a matter of public interest and safety to keep him off the highway altogether"?

Or was it the shock that so many of your custody documents were filed exactly one year before, on September 11, 2000?

Perhaps you need some of your own hypnosis and nitrous oxide to cure your condition.

Your written record of attempts to get the court, mental health services, and social services to buy into your lame conspiracy theories is a perfect companion to the drivel you shovel here.

I hope that Wade doesn't turn out to inherit your illness and delusions.

Seek help from a professional.

- Timothy
Click to expand...

Very good Tim,

you are actually studying some of what is happening. It is true, we do not know everything about the human mind (not as much as we used to) But all of that is off topic.

And remember, when you attack me, rather than my evidence and the scenario of the WTC based upon the evidence, you show how weak your argument is.
 
Last edited:
Anyone got a good recipe for shepherds pie?

I was thinking of making that tomorrow, and my usual recipe is so plain.
 
Christophera said:
We have been decieved for many, many decades. Some want to be decieved and can ignore our murdered brothers and sisters easily.
Click to expand...
I implore you to personally devote whatever remaining decades or years you have left to live on this topic. Do it. Don't hold back in the slightest.

"Back, and to the left."
 
Christophera said:
Really, you can consider that secret elements of government are going to chance that their construction project is to blame rather than some other likely perpetrator? Because ONLY optimaly placed and distributed explosives can do what happened. Consider the release of toxins. And the considerations for all that oil being available under the watchful eyes of only your military as we rush to get the villans, can you ignore that too?

We have been decieved for many, many decades. Some want to be decieved and can ignore our murdered brothers and sisters easily.
Click to expand...
Yeah...I'm not following your logic there. Anyone care to help me out? Is it just me?
 
Christophera, you have it backwards. YOU have made extraordinary claims. YOU must supply the argument, the evidence, the proof. Not anyone else. You. Please try to remember how this works or I'll have to demand you explain that miniature orange hippopotamus you keep hidden behind your left ear.
 
Christophera said:
Very good Tim,

you are actually studying some of what is happening. It is true, we do not know everything about the human mind (not as much as we used to) But all of that is off topic.
Click to expand...

It's Timothy, not Tim. Tim is a different user, and a moderator here.

I have no argument. From the beginning I have only wanted one thing. For you to answer one question about your original post. You evade and evade and evade. I make no claim. I ask you for a simple answer. And you evade and evade.

It's not off topic. It shows your documented record as a delusional paranoid loony.

Christophera said:
And remember, when you attack me, rather than my evidence and the scenario of the WTC based upon the evidence, you show how weak your argument is.
Click to expand...

Hypocrite! As I recall, you accused me of supporting murderers.

Christophera said:
Timmy wants the impossible because all that is available is that the towers NIST says existed cannot be evidenced with raw information.

By doing so he supports the lies that the real murderers hide behind.
Click to expand...

P.S. If you're going to be so paranoid, you really should keep your name, address, telephone number, driver's license number, and family members' name a little more secure.
 
I have never ignored anyone, probably never will.

And I'll keep the subsciption to this thread, and delete them all.

This thread is like a brush fire, and will burn itself out in a short while.

Sadly, others will replace it, and I quess it's our job to man the watch tower, volunteer to give out time and resources, and be ever vigilant to protect the facts, to use our skills to end the flames of ignorance.

I just hate getting my hands dirty doing it.
 
Christophera said:
Wow,
You got it figured out, the core issue. Right on! Reminds me of one of my favorite thread titles "Why is it so important there is NOT a concrete core".

If you take the "q" in the tag out upon quoting, the image will post.
Click to expand...



....because, if that's the case, the Fema image and yours are NOT incompatable. they're both simplified in different ways, but they both show the hallway through the core. Look at the Layer labled "Floor Plan" on the Fema Shot. The corridor is there, through the Colums, the yellow path in the middle of them. You even have the same number of Colums along the edges of the core in both pictures, you just elected not to show the ones in the middle.

Someone with a better skill at image software can draw the lines to match up the colums in both pictures, but images are both showing the same thing...

Trifikas

ETA: I just realized I shouldn't say they're "Your" pictures, I don't know if you drew them or if they're from others. it's somewhat moot since they're still the pictures you're advancing as part of your argument.
 
Last edited:
Curnir said:
Anyone got a good recipe for shepherds pie?

I was thinking of making that tomorrow, and my usual recipe is so plain.
Click to expand...
I think the simplicity is the charm of a shepherd's pie.

That said, a local restaurant serves what it calls a "Santa Fe Shephard's (sic) Pie." Chile mac instead of the ground beef and jack cheese instead of parm. Maybe slice up a jalapeno or two?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom