• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry 1, but I'm busy teaching a zebra to speak french-canadian goose. I'll catch up when I can.
 
Last edited:
Sorry 1, but I'm busy teaching a zebra to speak french-canadian goose. I'll catch up when I can.
And playing not-so-dead, of course. Make sure the zebras know the word for "migration" and "lactose intolerance." It's very important.
 
And playing not-so-dead, of course. Make sure the zebras know the word for "migration" and "lactose intolerance." It's very important.
I took the liberty of making the kill phrase "Zero Point Energy." I've also nearly completed the Sockulator 3k. It quickly counts socks but slowly prints the results so that it still takes the same amount of time as hand counting.
 
I took the liberty of making the kill phrase "Zero Point Energy." I've also nearly completed the Sockulator 3k. It quickly counts socks but slowly prints the results so that it still takes the same amount of time as hand counting.
Excellent work. We will have to verify the results by hand counting, of course.
 
Make sure you know who you're responding to before you engage in childish name-calling. It just makes your feeble argument sound all the more 'tarded. And I live in Texas.

I believe he was talking to me, and refering to my earlier comments. I guess geggy can't read latin very well.;)
 
Are you really that stupid? (That is what we call a retorical question--we know you actually are)
See my post 2 up.
A controlled demolition is designed to perform as if the building had major structural damage.
It imitates the WTC collapse, not the other way around...

I'm really interested in hearing you explain why the falling of WTC7 doesn't look like a controlled demo.

Paneteris, you left out the standdown of NORAD and the wargame exercises that were performed on the morning of sept 11 in the list of facts. You need to think who benefitted the most from the sept 11 tragedy. The Bush administraion knew what was coming and saw the devastation as an opportunity to solidfy their power. They knew they could use it as a false reason for their criminal activities such as NSA spying without permission, which they've been doing long before sept 11. During the time of the attack, citizens were bolted down with fear and distress causing the frontal lobes of their brain to shut down which means they were not thinking clearly at all. The administration took full advantage to galvinize public support for the hunt of Osama in the middle east, meaning they used sept 11 as a justification to invade the middle east in order to maximize their profit and expand their military power. Also it's a matter of public record that Daddy Bush has financial ties to the bin Ladens that was established in the 70's. When Avery said 9/11 is the new JFK, he meant that 70 percent of the public were convinced that oswald didn't act alone and the warren commission was a whitewash. Unfortunately the reopening of a new investigation never happened. If you really care about your future and your children's future, you can take part of the peaceful movement and demand new invesitigation that could lead to the accountability of the bush administration and the meltdown of the white house.

Nearly 3 billion dollars have been spent on propaganda and PR campaign since the start of bush's presidency. It's no secret that the bush administration has gotten a stranglehold of the public media. The USA today article on Loose Change is just another fine example of smearing attacks on the movement and y'all fell for it.
 
I'm really interested in hearing you explain why the falling of WTC7 doesn't look like a controlled demo.
I'd be more interested to hear you explain why it does look like a controlled demo. You've already shown that you know very little about demolitions.
 
During the time of the attack, citizens were bolted down with fear and distress causing the frontal lobes of their brain to shut down which means they were not thinking clearly at all.

Now you lost me...

It's no secret that the bush administration has gotten a stranglehold of the public media. The USA today article on Loose Change is just another fine example of smearing attacks on the movement and y'all fell for it.

Can't you see this sounds a tiny little bit paranoid?
 
I'd be more interested to hear you explain why it does look like a controlled demo. You've already shown that you know very little about demolitions.

Sighs...

Under normal circumstances of a conteolled demolition, the bottom of the central cores of the building are blasted first (which explains the penthouse fell down before everything else fell), then the cores on both sides of the builidng are blasted. Why? So the two sides of the building can collapse toward and inward of the center of the building. Why? To prevent the risk of both sides of the building from falling outward that could create larger field of debris that would make clean up less convienance and more difficult for machines and trucks.
 
The USA today article on Loose Change is just another fine example of smearing attacks on the movement and y'all fell for it.
Geggy, haven't you understood yet that ranting without specifics doesn't cut it here? What, specifically, is untrue in the USA Today article?
 
Well pernteias, I'm 29 with a wife and a 2 year old daughter. I live in salem, massachusetts. What else ya want to know about me?

Now you lost me...

That's because your third eye has been spraypainted.

Can't you see this sounds a tiny little bit paranoid?[/QUOTE]

Umm....no.
 
Nearly 3 billion dollars have been spent on propaganda and PR campaign since the start of bush's presidency. It's no secret that the bush administration has gotten a stranglehold of the public media. The USA today article on Loose Change is just another fine example of smearing attacks on the movement and y'all fell for it.

The official theory is accepted by the public media from the whole world. Has the Bush administration a stranglehold of all of them?
 
Last edited:
Paneteris, you left out the standdown of NORAD and the wargame exercises that were performed on the morning of sept 11 in the list of facts.

Please provide evidence that NORAD "stood down" so that the attacks could occur. Evidence, gaggy, not conjecture and more mindless ranting.

I'm waiting. Whatcha got?

ETA: 29 and with a child? Terrifying.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom