• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump's Second Term

I take it you are joking?
Yeah, no sorry for the confusion. I would prefer networks not air it. I think it would cause more harm than good among people who are just apolitical and never cared before until they are more or less forced to watch it. Then they might get politically active.

The people who are pissed about it already have their minds made up. All I see is it attracting more election deniers than there were before.

Long story short I don't have a lot of faith in my fellow Americans to reason critically.
 
Last edited:
TINA SMITH: Researchers in MN recently made a breakthrough in childhood cancer in Black kids with a National Cancer Institute grant. But it seems to me that according to your proposed rule, this type of research wouldn't allowed because it's 'DEI.'

VOUGHT: We are against DEI policies. We have intended to rid of them whenever we possibly can ... the days of us funding CRT -- we're not doing that anymore

video in link
Didn't Voight understand the question?
 
Last edited:
Leavitt says everything Trump says tonight about the 2020 election "will be backed by facts and evidence that will be provided this evening"

video in link
Would it be too much to ask that he goes fully off into the deep end of conspiracy theories and insanity? MAGA won't care, but maybe, maybe enough people will finally see how unfit he is for office.

Yeah yeah I know, never going to happen.
 
Sure thing Bari Weiss, sure thing.

CBS News wants to take a “middle ground” approach on airing President Donald Trump’s national address Thursday night as network chiefs wrestle over whether to carry it live, according to a new report.

CNN Chief Media Analyst Brian Stelter gave his predictions on what TV networks will do when the cameras start rolling on Trump in the East Room of the White House at 9 p.m. ET.

The issue that networks are grappling with is whether they will be doing their viewers a disservice by airing a speech that could be filled with falsehoods about the 2020 election being stolen from Trump. The White House has been tight-lipped about what Trump will cover in his speech months away from the midterms, but the president did give a hint: “Free and fair elections.” Stelter said in his Reliable Sources newsletter Thursday that he has been told CBS may take a “middle-ground” approach by quickly editing clips of Trump’s address to air shortly after, rather than playing the whole speech live.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
The network’s controversial evening news host, Tony Dokoupil, would host a special report later in the 9 p.m. hour, fact-checking Trump’s claims.
Sure thing Bari Weiss, sure thing.
 
Well he gets so excited when he talks about it, I do wonder if he can refrain from going off script at all. If he starts improvising it could end up a way bigger trainwreck than you'd expect.
 
Leavitt says everything Trump says tonight about the 2020 election "will be backed by facts and evidence that will be provided this evening"

video in link
Honestly, I would find the statement that "The 2020 elections had serious problems and here's the evidence for what and why..." to be almost trivially easy to follow up in an honest, forthright, and voluminous manner. Republicans did a lot of deeply problematic crap as long-term groundwork for rigging elections in their favor in general beforehand and an extraordinary amount of deeply problematic crap directly involving that specific election.

Pretending that Trump even could stay on script to make a case of that nature in the first place in the imaginary circumstance that there was valid evidence for his oft repeated lies, though, is a deeply unreasonable pretense.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom